fbpx

Author Archives: Jonathan Valin

The 2023 AXPONA Show: Jonathan Valin on Speakers $30k and Up

Judging by the variety of shows and attendees, I’d name AXPONA 2023 a roaring success—not fairly Munich High End stage, particularly in the way in which of recent product introductions, however approaching it. Almost everybody within the trade was there, together with a bunch of parents (e.g., Cyrill Hammer of Soulution, Gabi Rijnveld of Crystal Cable, Jack Miura of Air Tight, Franc Kuzma of Kuzma Ltd., Roland Gauder of Gauder Akustik, et al.) who don’t usually come to regional U.S. exhibits. But AXPONA has grown past a regional present. It is now the closest factor we’ve got to a CES-level high-end-audio occasion.

Happily, the sound at this 12 months’s AXPONA was, for probably the most half, additionally a hit. Of course, the Schaumburg Renaissance’s small resort rooms and huge convention-center halls had their peculiarities, however at the least the colorations had been constant. Many audio system (not all, by any means) struggled a bit within the higher midrange and the low finish. Very few screamed or boomed at you, as nearly every little thing does in these terrible glass-walled cubicles at Munich’s MOC, however within the Renaissance resort rooms there was a slight tendency to room-induced brightness and lumpy midbass. The enormous conference halls had their very own set of sonic points, chief amongst which was the difficulty many audio system (even many massive audio system) had merely filling these cavernous areas with sound. Without a lot if any room help, the displays might have a tendency towards the anechoic, which is to say that pure tonal heat was generally (not at all times) diminished.

Nonetheless, as I stated, this was largely a good-sounding—in some circumstances, a really good-sounding—present. It was additionally, as I’ve famous, a big present. Which implies that, despite my finest efforts, I undoubtedly missed a number of the demos on the Renaissance’s 11 flooring of resort rooms and conference halls. I in all probability bought pricing and nomenclature mistaken in a couple of circumstances, too. My apologies prematurely to these of us I missed and to these whose names, particulars, and/or value tags I screwed up. (You attempt taking intensive notes on a tiny iPhone keyboard and see how effectively you do.) As I’ve written many instances previously, I’m only one man with a briefcase stuffed with blues, jazz, and classical LPs. So, present some sympathy (as Mick as soon as stated a couple of very totally different character).

Gauder Acoustic Reference 200

I’m going to arrange this report by flooring, beginning on the prime (16), the place Dr. Roland Gauder of Gauder Akustik launched his four-driver, three-way, $149k DARC 200, pushed by an entire suite of Soulution Series 7 electronics and sourced by a Soulution 760 DAC (certainly one of my references) and an unique Yukiseimitsu Audio AP-01 turntable. As it turned out, this room was a pleasant shock, because the DARC 200s weren’t geared up with Accuton ceramic woofers, as has been the case with the Gauder audio system I’ve heard previously, however with aluminum-sandwich ones (the midrange, I imagine, stays ceramic and the tweeter diamond). The attribute ribs of the good-looking chassis have additionally been modified to stable aluminum, with intermediate dampers between every rib. The sonic results of these modifications to drivers and enclosures couldn’t have been extra constructive. Gauders have by no means lacked for element, however in tone coloration they’ve tended towards the lean, cool, antiseptic facet. Not the DARCs! The sound was extraordinarily wealthy, clean, darkish, beautiful, and listenable. And tremendously dynamic. It was only a matter of luck, however this very first room turned out to be a possible candidate for Best of Show.

Franco Serblin Ktema

Next door, AXISS Audio (now beneath Cliff Duffey’s in a position administration) was displaying the five-driver, four-way, $40k Franco Serblin Ktêma floorstander, pushed and sourced by Air Tight fantastic electronics. Brighter, extra current, and extra instant than the Gauder within the midrange and treble, the Ktêma was nonetheless wealthy and full in coloration with distinctive replica of standup bass. My notes learn: “Very rattling good, once more!”

Vivid Giya G2

I subsequent visited GTT Audio’s room, the place Bill Parish was displaying the five-driver, four-way, $68k Vivid Audio Giya G2 Series 2s. I’ve heard and preferred numerous iterations of this uniquely formed (to my eye, attractively so) loudspeaker a number of instances, right here and overseas, so I used to be anticipating good issues. What I bought was a mite disappointing. Driven by Audionet electronics and cabled by Kubala-Sosna, the Giya was a bit brighter, thinner, and extra aggressive than the Gauder or the Serblin within the mids and the treble and likewise much less well-defined within the bass (although the audio system had phenomenal influence on “The Great Gate of Kiev”). These room-induced points made the presentation good however not Best of Show-worthy.

Von Schweikert Ultra 7

Next up had been the multi-driver, five-way, $180k Von Schweikert Ultra 7s, powered by WestminsterLab electronics, sourced by a Lampizator DAC and Aurender server, and cabled by Masterbuilt. Although I haven’t at all times cottoned to the Von Ses’ sound within the enormous ballrooms the place they’re normally proven, this time round, in a small room, I assumed they had been very good. Lovely, full of life (only a contact shiny and aggressive on guitars), and well-balanced, they excelled on Dire Straits and different music.

Borresen Silver Supreme

Børresen Acoustics was displaying its $61k (sure, you learn that proper), stand-mounted 01 Silver Supreme two-way, pushed (in fact) by Aavik electronics and cabled with Ansuz wire. I’ve been a fan of Michael Børresen’s ribbon/cone two-ways since his Raidho days, so I used to be very a lot wanting ahead to listening to his new two-way references with elaborate cryo therapies and inductance-reducing solid-silver pole rings. Alas, the room didn’t serve the 01 in addition to it may need. Oh, the sound was loads good (Michael’s two-ways are at all times particular), however the nearly full absence of low bass and a little bit of graininess and brightness in mids and treble made the presentation much less excellent than it ought to’ve been for 61g’s.

Bayz

The $160k, two-way Bayz Audio Counterpoint 2.0 omni with carbon-fiber chassis was being pushed by VAC electronics. Though oddly discontinuous within the bass and a little bit shiny on woodwinds, it was, nonetheless, quick and open in all places else, with excellent depth and free-floating photographs. An fascinating loudspeaker.

Goebel Divin Noblesse

We now transfer to the 15th flooring, the place the large, five-driver, $250k Göbel Divin Noblesse was being pushed by 4 ARC amps, sourced by Wadax, and cabled by Göbel. A bit shiny on top-octave piano, it was very full within the midband octaves, very current and ahead on brass and winds, glorious on male voice, and a little bit laidback on drums and double bass. (I assumed it might have used subs.) Good however a mite condensed and aggressive on this smaller area, the Goebel was nice to take heed to however not a Best of Show contender.

MBL 101 MkII

We come now to certainly one of my favourite loudspeakers, the four-driver, four-way, $91,000 MBL 101E MkII omni, pushed and sourced (as traditional) by MBL’s personal excellent electronics. A number of points in the past, certainly one of my colleagues remarked that (till the present he was then reporting on) he’d by no means heard the MBLs sound good. Well, all I can say is perhaps he ought to seek the advice of an audiologist. This is and has at all times been an ideal loudspeaker. Grainless and pure with surprisingly good bass extension in a smaller room and easily exceptional spaciousness, it sounded very good on “People Get Ready” and different soul, rock, and jazz cuts. Yeah, it was a bit darkish in coloration on this area and a tiny bit shiny within the treble, but it surely was additionally exceedingly beautiful and lifelike. It was the primary speaker I discovered myself tapping my foot to, which says one thing excellent about its PRAT. Another Best of Show contender.

Grimm

Next up was the powered (by built-in Class D amps), DSP’d, $40k Grimm Audio LS1 two-way with subwoofer. Like nearly every little thing at this present, the Grimm was a little bit shiny within the higher mids. That apart, it was fairly good sounding, with a really good mix with its subwoofer. The soundstage on a Melody Gardot minimize was huge, and the timbre and focus of her voice had been fairly lifelike. While I wouldn’t name the LS1 a Best of Show, it got here shut, which is a primary in my expertise for a powered, DSP’d speaker.

Magico S3

Another outdated favourite of mine, Magico, confirmed its new, three-way, $45k S3 floorstander, pushed by Convergent Audio Technology electronics, sourced by Wadax and an Antipodes Audio streamer, and cabled by Stealth and Veda. Put merely, the S3 was a knockout. It had extraordinarily deep-reaching bass (measurably flat all the way down to 20Hz), which was a shock in these small rooms from 9″ drivers, wealthy tonality prime to backside, very stable imaging, and distinctive element. (It was simply fantastic on male vocals from the Blind Boys of Alabama.) While it didn’t picture outdoors its (aluminum) packing containers and was restricted in depth, it was nonetheless a surefire BOS contender—and one other triumph for Alon and Yair.

Rockport

On to the 14th flooring, the place one other outdated favourite, Rockport, was displaying its $37k Atria II, pushed by Vinnie Rossi electronics and sourced by MSB (one other of my references). This was a really candy, neutral-sounding transducer—neither overly darkish within the bass and midrange nor megaphonic within the higher mids. Because of its refreshing transparency and freedom from coloration, it was instantly one other of my Best of Show candidates.

We’ll skip the 13th flooring (Marriott did) and transfer on to the 12th, the place I got here throughout a French planar speaker, the $50k Dyptique Refrence, pushed by Audia Flight electronics and sourced by a Michell turntable (with DS Audio cartridge). Nowadays, coming throughout a brand new planar loudspeaker at a commerce present is a rarity (though AXPONA boasted a number of such introductions, certainly one of which, as you will notice, was extraordinary). Though not BOS materials, the Dyptique was nonetheless particular—unusually impartial and sensible. Maybe just a bit skinny in coloration, it was, nonetheless, certainly one of a small handful of audio system vying for “Best Intro.”

Vandersteen

Once once more, an outdated favourite, Vandersteen, confirmed its five-driver, three-way $41.7k Kento Carbon floorstander, pushed by an ARC preamp and Vandersteen’s personal amps, and sourced by an ARC DAC 9. As traditional, the Kento made a wealthy beautiful sound. Despite being a little bit lumped up within the bass because of the room, it was nice on trumpet, sax, flute, and trombone.

Acora Quartz SRC-1

The two-driver, two-way, $35k Acora Acoustics SRC-1 in a quartz enclosure was pushed by ampsandsound and VAC electronics and sourced by an SW1X DAC and a TW Acustik turntable. Unfortunately, the SRC-1 was very shiny once I got here into the room; to make issues worse, the bass was additionally poorly managed. When I returned on Day Three, these issues had been toned down, although SRC-1 was nonetheless a little bit shiny and spare and poorly outlined within the backside octaves. The speaker was additionally being performed too loud for such a tiny room.

Marten Mingus

The five-driver (a mixture of ceramic and aluminum cones), three-way $75k Marten Mingus Quintet 2 floorstander was being pushed by Jadis electronics. A bit “ceramic-sounding,” which is to say clear, quick, detailed, and lean, the Mingus had a constant sonic steadiness from prime to backside (no low-end darkness or lumpiness). Overall, it was on the dry facet.

We now transfer to Floor 7, as 8, 9, 10, and 11 had been reserved for visitors. the place the very first thing I got here throughout was the $75k Magico M2, pushed by Constellation electronics and sourced by Aurender. This is a speaker I’ve liked because it was launched, and AXPONA didn’t upset the applecart (to combine metaphors). While not as wealthy in coloration as the outstanding new S3, the M2 is extra delicate and detailed, although nowhere close to as deep-reaching. On Rhiannon Giddens’ “Do Right” and Leonard Cohen’s “Ain’t No Cure For Love,” it sounded extra like a ’stat than the S3 does. A borderline-BOS displaying.

TAD ME1

The two-way, three-driver (woofer and concentric mid/tweet) $33.5k TAD ME1 stand-mount was powered and sourced by TAD’s personal electronics and cabled by Wireworld. Though gentle within the decrease octaves, it was in any other case fairly interesting on a Stevie Ray Vaughan minimize.

The $49k Arion Audio Apollo 9 open-baffle line array with built-in sub was a bit one-noteish within the backside octaves however very open and wealthy in coloration on sax, guitar, and different devices. Lively, with good huge staging, its chief weak spot was the sub—not a lot the mix because the extension. Still, this was a pleasant sound.

Orchestralls

The undisputed winner of oddest loudspeaker at AXPONA was the $49k Orchestalls KMD 700R—a bizarre, multi-box, cone loudspeaker by which every of the packing containers is individually articulated by way of the arms of a big adjustable stand. The humorous half was that it truly sounded excellent—amazingly coherent contemplating the variety of cones and packing containers in play. Rich, expansive, and full vary with pretty flat and well-defined bass in a tiny room, it was excessive among the many most fascinating intros at this (or any) present.

Raidho

The five-driver, ribbon-tweetered, quasi-D’Appolito, $70k Raidho TD 3.2, pushed by Burmester electronics, sourced by a Vertere ’desk, and wired by RSX, was excellent on my Fabulous Basso D2D LP, completely very good on Li-Paz’s voice. It could not have been as full and wealthy on piano as the perfect methods, but it surely got here shut. A superior loudspeaker.

Stenheim Alumine 3 SE

The $43.2k Stenheim Alumine 3 SE, powered by Nagra electronics and sourced by Nagra digital and Baer analog confirmed fairly effectively on Leonard Cohen’s “Dance Me To the End Of Love.” Really fairly lovely sounding, the three SE could be very very similar to my reference Stenheim 5 SE, solely not as deep reaching. Even although the underside couple octaves weren’t being reproduced, there have been no different weaknesses I might detect and loads of strengths. Another close-to-Best-of-Show efficiency.

Clarisys Minuet with Constellation

We come now to probably the most pleasant shock of the present—one other full-range planar loudspeaker, this one from Switzerland and Vietnam (yup, it’s inbuilt Vietnam), the $36k Clarisys Minuet. This good-looking, extraordinarily sturdy, and seemingly well-made loudspeaker was being proven in two rooms, the primary the place it was pushed and sourced by Hegel electronics, the second (pictured right here) by Constellation electronics. Its efficiency in each rooms was merely very good—super-depth, super-separation, super-speed, and fairly deep, decently well-defined bass. Above all else, the Clarisys sounded extra like the actual factor within the midband than absolutely anything else at an excellent and aggressive present. Happily, the Minuet can be comparatively straightforward to drive (with a sensitivity of 88dB), in contrast to the Apogee ribbons of outdated, to which it bears a passing resemblance and will actually be partly modeled on. Obviously, the Clarisys is a Best of Show finalist.

Wilson Benesch Resolution 3 Zero

Wilson Benesch was displaying its multiway, biocomposite-enclosed, isobaric-woofered, $102k Resolution 3Zero floorstander. Like earlier WBs, the threeZero is impartial in an nearly colorless manner. This is nice for transparency and determination, not so sizzling for timbre. Fast, outlined, and a little bit antiseptic, it is extremely full vary, however convey your scarf and mittens as a result of it is usually very chilly.

My pal Jeff Catalano of High Water Sound provided up a $65k Cessaro Horn Acoustics Opus horn speaker with Opus subs, pushed by unique TWAcustik Raven electronics and sourced by TWAcustik’s attractive Raven LS-3 Copper turntable. This was a horn system that didn’t sound like horns—or, at the least, didn’t have their typical issues. Very a lot of a chunk, very full vary, and really wealthy and pure in timbre—with no cupped arms coloration—the Opuses made Ornette’s plastic sax, Don Cherry’s pocket trumpet, Ed Blackwell’s drumkit, and Charlie Haden’s bass sound “there.” It was additionally nice on Li-Paz’s basso and Rozsnyai’s live performance grand. This terrific horn system was additionally a BOS finalist.

Alta Audio was displaying its five-driver, quasi-D’Appolito $40k Titanium II Hestia floorstander, pushed by Infigo Audio Class A electronics. Neutral in timbre, the Hestia made for a pleasing pay attention.

Magico’s very good M2 made a second look in MSB’s room, the place it was being powered by MSB’s 500 Series amplifiers and sourced by MSB digital (together with its fantastic new Digital Director controller). As within the Constellation room, the M2s confirmed extraordinarily effectively, sounding unusually liquid, nearly light, and three-dimensional with MSB electronics.

Tidal confirmed its $75k Contriva G2—a four-driver, three-and-a-halfway floorstander with black ceramic mid and bass drivers, a diamond tweeter, and Tidal’s Tiradur enclosure. Driven and sourced by Tidal’s personal electronics and wired with Signal Project cables, it made a superb displaying on Rhiannon Giddens’ “Do Right,” reproducing her voice with appreciable delicacy and wonderful timbre. Though a little bit skinny within the bass, it managed to do effectively by Low Cut Connie, too.

Borresen M3

Børresen Acoustics additionally confirmed its five-driver, two-and-a-halfway, ribbon/cone, $94k 03 floorstander, pushed by Aavik’s new 880 Class A pre and energy amp. I didn’t know the Scandinavian music that was being performed, however the timbre was darkish and delightful with breathy texture, stable imaging, and delicate decay. Bass went very deep with very good assault and maintain—displaying a lot better linearity and management than previous Raidhos and Børresens. Indeed, this was the very best bass I’ve heard from certainly one of Michael’s massive audio system. That and the attractive naturalness of the mids and treble made the 03 a Best of Show contender.

We come now—and ultimately—to the first-floor rooms, a lot of which had been fairly massive.

Estelon Extreme II

First up was Estelon’s attractive, five-driver, $259k Extreme Mk II, with height-adjustabile higher module and a brand new tweeter that may be repositioned electronically for finest section response. Driven and sourced by Vitus electronics and wired with Crystal Cable Da Vinci, the Extreme was seated in an enormous room that didn’t enable it to indicate its finest. Despite a little bit ceramic leanness on voices (like Diana Krall’s), it nonetheless had sufficient physique to make performers nearly seen and was a paragon of openness, with an outstanding disappearing act.

Estelon XB

Estelon was additionally displaying its fantastic $58k XB Diamond Mk II three-way, powered and sourced by Soulution Series 5 electronics with wiring and room/tools therapies by Synergistic Research. With dense, attractive tone coloration and fabulous dynamics, this was a Best of Show contender from the primary minimize I listened to. It’s a pity that its huge brother didn’t get the room (and Ted Denny’s room/tools therapies) that the XB loved.

Stenheim Reference 2

As has usually been the case at exhibits previous, the large, five-driver, three-way, D’Appolito configured, $155k Stenheim Reference Ultime 2, pushed by 4 VTL amps and preamp and cabled by Nordost, was a narrative of two days. On Day One, when it hadn’t but settled in, it was good however not nice on Ornette’s This Is Our Music and Li-Paz’s Fabulous Basso LPs. On the third day, it was a real contender—merely marvelous on Rhiannon Giddens, Sinematic, Doug MacLeod, Hans Theessink, et al. Imaging was very good, tone coloration was wealthy and lifelike, bass was sensational, and the system was audibly clear to miking and engineering. All in all, it was like a jumbo Alumine 5 SE—and, in fact, a Best of Show contender.

Acora VRC-1

The $220k, granite-bodied, multi-driver Acora Acoustics VRC-1 was one other two-day affair. Driven by VAC electronics, the speaker was a mite sedate on Day One on the crisply plucked guitars of Saturday Night in San Francisco. The VRC-1 additionally had restricted soundstage depth, although stage width was glorious. My Fabulous Basso LP was fairly good, although Li-Paz sounded a bit extra like a baritone than a basso, and the bass of Rozsnyai’s piano sounded lumped up. On Day Three, after the audio system had settled in (which should’ve examined the Renaissance Schaumburg’s flooring) and the prime listening seat had been moved a lot nearer to the Acoras, the sound was improved in presence. Soundstage depth was nonetheless restricted, and there was nonetheless a little bit of a hump within the 50–80Hz vary. On the Li-Paz D2D LP, for instance, the piano was a little bit free on the underside and never as wealthy in midband harmonics because it may need been. However, Li-Paz sounded extra like a basso, and the general presentation was fairly lifelike.

Vimberg D

Wynn Audio was displaying the $70k Vimberg Tonda D three-way floorstanders, pushed by Karan electronics, sourced by a Kalista CD participant/DAC, and wired with Crystal’s Da Vinci cable. Though a little bit digital sounding general, the Vimberg was additionally extraordinarily clear and impartial, making for a pleasing, if barely analytic pay attention.

Dynaudio Confidence 50

The five-driver, D’Appolito-configured, $33.5k Dynaudio Confidence 50 floorstander, pushed by Octave monoblocks and sourced by a Sim Audio 780D DAC, was surprisingly candy, delicate, and pure in timbre on digital. Among the very best inexpensive cone loudspeakers in my bailiwick, the Confidence 50 was terribly pure on voice. Very near a BOS finalist.

Scaena 12

Finally, the multi-driver, line-array, $106k Scaena 12s with 4 dipole woofers per facet sounded only a bit dated. The woofers didn’t go very deep (e.g., on the bass and synth of The Black Keys “Shine A Light” from Let’s Rock); nor did they mix seamlessly, barely fudging the mids, decreasing transparency, and darkening tone coloration.

 

JV’s Best of Show

A tie! Though totally different in sound and expertise, the Clarisys Minuet planar, the MBL 101E MkII omnis, the Magico S3 dynamics, and the Rockport Atria II dynamics all managed the trick of constructing musicians nearly seen—and making music of all kinds a sonic delight. (Note that the Stenheim Reference Ultime 2, the Borresen Acoustics 03, and the Gauder Acoustic DARC 200 had been shut runners-up.)

 

JV’s Best Introduction

Magico S3.

The publish The 2023 AXPONA Show: Jonathan Valin on Speakers $30k and Up appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

The 2023 AXPONA Show: Jonathan Valin on Speakers $30k and Up

Judging by the variety of shows and attendees, I’d name AXPONA 2023 a roaring success—not fairly Munich High End stage, particularly in the way in which of latest product introductions, however approaching it. Almost everybody within the trade was there, together with a bunch of parents (e.g., Cyrill Hammer of Soulution, Gabi Rijnveld of Crystal Cable, Jack Miura of Air Tight, Franc Kuzma of Kuzma Ltd., Roland Gauder of Gauder Akustik, et al.) who don’t usually come to regional U.S. exhibits. But AXPONA has grown past a regional present. It is now the closest factor we’ve to a CES-level high-end-audio occasion.

Happily, the sound at this yr’s AXPONA was, for essentially the most half, additionally a hit. Of course, the Schaumburg Renaissance’s small resort rooms and enormous convention-center halls had their peculiarities, however not less than the colorations have been constant. Many audio system (not all, by any means) struggled a bit within the higher midrange and the low finish. Very few screamed or boomed at you, as nearly all the things does in these terrible glass-walled cubicles at Munich’s MOC, however within the Renaissance resort rooms there was a slight tendency to room-induced brightness and lumpy midbass. The enormous conference halls had their very own set of sonic points, chief amongst which was the difficulty many audio system (even many giant audio system) had merely filling these cavernous areas with sound. Without a lot if any room assist, the displays may have a tendency towards the anechoic, which is to say that pure tonal heat was typically (not all the time) diminished.

Nonetheless, as I mentioned, this was principally a good-sounding—in some instances, a really good-sounding—present. It was additionally, as I’ve famous, a big present. Which signifies that, regardless of my greatest efforts, I undoubtedly missed among the demos on the Renaissance’s 11 flooring of resort rooms and conference halls. I in all probability acquired pricing and nomenclature improper in a number of instances, too. My apologies prematurely to these people I missed and to these whose names, particulars, and/or value tags I screwed up. (You attempt taking in depth notes on a tiny iPhone keyboard and see how effectively you do.) As I’ve written many instances previously, I’m only one man with a briefcase filled with blues, jazz, and classical LPs. So, present some sympathy (as Mick as soon as mentioned a few very totally different character).

Gauder Acoustic Reference 200

I’m going to prepare this report by flooring, beginning on the prime (16), the place Dr. Roland Gauder of Gauder Akustik launched his four-driver, three-way, $149k DARC 200, pushed by an entire suite of Soulution Series 7 electronics and sourced by a Soulution 760 DAC (one in every of my references) and an unique Yukiseimitsu Audio AP-01 turntable. As it turned out, this room was a pleasant shock, because the DARC 200s weren’t geared up with Accuton ceramic woofers, as has been the case with the Gauder audio system I’ve heard previously, however with aluminum-sandwich ones (the midrange, I consider, stays ceramic and the tweeter diamond). The attribute ribs of the good-looking chassis have additionally been modified to strong aluminum, with intermediate dampers between every rib. The sonic results of these modifications to drivers and enclosures couldn’t have been extra optimistic. Gauders have by no means lacked for element, however in tone shade they’ve tended towards the lean, cool, antiseptic facet. Not the DARCs! The sound was extraordinarily wealthy, easy, darkish, pretty, and listenable. And tremendously dynamic. It was only a matter of luck, however this very first room turned out to be a possible candidate for Best of Show.

Franco Serblin Ktema

Next door, AXISS Audio (now below Cliff Duffey’s ready administration) was displaying the five-driver, four-way, $40k Franco Serblin Ktêma floorstander, pushed and sourced by Air Tight fantastic electronics. Brighter, extra current, and extra speedy than the Gauder within the midrange and treble, the Ktêma was nonetheless wealthy and full in shade with distinctive copy of standup bass. My notes learn: “Very rattling good, once more!”

Vivid Giya G2

I subsequent visited GTT Audio’s room, the place Bill Parish was displaying the five-driver, four-way, $68k Vivid Audio Giya G2 Series 2s. I’ve heard and favored numerous iterations of this uniquely formed (to my eye, attractively so) loudspeaker a number of instances, right here and overseas, so I used to be anticipating good issues. What I acquired was a mite disappointing. Driven by Audionet electronics and cabled by Kubala-Sosna, the Giya was a bit brighter, thinner, and extra aggressive than the Gauder or the Serblin within the mids and the treble and in addition much less well-defined within the bass (although the audio system had phenomenal influence on “The Great Gate of Kiev”). These room-induced points made the presentation good however not Best of Show-worthy.

Von Schweikert Ultra 7

Next up have been the multi-driver, five-way, $180k Von Schweikert Ultra 7s, powered by WestminsterLab electronics, sourced by a Lampizator DAC and Aurender server, and cabled by Masterbuilt. Although I haven’t all the time cottoned to the Von Ses’ sound within the enormous ballrooms the place they’re normally proven, this time round, in a small room, I believed they have been very good. Lovely, energetic (only a contact vivid and aggressive on guitars), and well-balanced, they excelled on Dire Straits and different music.

Borresen Silver Supreme

Børresen Acoustics was displaying its $61k (sure, you learn that proper), stand-mounted 01 Silver Supreme two-way, pushed (in fact) by Aavik electronics and cabled with Ansuz wire. I’ve been a fan of Michael Børresen’s ribbon/cone two-ways since his Raidho days, so I used to be very a lot trying ahead to listening to his new two-way references with elaborate cryo remedies and inductance-reducing solid-silver pole rings. Alas, the room didn’t serve the 01 in addition to it might need. Oh, the sound was lots good (Michael’s two-ways are all the time particular), however the nearly full absence of low bass and a little bit of graininess and brightness in mids and treble made the presentation much less excellent than it ought to’ve been for 61g’s.

Bayz

The $60k, two-way Bayz Audio Courante 2.0 omni with carbon-fiber chassis was being pushed by VAC electronics. Though oddly discontinuous within the bass and a bit of vivid on woodwinds, it was, nonetheless, quick and open in every single place else, with superb depth and free-floating photos. An fascinating loudspeaker.

Goebel Divin Noblesse

We now transfer to the 15th flooring, the place the massive, five-driver, $250k Göbel Divin Noblesse was being pushed by 4 ARC amps, sourced by Wadax, and cabled by Göbel. A bit vivid on top-octave piano, it was very full within the midband octaves, very current and ahead on brass and winds, wonderful on male voice, and a bit of laidback on drums and double bass. (I believed it may have used subs.) Good however a mite condensed and aggressive on this smaller area, the Goebel was nice to take heed to however not a Best of Show contender.

MBL 101 MkII

We come now to one in every of my favourite loudspeakers, the four-driver, four-way, $91,000 MBL 101E MkII omni, pushed and sourced (as regular) by MBL’s personal excellent electronics. A number of points in the past, one in every of my colleagues remarked that (till the present he was then reporting on) he’d by no means heard the MBLs sound good. Well, all I can say is perhaps he ought to seek the advice of an audiologist. This is and has all the time been a terrific loudspeaker. Grainless and pure with surprisingly good bass extension in a smaller room and easily outstanding spaciousness, it sounded excellent on “People Get Ready” and different soul, rock, and jazz cuts. Yeah, it was a bit darkish in shade on this area and a tiny bit vivid within the treble, but it surely was additionally exceedingly pretty and lifelike. It was the primary speaker I discovered myself tapping my foot to, which says one thing superb about its PRAT. Another Best of Show contender.

Grimm

Next up was the powered (by built-in Class D amps), DSP’d, $40k Grimm Audio LS1 two-way with subwoofer. Like nearly all the things at this present, the Grimm was a bit of vivid within the higher mids. That apart, it was fairly good sounding, with a really good mix with its subwoofer. The soundstage on a Melody Gardot lower was monumental, and the timbre and focus of her voice have been fairly lifelike. While I wouldn’t name the LS1 a Best of Show, it got here shut, which is a primary in my expertise for a powered, DSP’d speaker.

Magico S3

Another previous favourite of mine, Magico, confirmed its new, three-way, $45k S3 floorstander, pushed by Convergent Audio Technology electronics, sourced by Wadax and an Antipodes Audio streamer, and cabled by Stealth and Veda. Put merely, the S3 was a knockout. It had extraordinarily deep-reaching bass (measurably flat right down to 20Hz), which was a shock in these small rooms from 9″ drivers, wealthy tonality prime to backside, very strong imaging, and distinctive element. (It was simply fantastic on male vocals from the Blind Boys of Alabama.) While it didn’t picture outdoors its (aluminum) containers and was restricted in depth, it was nonetheless a surefire BOS contender—and one other triumph for Alon and Yoav.

Rockport

On to the 14th flooring, the place one other previous favourite, Rockport, was displaying its $37k Atria II, pushed by Vinnie Rossi electronics and sourced by MSB (one other of my references). This was a really candy, neutral-sounding transducer—neither overly darkish within the bass and midrange nor megaphonic within the higher mids. Because of its refreshing transparency and freedom from coloration, it was instantly one other of my Best of Show candidates.

We’ll skip the 13th flooring (Marriott did) and transfer on to the 12th, the place I got here throughout a French planar speaker, the $50k Dyptique Refrence, pushed by Audia Flight electronics and sourced by a Michell turntable (with DS Audio cartridge). Nowadays, coming throughout a brand new planar loudspeaker at a commerce present is a rarity (though AXPONA boasted a number of such introductions, one in every of which, as you will notice, was extraordinary). Though not BOS materials, the Dyptique was nonetheless particular—unusually impartial and practical. Maybe just a bit skinny in shade, it was, nonetheless, one in every of a small handful of audio system vying for “Best Intro.”

Vandersteen

Once once more, an previous favourite, Vandersteen, confirmed its five-driver, three-way $41.7k Kento Carbon floorstander, pushed by an ARC preamp and Vandersteen’s personal amps, and sourced by an ARC DAC 9. As regular, the Kento made a wealthy pretty sound. Despite being a bit of lumped up within the bass as a result of room, it was nice on trumpet, sax, flute, and trombone.

Acora Quartz SRC-1

The two-driver, two-way, $35k Acora Acoustics SRC-1 in a quartz enclosure was pushed by ampsandsound and VAC electronics and sourced by an SW1X DAC and a TW Acustik turntable. Unfortunately, the SRC-1 was very vivid after I got here into the room; to make issues worse, the bass was additionally poorly managed. When I returned on Day Three, these issues have been toned down, although SRC-1 was nonetheless a bit of vivid and spare and poorly outlined within the backside octaves. The speaker was additionally being performed too loud for such a tiny room.

Marten Mingus

The five-driver (a mixture of ceramic and aluminum cones), three-way $75k Marten Mingus Quintet 2 floorstander was being pushed by Jadis electronics. A bit of “ceramic-sounding,” which is to say clear, quick, detailed, and lean, the Mingus had a constant sonic stability from prime to backside (no low-end darkness or lumpiness). Overall, it was on the dry facet.

We now transfer to Floor 7, as 8, 9, 10, and 11 have been reserved for friends. the place the very first thing I got here throughout was the $75k Magico M2, pushed by Constellation electronics and sourced by Aurender. This is a speaker I’ve cherished because it was launched, and AXPONA didn’t upset the applecart (to combine metaphors). While not as wealthy in shade as the outstanding new S3, the M2 is extra delicate and detailed, although nowhere close to as deep-reaching. On Rhiannon Giddens’ “Do Right” and Leonard Cohen’s “Ain’t No Cure For Love,” it sounded extra like a ’stat than the S3 does. A borderline-BOS displaying.

TAD ME1

The two-way, three-driver (woofer and concentric mid/tweet) $33.5k TAD ME1 stand-mount was powered and sourced by TAD’s personal electronics and cabled by Wireworld. Though gentle within the decrease octaves, it was in any other case fairly interesting on a Stevie Ray Vaughan lower.

The $49k Arion Audio Apollo 9 open-baffle line array with built-in sub was a bit one-noteish within the backside octaves however very open and wealthy in shade on sax, guitar, and different devices. Lively, with good broad staging, its chief weak spot was the sub—not a lot the mix because the extension. Still, this was a pleasant sound.

Orchestralls

The undisputed winner of oddest loudspeaker at AXPONA was the $49k Orchestalls KMD 700R—a bizarre, multi-box, cone loudspeaker by which every of the containers is individually articulated by way of the arms of a giant adjustable stand. The humorous half was that it really sounded superb—amazingly coherent contemplating the variety of cones and containers in play. Rich, expansive, and full vary with pretty flat and well-defined bass in a tiny room, it was excessive among the many most fascinating intros at this (or any) present.

Raidho

The five-driver, ribbon-tweetered, quasi-D’Appolito, $70k Raidho TD 3.2, pushed by Burmester electronics, sourced by a Vertere ’desk, and wired by RSX, was excellent on my Fabulous Basso D2D LP, completely excellent on Li-Paz’s voice. It might not have been as full and wealthy on piano as the perfect programs, but it surely got here shut. A superior loudspeaker.

Stenheim Alumine 3 SE

The $43.2k Stenheim Alumine 3 SE, powered by Nagra electronics and sourced by Nagra digital and Baer analog confirmed fairly effectively on Leonard Cohen’s “Dance Me To the End Of Love.” Really fairly lovely sounding, the three SE may be very very similar to my reference Stenheim 5 SE, solely not as deep reaching. Even although the underside couple octaves weren’t being reproduced, there have been no different weaknesses I may detect and loads of strengths. Another close-to-Best-of-Show efficiency.

Clarisys Minuet with Constellation

We come now to essentially the most pleasant shock of the present—one other full-range planar loudspeaker, this one from Switzerland and Vietnam (yup, it’s inbuilt Vietnam), the $36k Clarisys Minuet. This good-looking, extraordinarily sturdy, and seemingly well-made loudspeaker was being proven in two rooms, the primary the place it was pushed and sourced by Hegel electronics, the second (pictured right here) by Constellation electronics. Its efficiency in each rooms was merely excellent—super-depth, super-separation, super-speed, and fairly deep, decently well-defined bass. Above all else, the Clarisys sounded extra like the actual factor within the midband than absolutely anything else at an excellent and aggressive present. Happily, the Minuet can also be comparatively straightforward to drive (with a sensitivity of 88dB), not like the Apogee ribbons of previous, to which it bears a passing resemblance and will the truth is be partly modeled on. Obviously, the Clarisys is a Best of Show finalist.

Wilson Benesch Resolution 3 Zero

Wilson Benesch was displaying its multiway, biocomposite-enclosed, isobaric-woofered, $102k Resolution 3Zero floorstander. Like earlier WBs, the threeZero is impartial in an nearly colorless method. This is nice for transparency and backbone, not so sizzling for timbre. Fast, outlined, and a bit of antiseptic, it is extremely full vary, however deliver your scarf and mittens as a result of it is usually very chilly.

My pal Jeff Catalano of High Water Sound supplied up a $65k Cessaro Horn Acoustics Opus horn speaker with Opus subs, pushed by unique TWAcustik Raven electronics and sourced by TWAcustik’s beautiful Raven LS-3 Copper turntable. This was a horn system that didn’t sound like horns—or, not less than, didn’t have their typical issues. Very a lot of a bit, very full vary, and really wealthy and pure in timbre—with no cupped fingers coloration—the Opuses made Ornette’s plastic sax, Don Cherry’s pocket trumpet, Ed Blackwell’s drumkit, and Charlie Haden’s bass sound “there.” It was additionally nice on Li-Paz’s basso and Rozsnyai’s live performance grand. This terrific horn system was additionally a BOS finalist.

Alta Audio was displaying its five-driver, quasi-D’Appolito $40k Titanium II Hestia floorstander, pushed by Infigo Audio Class A electronics. Neutral in timbre, the Hestia made for a pleasing hear.

Magico’s excellent M2 made a second look in MSB’s room, the place it was being powered by MSB’s 500 Series amplifiers and sourced by MSB digital (together with its fantastic new Digital Director controller). As within the Constellation room, the M2s confirmed extraordinarily effectively, sounding unusually liquid, nearly light, and three-dimensional with MSB electronics.

Tidal confirmed its $75k Contriva G2—a four-driver, three-and-a-halfway floorstander with black ceramic mid and bass drivers, a diamond tweeter, and Tidal’s Tiradur enclosure. Driven and sourced by Tidal’s personal electronics and wired with Signal Project cables, it made a very good displaying on Rhiannon Giddens’ “Do Right,” reproducing her voice with appreciable delicacy and beautiful timbre. Though a bit of skinny within the bass, it managed to do effectively by Low Cut Connie, too.

Borresen M3

Børresen Acoustics additionally confirmed its five-driver, two-and-a-halfway, ribbon/cone, $94k 03 floorstander, pushed by Aavik’s new 880 Class A pre and energy amp. I didn’t know the Scandinavian music that was being performed, however the timbre was darkish and exquisite with breathy texture, strong imaging, and delicate decay. Bass went very deep with excellent assault and maintain—displaying significantly better linearity and management than previous Raidhos and Børresens. Indeed, this was one of the best bass I’ve heard from one in every of Michael’s giant audio system. That and the beautiful naturalness of the mids and treble made the 03 a Best of Show contender.

We come now—and ultimately—to the first-floor rooms, a lot of which have been fairly giant.

Estelon Extreme II

First up was Estelon’s beautiful, five-driver, $259k Extreme Mk II, with height-adjustabile higher module and a brand new tweeter that may be repositioned electronically for greatest section response. Driven and sourced by Vitus electronics and wired with Crystal Cable Da Vinci, the Extreme was seated in an enormous room that didn’t permit it to point out its greatest. Despite a bit of ceramic leanness on voices (like Diana Krall’s), it nonetheless had sufficient physique to make performers nearly seen and was a paragon of openness, with an excellent disappearing act.

Estelon XB

Estelon was additionally displaying its fantastic $58k XB Diamond Mk II three-way, powered and sourced by Soulution Series 5 electronics with wiring and room/tools remedies by Synergistic Research. With dense, beautiful tone shade and fabulous dynamics, this was a Best of Show contender from the primary lower I listened to. It’s a pity that its large brother didn’t get the room (and Ted Denny’s room/tools remedies) that the XB loved.

Stenheim Reference 2

As has usually been the case at exhibits previous, the massive, five-driver, three-way, D’Appolito configured, $155k Stenheim Reference Ultime 2, pushed by 4 VTL amps and preamp and cabled by Nordost, was a narrative of two days. On Day One, when it hadn’t but settled in, it was good however not nice on Ornette’s This Is Our Music and Li-Paz’s Fabulous Basso LPs. On the third day, it was a real contender—merely marvelous on Rhiannon Giddens, Sinematic, Doug MacLeod, Hans Theessink, et al. Imaging was excellent, tone shade was wealthy and lifelike, bass was sensational, and the system was audibly clear to miking and engineering. All in all, it was like a jumbo Alumine 5 SE—and, in fact, a Best of Show contender.

Acora VRC-1

The $220k, granite-bodied, multi-driver Acora Acoustics VRC-1 was one other two-day affair. Driven by VAC electronics, the speaker was a mite sedate on Day One on the crisply plucked guitars of Saturday Night in San Francisco. The VRC-1 additionally had restricted soundstage depth, although stage width was wonderful. My Fabulous Basso LP was fairly good, although Li-Paz sounded a bit extra like a baritone than a basso, and the bass of Rozsnyai’s piano sounded lumped up. On Day Three, after the audio system had settled in (which should’ve examined the Renaissance Schaumburg’s flooring) and the prime listening seat had been moved a lot nearer to the Acoras, the sound was improved in presence. Soundstage depth was nonetheless restricted, and there was nonetheless a little bit of a hump within the 50–80Hz vary. On the Li-Paz D2D LP, for instance, the piano was a bit of free on the underside and never as wealthy in midband harmonics because it might need been. However, Li-Paz sounded extra like a basso, and the general presentation was fairly lifelike.

Vimberg D

Wynn Audio was displaying the $70k Vimberg Tonda D three-way floorstanders, pushed by Karan electronics, sourced by a Kalista CD participant/DAC, and wired with Crystal’s Da Vinci cable. Though a bit of digital sounding total, the Vimberg was additionally extraordinarily clear and impartial, making for a pleasing, if barely analytic hear.

Dynaudio Confidence 50

The five-driver, D’Appolito-configured, $33.5k Dynaudio Confidence 50 floorstander, pushed by Octave monoblocks and sourced by a Sim Audio 780D DAC, was surprisingly candy, delicate, and pure in timbre on digital. Among one of the best reasonably priced cone loudspeakers in my bailiwick, the Confidence 50 was terribly pure on voice. Very near a BOS finalist.

Scaena 12

Finally, the multi-driver, line-array, $106k Scaena 12s with 4 dipole woofers per facet sounded only a bit dated. The woofers didn’t go very deep (e.g., on the bass and synth of The Black Keys “Shine A Light” from Let’s Rock); nor did they mix seamlessly, barely fudging the mids, decreasing transparency, and darkening tone shade.

 

JV’s Best of Show

A tie! Though totally different in sound and know-how, the Clarisys Minuet planar, the MBL 101E MkII omnis, the Magico S3 dynamics, and the Rockport Atria II dynamics all managed the trick of constructing musicians nearly seen—and making music of all sorts a sonic delight. (Note that the Stenheim Reference Ultime 2, the Borresen Acoustics 03, and the Gauder Acoustic DARC 200 have been shut runners-up.)

 

JV’s Best Introduction

Magico S3.

The submit The 2023 AXPONA Show: Jonathan Valin on Speakers $30k and Up appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

DS Audio DS 001 Eccentricity Detection/Correction Device

Since the advent of Thomas Edison’s cylinder-based phonograph in 1877 and Emile Berliner’s disc-based gramophone a decade later, the record player has brought pleasure to untold millions. It is a brilliant invention that literally changed the way the world experiences music. Before it was introduced, a listener had to go to a concert, recital, or dance hall (or be musical enough to play an instrument) to hear an ensemble or a singer and accompanists perform; after the gramophone and the rubber/shellac/vinyl disc became commercial realities, he and his family and friends could enjoy the music of their choosing in their homes any time they wanted.

From the start, the gap between the sound of recordings and the sound of the real thing has been an issue. Back in the day, folks like Edison used to conduct demonstrations in which live vocalists and recorded ones (often recorded to cylinder on the spot) “performed” side by side—to demonstrate how small that gap was. At the time, people were amazed by the verisimilitude of the recordings! Times change, of course, and what was considered highest-fidelity playback at the turn of the twentieth century now sounds coarsely mechanical. The stability and silence with which today’s turntables rotate, the precision with which tonearms and cartridges track grooves, the quality of the recordings themselves are infinitely better—and that chasm between live and Memorex has, indeed, been narrowed.

Still, some things, some drawbacks, haven’t been addressed—and one of the most persistent of them will be the subject of this review.

Today we don’t pay much attention to the wow and flutter figures of turntables. Typically, the rates at which they rotate the LPs atop them have become so precise that frequency and pitch instability (caused by fluctuations in playback speed) aren’t the problems that they once were. However, wow and flutter aren’t only induced by turntables. As REG never tires of pointing out, some degree of eccentricity (the opposite of concentricity or perfect centering) can be—and most likely is—“built into” all your vinyl recordings, either because of a slightly offset spindle hole or an imprecise pressing, in which the puck of heated vinyl was not perfectly centered beneath the stamper, or the stamper itself was slightly canted in its carriage.

Why should the concentricity of an LP be so important? For two reasons. “The first,” in DS Audio’s words, “is that unstable rotation [owed to the eccentricity of the grooves] causes fluctuations in pitch across the frequency range. The second is that if record eccentricity is not corrected, the cartridge and tonearm will sway from side to side as they trace the groove walls, impairing the stylus’ ability to accurately ‘read’ the signals engraved in them,” resulting in “muddiness” and an “unstable sonic image.” DS Audio contends that LP eccentricity can result in wow and flutter values that are “20 times worse than those of a turntable alone.”

So, how come no one’s done something about this longstanding and quite audible problem? Well, someone did. As readers of REG know, in 1983 the Japanese firm Nakamichi introduced its direct-drive Dragon-CT Computing Turntable with integral viscous-damped tonearm. This ingenious device not only measured the eccentricity of LPs (via a separate “sensor tonearm”) but corrected for it by moving the platter itself so that concentricity was made perfect.

Alas, the Nakamichi Dragon-CT is no longer manufactured, though used samples can still be found on the Internet (for a pretty penny). Of course, the Dragon-CT was, by today’s standards, a bit of a one-trick pony (though its trick was phenomenal). Since its drive system and dedicated tonearm were early-80s’ tech, the best contemporary ’tables and ’arms outperform it in every way, save one—that unique ability to measure and correct for the wow and flutter induced by LP eccentricity.

Since Nakamichi’s Dragon-CT, no company I know of has introduced a product that is specifically intended to deal with the almost inevitable eccentricity of LPs. Until now.

Meet the DS Audio ES-001 Eccentricity Detection Stabilizer. At $6000, it ain’t cheap. And, of course, it only does the one thing. But, boy, does it do it well.

Invented by the same DS Audio team (headed by Aki Aoyagi) that has brought you the progressively more and more marvelous DS optical cartridges, the ES-001 is a 2.75″-tall, two-part cylinder that fits over your turntable’s spindle. There is a 2.4″ touchscreen display panel on its top face, a power button near its base, and a rear screw (opened with a supplied Allen wrench) to remove the case when replacing batteries or updating software via a supplied cable.

As noted, the ES-001 has two interconnected and independently articulated parts. The taller section—the case-enclosed chassis—houses the electronics and the two AA batteries; the small cylindrical portion beneath it is intended to rotate with the record, while you hold the large top portion still. Once the ES-001 is turned on and the record and the bottom part of the ES-001 are rotating at speed, you trigger infrared LED lights and sensors built into the chassis to emit and receive beams, which measure the concentricity of the lead-out groove of the LP revolving around them, turning that data into a diagrammatic readout on the touchscreen panel that shows you exactly how eccentric your LP is.

Assuming you have enough play between the turntable spindle and the spindle-hole in the LP, you then turn off the turntable and push the LP in the direction that reduces its eccentricity, as shown on the LED-screen diagram. Keep pushing or wiggling until the words “The center is OK” appear on the screen (some of the time a small nudge is enough to do the trick), and you have now corrected the LP’s eccentricity. If you don’t have enough slack in the spindle hole to push the LP into perfect alignment, DS supplies a reamer that allows you to enlarge the spindle hole so that you have more room to adjust the position of the record. (If it isn’t obvious, be aware that enlarging the spindle hole with the reamer is an irreversible process—not that you’re likely to do any serious damage to your LP, save for making it fit less tightly on the spindle you’re presently using.)

While not unduly massive at 620 grams (1.37 pounds), the ES-001 has enough heft to serve as a record clamp once you’ve finished your measurements and adjustments and turned the device off. Of course, there are myriad dedicated record clamps on the market, all with their own sonic signatures. Whether you prefer the “sound” of the ES-001 when it is used as a clamp will be a personal decision.

One thing that won’t be a matter of opinion, however, is the sound you get after centering your LPs.

The sonic improvement that the ES-001 makes are consistent and consistently positive. They are almost exactly like the differences you see in a photo that was taken with a camera on a tripod and one that was taken handheld. Blur disappears, focus becomes tack-sharp, colors are more distinct and natural, depth of field and of image are clarified, ambient space around images is expanded, and performance/orchestration/recording details that were slightly fudged aren’t anymore. It is really quite a remarkable step toward neutrality and completeness, without which, of course, instruments and instrumentalists don’t sound as realistic.

If the ES-001 has a downside (other than its price), it is a peculiar one. To wit, I’ve been listening to certain LPs for better than 50 years, and I’m used to the way they sound with varying degrees of eccentricity (and varying amounts of wow and flutter) uncorrected. It can be a little disconcerting to hear them with those distortions removed. It may not be particularly absolute sound of me to say this, but, if you’re used to it, a certain amount of blur can be rather lovely, in the way that a pictorialist (as opposed to a realist) photograph or painting can look lovely. It certainly makes an old, favorite recording sound familiar (and not hearing it, doesn’t).

This said, there is no question that the ES-001 is a brilliant and successful bit of engineering. It does exactly what it is intended to do; it is easy to use (once you get the hang of it); and it unquestionably removes blur from and increases the neutrality and completeness of every LP I’ve used it with. If lifelike pitch and timbre, improved image focus, clarified soundstaging, and higher resolution are prime considerations—and how could they not be?—an LP lover could not put $6000 to better use than by purchasing an ES-001. It is not just a work of genius; it is a step change in analog playback and, quite appropriately, one of 2022’s TAS Products of the Year. (For vinyl fans, I’d have to say it is the Product of the Year—or Century.)

Specs & Pricing

Material: Aluminum and tungsten
Power supply: Two AA batteries
User interface: Touch panel (2.4 inch)
Dimensions: 80mm D x 70mm H
Weight: 620g (including batteries)
Price: $6000

MUSICAL SURROUNDINGS (U.S. Distributor)
(510) 547-5006
musicalsurroundings.com

JV’s Reference System
Loudspeakers: MBL 101 X-treme, Stenheim Alumine Five SE, Estelon X Diamond Mk II, Magico M3, Voxativ 9.87, Avantgarde Zero 1, Magnepan LRS+, MG 1.7, and MG 30.7
Subwoofers: JL Audio Gotham (pair)
Linestage preamps: Soulution 725, MBL 6010 D, Siltech SAGA System C1, Air Tight ATE-2001 Reference
Phonostage preamps: Soulution 755, Constellation Audio Perseus, DS Audio Grand Master
Power amplifiers: Soulution 711, MBL 9008 A, Aavik P-580, Air Tight 3211, Air Tight ATM-2001, Zanden Audio Systems Model 9600, Siltech SAGA System V1/P1, Odyssey Audio Stratos, Voxativ Integrated 805
Analog source: Clearaudio Master Innovation, Acoustic Signature Invictus Neo/T-9000, Walker Audio Proscenium Black Diamond Mk V, TW Acustic Black Knight/TW Raven 10.5, AMG Viella 12
Tape deck: Metaxas & Sins Tourbillon T-RX, United Home Audio Ultimate5 OPS
Phono cartridges: DS Audio Grandmaster, DS Audio Master1, DS Audio DS-003 Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement II, Air Tight Opus 1, Ortofon MC Anna, Ortofon MC A90

Digital source: MSB Reference DAC, Soulution 760, Berkeley Alpha DAC 2

Cable and interconnect: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond

Power cords: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond

Power conditioner: AudioQuest Niagara 5000 (two), Synergistic Research Galileo UEF, Ansuz Acoustics DTC, Technical Brain

Support systems: Critical Mass Systems MAXXUM and QXK equipment racks and amp stands and Center Stage2M footers

Room Treatments: Stein Music H2 Harmonizer system, Synergistic Research UEF Acoustic Panels/Atmosphere XL4/UEF Acoustic Dot system, Synergistic Research ART system, Shakti Hallographs (6), Zanden Acoustic panels, A/V Room Services Metu acoustic panels and traps, ASC Tube Traps

Accessories: DS Audio ION-001, SteinMusic Pi Carbon Signature record mat, Symposium Isis and Ultra equipment platforms, Symposium Rollerblocks and Fat Padz, Walker Prologue Reference equipment and amp stands, Walker Valid Points and Resonance Control discs, Clearaudio Double Matrix Professional Sonic record cleaner, Synergistic Research RED Quantum fuses, HiFi-Tuning silver/gold fuses

The post DS Audio DS 001 Eccentricity Detection/Correction Device appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

DS Audio DS 001 Eccentricity Detection/Correction Device

Since the advent of Thomas Edison’s cylinder-based phonograph in 1877 and Emile Berliner’s disc-based gramophone a decade later, the record player has brought pleasure to untold millions. It is a brilliant invention that literally changed the way the world experiences music. Before it was introduced, a listener had to go to a concert, recital, or dance hall (or be musical enough to play an instrument) to hear an ensemble or a singer and accompanists perform; after the gramophone and the rubber/shellac/vinyl disc became commercial realities, he and his family and friends could enjoy the music of their choosing in their homes any time they wanted.

From the start, the gap between the sound of recordings and the sound of the real thing has been an issue. Back in the day, folks like Edison used to conduct demonstrations in which live vocalists and recorded ones (often recorded to cylinder on the spot) “performed” side by side—to demonstrate how small that gap was. At the time, people were amazed by the verisimilitude of the recordings! Times change, of course, and what was considered highest-fidelity playback at the turn of the twentieth century now sounds coarsely mechanical. The stability and silence with which today’s turntables rotate, the precision with which tonearms and cartridges track grooves, the quality of the recordings themselves are infinitely better—and that chasm between live and Memorex has, indeed, been narrowed.

Still, some things, some drawbacks, haven’t been addressed—and one of the most persistent of them will be the subject of this review.

Today we don’t pay much attention to the wow and flutter figures of turntables. Typically, the rates at which they rotate the LPs atop them have become so precise that frequency and pitch instability (caused by fluctuations in playback speed) aren’t the problems that they once were. However, wow and flutter aren’t only induced by turntables. As REG never tires of pointing out, some degree of eccentricity (the opposite of concentricity or perfect centering) can be—and most likely is—“built into” all your vinyl recordings, either because of a slightly offset spindle hole or an imprecise pressing, in which the puck of heated vinyl was not perfectly centered beneath the stamper, or the stamper itself was slightly canted in its carriage.

Why should the concentricity of an LP be so important? For two reasons. “The first,” in DS Audio’s words, “is that unstable rotation [owed to the eccentricity of the grooves] causes fluctuations in pitch across the frequency range. The second is that if record eccentricity is not corrected, the cartridge and tonearm will sway from side to side as they trace the groove walls, impairing the stylus’ ability to accurately ‘read’ the signals engraved in them,” resulting in “muddiness” and an “unstable sonic image.” DS Audio contends that LP eccentricity can result in wow and flutter values that are “20 times worse than those of a turntable alone.”

So, how come no one’s done something about this longstanding and quite audible problem? Well, someone did. As readers of REG know, in 1983 the Japanese firm Nakamichi introduced its direct-drive Dragon-CT Computing Turntable with integral viscous-damped tonearm. This ingenious device not only measured the eccentricity of LPs (via a separate “sensor tonearm”) but corrected for it by moving the platter itself so that concentricity was made perfect.

Alas, the Nakamichi Dragon-CT is no longer manufactured, though used samples can still be found on the Internet (for a pretty penny). Of course, the Dragon-CT was, by today’s standards, a bit of a one-trick pony (though its trick was phenomenal). Since its drive system and dedicated tonearm were early-80s’ tech, the best contemporary ’tables and ’arms outperform it in every way, save one—that unique ability to measure and correct for the wow and flutter induced by LP eccentricity.

Since Nakamichi’s Dragon-CT, no company I know of has introduced a product that is specifically intended to deal with the almost inevitable eccentricity of LPs. Until now.

Meet the DS Audio ES-001 Eccentricity Detection Stabilizer. At $6000, it ain’t cheap. And, of course, it only does the one thing. But, boy, does it do it well.

Invented by the same DS Audio team (headed by Aki Aoyagi) that has brought you the progressively more and more marvelous DS optical cartridges, the ES-001 is a 2.75″-tall, two-part cylinder that fits over your turntable’s spindle. There is a 2.4″ touchscreen display panel on its top face, a power button near its base, and a rear screw (opened with a supplied Allen wrench) to remove the case when replacing batteries or updating software via a supplied cable.

As noted, the ES-001 has two interconnected and independently articulated parts. The taller section—the case-enclosed chassis—houses the electronics and the two AA batteries; the small cylindrical portion beneath it is intended to rotate with the record, while you hold the large top portion still. Once the ES-001 is turned on and the record and the bottom part of the ES-001 are rotating at speed, you trigger infrared LED lights and sensors built into the chassis to emit and receive beams, which measure the concentricity of the lead-out groove of the LP revolving around them, turning that data into a diagrammatic readout on the touchscreen panel that shows you exactly how eccentric your LP is.

Assuming you have enough play between the turntable spindle and the spindle-hole in the LP, you then turn off the turntable and push the LP in the direction that reduces its eccentricity, as shown on the LED-screen diagram. Keep pushing or wiggling until the words “The center is OK” appear on the screen (some of the time a small nudge is enough to do the trick), and you have now corrected the LP’s eccentricity. If you don’t have enough slack in the spindle hole to push the LP into perfect alignment, DS supplies a reamer that allows you to enlarge the spindle hole so that you have more room to adjust the position of the record. (If it isn’t obvious, be aware that enlarging the spindle hole with the reamer is an irreversible process—not that you’re likely to do any serious damage to your LP, save for making it fit less tightly on the spindle you’re presently using.)

While not unduly massive at 620 grams (1.37 pounds), the ES-001 has enough heft to serve as a record clamp once you’ve finished your measurements and adjustments and turned the device off. Of course, there are myriad dedicated record clamps on the market, all with their own sonic signatures. Whether you prefer the “sound” of the ES-001 when it is used as a clamp will be a personal decision.

One thing that won’t be a matter of opinion, however, is the sound you get after centering your LPs.

The sonic improvement that the ES-001 makes are consistent and consistently positive. They are almost exactly like the differences you see in a photo that was taken with a camera on a tripod and one that was taken handheld. Blur disappears, focus becomes tack-sharp, colors are more distinct and natural, depth of field and of image are clarified, ambient space around images is expanded, and performance/orchestration/recording details that were slightly fudged aren’t anymore. It is really quite a remarkable step toward neutrality and completeness, without which, of course, instruments and instrumentalists don’t sound as realistic.

If the ES-001 has a downside (other than its price), it is a peculiar one. To wit, I’ve been listening to certain LPs for better than 50 years, and I’m used to the way they sound with varying degrees of eccentricity (and varying amounts of wow and flutter) uncorrected. It can be a little disconcerting to hear them with those distortions removed. It may not be particularly absolute sound of me to say this, but, if you’re used to it, a certain amount of blur can be rather lovely, in the way that a pictorialist (as opposed to a realist) photograph or painting can look lovely. It certainly makes an old, favorite recording sound familiar (and not hearing it, doesn’t).

This said, there is no question that the ES-001 is a brilliant and successful bit of engineering. It does exactly what it is intended to do; it is easy to use (once you get the hang of it); and it unquestionably removes blur from and increases the neutrality and completeness of every LP I’ve used it with. If lifelike pitch and timbre, improved image focus, clarified soundstaging, and higher resolution are prime considerations—and how could they not be?—an LP lover could not put $6000 to better use than by purchasing an ES-001. It is not just a work of genius; it is a step change in analog playback and, quite appropriately, one of 2022’s TAS Products of the Year. (For vinyl fans, I’d have to say it is the Product of the Year—or Century.)

Specs & Pricing

Material: Aluminum and tungsten
Power supply: Two AA batteries
User interface: Touch panel (2.4 inch)
Dimensions: 80mm D x 70mm H
Weight: 620g (including batteries)
Price: $6000

MUSICAL SURROUNDINGS (U.S. Distributor)
(510) 547-5006
musicalsurroundings.com

JV’s Reference System
Loudspeakers: MBL 101 X-treme, Stenheim Alumine Five SE, Estelon X Diamond Mk II, Magico M3, Voxativ 9.87, Avantgarde Zero 1, Magnepan LRS+, MG 1.7, and MG 30.7
Subwoofers: JL Audio Gotham (pair)
Linestage preamps: Soulution 725, MBL 6010 D, Siltech SAGA System C1, Air Tight ATE-2001 Reference
Phonostage preamps: Soulution 755, Constellation Audio Perseus, DS Audio Grand Master
Power amplifiers: Soulution 711, MBL 9008 A, Aavik P-580, Air Tight 3211, Air Tight ATM-2001, Zanden Audio Systems Model 9600, Siltech SAGA System V1/P1, Odyssey Audio Stratos, Voxativ Integrated 805
Analog source: Clearaudio Master Innovation, Acoustic Signature Invictus Neo/T-9000, Walker Audio Proscenium Black Diamond Mk V, TW Acustic Black Knight/TW Raven 10.5, AMG Viella 12
Tape deck: Metaxas & Sins Tourbillon T-RX, United Home Audio Ultimate5 OPS
Phono cartridges: DS Audio Grandmaster, DS Audio Master1, DS Audio DS-003 Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement II, Air Tight Opus 1, Ortofon MC Anna, Ortofon MC A90

Digital source: MSB Reference DAC, Soulution 760, Berkeley Alpha DAC 2

Cable and interconnect: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond

Power cords: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond

Power conditioner: AudioQuest Niagara 5000 (two), Synergistic Research Galileo UEF, Ansuz Acoustics DTC, Technical Brain

Support systems: Critical Mass Systems MAXXUM and QXK equipment racks and amp stands and Center Stage2M footers

Room Treatments: Stein Music H2 Harmonizer system, Synergistic Research UEF Acoustic Panels/Atmosphere XL4/UEF Acoustic Dot system, Synergistic Research ART system, Shakti Hallographs (6), Zanden Acoustic panels, A/V Room Services Metu acoustic panels and traps, ASC Tube Traps

Accessories: DS Audio ION-001, SteinMusic Pi Carbon Signature record mat, Symposium Isis and Ultra equipment platforms, Symposium Rollerblocks and Fat Padz, Walker Prologue Reference equipment and amp stands, Walker Valid Points and Resonance Control discs, Clearaudio Double Matrix Professional Sonic record cleaner, Synergistic Research RED Quantum fuses, HiFi-Tuning silver/gold fuses

The post DS Audio DS 001 Eccentricity Detection/Correction Device appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

2022 Golden Ear: Stenheim Alumine Five SE Dynamic Loudspeaker

Stenheim Alumine Five SE Dynamic Loudspeaker

$72,000

Just last year I had the pleasure of reviewing one of the best cone loudspeakers I’ve heard—the $78k, three-way, three-driver Estelon X Diamond Mk II. As luck would have it, I had the exact same experience this year, thanks to the Swiss company Stenheim.

Though also a three-way floorstander, Stenheim’s Alumine Five SE is otherwise quite different than Estelon’s X Diamond II. For one thing it has a hefty (220-pound!), damped aluminum chassis, where the Estelon’s is made of a hefty (190-pound!) slurry of acrylic and marble. For another, the Stenheim’s aluminum enclosure is shaped into a conventional rectangular box, unlike the Estelon’s fabulous, near-inaudible, hourglass-shaped one. For a third, the Alumine Five SE is modest in size—less than four-feet tall, one-foot wide, and a foot-and-a-quarter deep—where the Estelon is considerably taller, wider, and deeper. For a fourth, the Stenheim uses “old-fashioned” paper- and fabric-cone drivers (two slot-loaded 10″ woofers, one 6.5″ midrange, and one 1″ fabric-dome tweeter), once again unlike Estelon’s latter-day ceramic-sandwich and diamond Accutons.

On the surface, the Alumine Five SE looks like a chunky little schoolgirl, but, as I say in my review, it is actually a chunky little stick of dynamite. With a near-hornlike sensitivity of 94dB/1W/1m and a relatively stable 8-ohm impedance, the Alumine Five SE is capable of simply phenomenal dynamics—unexceeded in speed, power, and nuance by any cone speaker that I’ve reviewed, regardless of size, configuration, or price. When coupled with what may be the most extended, naturally colored, well-defined-in-pitch bass I’ve heard from a ported loudspeaker (only the Estelon contends), it’s explosively “alive”-sounding. From the low end (down to 30Hz) through the mid-treble, it is capable of dynamic swings that go from 0-to-60 in the blink of an eye. It is also simply gorgeous in tonality (just a little on the bottom-up side), minutely detailed, and unusually three-dimensional in imaging. There isn’t a thing about this phenomenal loudspeaker I don’t like. As was the case with the X Diamond Mk II, it is a standard-setter, only it doesn’t require quite as much square footage behind and around it as the larger Estelon does to perform its magic tricks.

If you listen in a smallish-to-medium-sized space and want the whole enchilada—and not just a taste—without compromise in speed, extension, beauty, resolution, and realism, I can’t think of another cone loudspeaker that will beat this one out. It not only wins one of my Golden Ear awards for 2022, but it will also certainly be my nominee for TAS’ 2022 Loudspeaker of the Year Award—indeed, for Overall Product of the Year.

The post 2022 Golden Ear: Stenheim Alumine Five SE Dynamic Loudspeaker appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

2022 Golden Ear: Stenheim Alumine Five SE Dynamic Loudspeaker

Stenheim Alumine Five SE Dynamic Loudspeaker

$72,000

Just last year I had the pleasure of reviewing one of the best cone loudspeakers I’ve heard—the $78k, three-way, three-driver Estelon X Diamond Mk II. As luck would have it, I had the exact same experience this year, thanks to the Swiss company Stenheim.

Though also a three-way floorstander, Stenheim’s Alumine Five SE is otherwise quite different than Estelon’s X Diamond II. For one thing it has a hefty (220-pound!), damped aluminum chassis, where the Estelon’s is made of a hefty (190-pound!) slurry of acrylic and marble. For another, the Stenheim’s aluminum enclosure is shaped into a conventional rectangular box, unlike the Estelon’s fabulous, near-inaudible, hourglass-shaped one. For a third, the Alumine Five SE is modest in size—less than four-feet tall, one-foot wide, and a foot-and-a-quarter deep—where the Estelon is considerably taller, wider, and deeper. For a fourth, the Stenheim uses “old-fashioned” paper- and fabric-cone drivers (two slot-loaded 10″ woofers, one 6.5″ midrange, and one 1″ fabric-dome tweeter), once again unlike Estelon’s latter-day ceramic-sandwich and diamond Accutons.

On the surface, the Alumine Five SE looks like a chunky little schoolgirl, but, as I say in my review, it is actually a chunky little stick of dynamite. With a near-hornlike sensitivity of 94dB/1W/1m and a relatively stable 8-ohm impedance, the Alumine Five SE is capable of simply phenomenal dynamics—unexceeded in speed, power, and nuance by any cone speaker that I’ve reviewed, regardless of size, configuration, or price. When coupled with what may be the most extended, naturally colored, well-defined-in-pitch bass I’ve heard from a ported loudspeaker (only the Estelon contends), it’s explosively “alive”-sounding. From the low end (down to 30Hz) through the mid-treble, it is capable of dynamic swings that go from 0-to-60 in the blink of an eye. It is also simply gorgeous in tonality (just a little on the bottom-up side), minutely detailed, and unusually three-dimensional in imaging. There isn’t a thing about this phenomenal loudspeaker I don’t like. As was the case with the X Diamond Mk II, it is a standard-setter, only it doesn’t require quite as much square footage behind and around it as the larger Estelon does to perform its magic tricks.

If you listen in a smallish-to-medium-sized space and want the whole enchilada—and not just a taste—without compromise in speed, extension, beauty, resolution, and realism, I can’t think of another cone loudspeaker that will beat this one out. It not only wins one of my Golden Ear awards for 2022, but it will also certainly be my nominee for TAS’ 2022 Loudspeaker of the Year Award—indeed, for Overall Product of the Year.

The post 2022 Golden Ear: Stenheim Alumine Five SE Dynamic Loudspeaker appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Synergistic Research SRX Speaker Cables, Interconnects, and Power Cords

Better than a decade-and-a-half ago, Synergistic Research’s chief cook and bottle washer, Ted Denney, came out with a cable the likes of which I’d never seen or heard before. It was called the Galileo System. Physically, what set this wire apart was the use of strands of different metals (copper/silver alloy, pure silver, pure gold, and pure platinum) that weren’t twisted or bundled together, as they are in every other brand of wire I’m familiar with, but separated into what Denney called “air strings.” In part because these individually jacketed strands of wire weren’t interwoven into massive braids, crosstalk was reduced, capacitance and inductance lowered, skin effects diminished, and transparency to sources greatly increased. The sonic superiority of its unique materials and geometry made the Galileo System a benchmark. It was the best wire I’d heard at that time and remains one of the most innovative products I’ve reviewed.

Synergistic Research’s new top-line SRX cable is the latest descendant of Denney’s extraordinary original, and it, too, is very special. Like Galileo, each SRX speaker cable uses thin, individually jacketed air strings (two made from a monocrystal silver-copper alloy, four from 14AWG silver, and four from mono-filament silver), that are separated from one another by perforations in an evenly spaced series of carbon-fiber discs, through which the strands run without physically contacting each other (or walls, shelves, and flooring). Where the air strings in Galileo cable were routed, via LEMO connectors, into and out of free-standing electromagnetic power-conditioning/active-shielding junction boxes (called “Active Mini EM Cells”) that themselves were plugged into “quantum tunneled” Mini Power Coupler power supplies (wall-wart-like devices that provided the DC current for the active shielding and EM power conditioning of the cells and the precious-metal “strings” attached to them), the SRXes are, blessedly, simpler in construction. Their air strings run out of and into a pair of barrel-shaped carbon-fiber tuning modules—passive devices which, in addition to providing conditioning and shielding, have two plugs (one each for the positive and negative legs of the cable) that allow you to attach cylindrical gold and silver “tuning bullets” to further voice the system. This provision for voicing, which is very nearly unique to Synergistic Research products, unquestionably works—and works in the ways that SR claims it does, with the gold bullets adding warmth and body to the sound and the silver bullets resolution and extension. For anyone with a difficult room or picky componentry or a marked preference for acoustic or electric music, SRX’s “tuneability” can be a blessing.

Like the speaker cable, SRX interconnect uses thin, individually jacketed air strings (one of 10AWG monocrystal silver-copper and five of monocrystal silver), each separated from the others by perforated carbon-fiber discs. In addition to a provision for attaching tuning “bullets,” the interconnects have another set of wires that can be plugged into Synergistic’s active Galileo SX Ground Block—to improve shielding and further lower noise.

The only item in the SRX lineup that superficially resembles products from other manufacturers’ cable lines is the power cord, though even here looks are deceiving. Though it does not make use of “air strings,” each cord comprises a nine-gauge composite of silver conductors for hot and neutral runs, including a long, flat, silver-ribbon EM (electromagnetic) cell and two folded EM cells for what SR claims amounts to a “pure-silver line conditioner in an AC cable format.” Like the cable and interconnect, the power cords can be voiced via Synergistic’s tuning “bullets,” and like the interconnect it can be connected to an SX Ground Block for lower noise and better shielding.

A few months ago, I reviewed Crystal Cable’s very pricey, top-of-the-line Art Series Da Vinci cable, interconnect, and power cords, which for me set new standards of fidelity. Since then, I’ve been able to audition a complete loom of SRX in my upstairs MBL reference system, and while the Crystal and the Synergistic aren’t sonically identical, they do sound an awful lot alike, clearly sharing a property that is key to their excellence. To wit, they are both extremely low in noise (and high in resolution).

As Robert and I have said in print (and Alan Taffel talks about in his Metronome DSC review in this issue), the lowering of noise is, across the board, the chief improvement in today’s high-end offerings. For examples, the elimination of RF in DS Audio’s optical cartridges, the lowering of jitter, phase, and quantization errors in DACs from Wadax, MSB, Soulution, Berkeley Audio, etc., the reduction of EMI, IM, TIM, and THD in high-bandwidth solid-state electronics from Soulution, CH Precision, darTZeel, etc., the use of aluminum, carbon-fiber, stone, acrylics, and other non-resonant materials in speaker cabinets from companies like Magico, Stenheim, Estelon, Rockport, YG, etc., and the application of carbon fiber, synthetic diamond, ceramic, and other low-resonance/high-stiffness substances in dynamic-driver diaphragms have, independently and together, reduced distortions and colorations that we simply took for granted in the old days, elevating what I’ve called “completeness” and “neutrality” to new heights.

This does not mean that pieces of high-end gear are without sonic “characters” of their own—i.e., that all of today’s components sound alike. What it does mean is that the differences in sonics among the best high-end products are, for the most part, less marked than they once were and that rather than reflecting unique distortion profiles they are the results of deliberate decisions about parts, materials, layout, manufacture, and voicing. As similar in sound as they are in many ways, the presentations of amps from Soulution, CH Precision, and Constellation are still easily distinguishable from each other, but that is not because one or the other of the trio has more (or less) THD.

This same paradigm holds true for Da Vinci and SRX cabling. Where Crystal’s top-of-the-line achieved its astonishing vanishing act primarily through metallurgical advances, Synergistic SRX earns its laurels primarily through the unique geometries I’ve discussed above. This is not to say that either cable shortchanges the other’s areas of strengths, just that their designers’ foci are slightly different, including their respective ideas about what best constitutes a replica of the absolute sound. Crystal’s Edwin Rynveld has what I would call a “fidelity to sources” (or accuracy-first) mindset. For him, the object is to lower noises that alter and obscure the original signal, and measurable differences are his primary standards of comparison. Synergistic’s Ted Denney has more of an “as you like it” (or “musicality-first”) slant. As his provisions for markedly different voicings show, his intent is to provide the listener with a sound that can accommodate individual tastes, rooms, and ancillary gear. Ironically, perhaps, both approaches end up in the same sonic ballpark, which, to reiterate, means that Da Vinci and SRX sound more alike than different—especially on an initial audition. Over time, however, each reveals its own character. Which of them you’ll prefer may be more a matter of taste (and pocketbook) than across-the-board sonic superiority.

For example, Da Vinci has a density of tone, particularly through the low end, midbass, and power range, that I simply   haven’t heard to the same lifelike extent from any other wire. Like Soulution amplification, there is a timbral richness and three-dimensional solidity to its bottom octaves that is quite natural and appealing. I should note, however, that (as with Soulution electronics) this exceptional low-end color and weight tend to give Da Vinci a slightly “bottom-up” tonal balance, a bit of a “darker” overall character (though, as you will see, nothing is scanted in the midband or on top).

Though voicing with gold bullets can bring the SRX quite a bit closer to Crystal’s darker, more granitic presentation, the Synergistic wire is fundamentally less bottom-up in character than the Crystal Cable offering. This is not to say that SRX is anything like “thin” sounding; it is not. Indeed, its bass and power-range timbre are downright gorgeous; its focus and grip in the bottom octaves may even be very slightly higher than that of the Crystal Cable. As a result, details about Fender guitar performance-technique—picking, fingering, plucking, and slapping—are (sometimes) a bit clearer.

There is an irony to this, actually, because up until Denney’s last generation of Galileo from several years back, Synergistic cable, too, had a “bottom-up” tonal balance, a slightly “dark” overall character. Not anymore. Indeed, “unvoiced” (without bullets) it is the most neutral wire that Denney has yet produced—and certainly, as noted, the lowest in noise and coloration and highest in resolution. I’m not going to claim that it outdoes Da Vinci in this last regard, but it is, as I’ve said, a bit more tightly focused, which (minus the somewhat fuller power-range/bass weight of Da Vinci) tends to clarify transient detail.

In the midband there is little to choose between these two remarkable wires. They are both exceedingly realistic sounding, capable (with the best sources) of fooling you into thinking you are in the presence of actual musicians. Not only do they reproduce timbre with lifelike density; they also reproduce the dynamic/harmonic envelope (from starting transient through steady-state tone to decay) with lifelike duration, without adding, for instance, “zip” or ringing to hard transients, sibilance to frictatives of higher pitch or amplitude, or smearing to decays. This is the very essence of “completeness”—and the reason why you can not just readily visualize singers like Sinatra on Sinatra at the Sands through both wires; you can also tell the way he is using his mic (like that geisha fan he compared it to) to shape, punctuate, and convey the emotional power of his delivery.

On top, the Synergistic and the Crystal Cable are, once again, very similar. With the best sources, both are extremely finely nuanced. When two things come this close to identity, it’s hard to distinguish one from the other. Having said this, I would guess that Da Vinci (or Crystal’s also superior Ultimate Dream) is just a smidgeon softer and sweeter at the very top, and that Synergistic’s SRX is just a bit airier and more extended.

Both are superb imagers and soundstagers; both reproduce the dynamic range of recordings with high accuracy; both are astonishingly realistic sounding with great tapes, LPs, and streams; and both lower noises and colorations to unprecedented levels.

So…where does that leave you?

Well, to begin with you’ve got to be rich to afford either one of these extraordinary looms of wire. However, for what it is worth, SRX is a good deal less expensive than Da Vinci (e.g., an eight-foot pair of SRX speaker cable costs $29,995; a two-meter pair of Da Vinci speaker cable is a staggering $46,500). If a $16.5k difference means anything to you (and if it doesn’t, my congratulations), then I’d certainly opt for the SRX. If, on the other hand, you’re rolling in dough and have a near-psychotic lack of self-control when it comes to spending it, well…Da Vinci is a hair richer in the bass and power range.

One difference that isn’t a matter of taste or guesswork is convenience. Because of its simpler geometry and lighter weight, Da Vinci is easier to set up and use (and less space-consuming) than SRX. There are no voicing bullets on Da Vinci, no grounding plugs, no multiple strands, no perforated carbon-fiber discs. It is what it is, with no provisions to adjust its sound.

Which brings us to a crux. As I’ve already noted, Edwin Rynveld perfects his products by measurement. The lower the calculable noise floor, the more he feels he’s succeeded. Though he also tests his creations extensively (see the interview to the left), Ted Denney makes his products for real-world users, whose varied systems and musical tastes he attempts to accommodate with voicing options. It’s kind of like the difference between a Soulution amplifier and an amplifier from CH Precision. The former comes with no provision for changing its sound; the latter can be “tuned” to taste via adjustments in feedback, gain, and other variables. Depending on your room, gear, and musical preferences, SRX’s tuneability (which, ideally, requires the assistance of a knowledgeable dealer for setup) may be a real plus.

Assuming you’ve got the moolah (and a spouse without a power of attorney), I can’t tell you which of these sonically similar but physically and functionally different cables to buy. Both Synergistic Research SRX and Crystal Cable Da Vinci are honest-to-God great—along with Crystal’s Ultimate Dream (which the Da Vincis replaced), the best wires I’ve heard. What I can say is this: Denney has long claimed to be able to build cables, interconnects, and power cords that will equal or exceed those of the competition for half the money. In this instance, he has proven his point. Co-winner of TAS’ Cable of the Year Award in 2022, Synergistic Research’s SRX is one of my references—and a worthy successor to Denney’s original, standard-setting Galileo.

Specs & Pricing

Synergistic SRX
Speaker Cable: $29,995 per 8′ pair
Interconnect: $12,995 per meter pair
Power cable: $10,000 per 6′

SYNERGISTIC RESEARCH
synergisticresearch.com

JV’s Reference System
Loudspeakers: MBL 101 X-treme, Stenheim Alumine Five SE, Estelon X Diamond Mk II, Magico M3, Voxativ 9.87, Avantgarde Zero 1, Magnepan LRS+, MG 1.7, and MG 30.7
Subwoofers: JL Audio Gotham (pair)
Linestage preamps: Soulution 725, MBL 6010 D, Siltech SAGA System C1, Air Tight ATE-2001 Reference
Phonostage preamps: Soulution 755, Constellation Audio Perseus, DS Audio Grand Master
Power amplifiers: Soulution 711, MBL 9008 A, Aavik P-580, Air Tight 3211, Air Tight ATM-2001, Zanden Audio Systems Model 9600, Siltech SAGA System V1/P1, Odyssey Audio Stratos, Voxativ Integrated 805
Analog source: Clearaudio Master Innovation, Acoustic Signature Invictus Jr./T-9000, Walker Audio Proscenium Black Diamond Mk V, TW Acustic Black Knight/TW Raven 10.5, AMG Viella 12
Tape deck: Metaxas & Sins Tourbillon T-RX, United Home Audio Ultimate 4 OPS
Phono cartridges: DS Audio Grandmaster, DS Audio Master1, DS Audio DS-003 Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement, Air Tight Opus 1, Ortofon MC Anna, Ortofon MC A90
Digital source: MSB Reference DAC, Soulution 760, Berkeley Alpha DAC 2
Cable and interconnect: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond
Power cords: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond
Power conditioner: AudioQuest Niagara 5000 (two), Synergistic Research Galileo UEF, Ansuz Acoustics DTC, Technical Brain
Support systems: Critical Mass Systems MAXXUM and QXK equipment racks and amp stands and CenterStage2M footers
Room treatments: Stein Music H2 Harmonizer system, Synergistic Research UEF Acoustic Panels/Atmosphere XL4/UEF Acoustic Dot system, Synergistic Research ART system, Shakti Hallographs (6), Zanden Acoustic panels, A/V Room Services Metu acoustic panels and traps, ASC Tube Traps
Accessories: DS Audio ION-001, SteinMusic Pi Carbon Signature record mat, Symposium Isis and Ultra equipment platforms, Symposium Rollerblocks and Fat Padz, Walker Prologue Reference equipment and amp stands, Walker Valid Points and Resonance Control discs, Clearaudio Double Matrix Professional Sonic record cleaner, Synergistic Research RED Quantum fuses, HiFi-Tuning silver/gold fuses

The post Synergistic Research SRX Speaker Cables, Interconnects, and Power Cords appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Synergistic Research SRX Speaker Cables, Interconnects, and Power Cords

Better than a decade-and-a-half ago, Synergistic Research’s chief cook and bottle washer, Ted Denney, came out with a cable the likes of which I’d never seen or heard before. It was called the Galileo System. Physically, what set this wire apart was the use of strands of different metals (copper/silver alloy, pure silver, pure gold, and pure platinum) that weren’t twisted or bundled together, as they are in every other brand of wire I’m familiar with, but separated into what Denney called “air strings.” In part because these individually jacketed strands of wire weren’t interwoven into massive braids, crosstalk was reduced, capacitance and inductance lowered, skin effects diminished, and transparency to sources greatly increased. The sonic superiority of its unique materials and geometry made the Galileo System a benchmark. It was the best wire I’d heard at that time and remains one of the most innovative products I’ve reviewed.

Synergistic Research’s new top-line SRX cable is the latest descendant of Denney’s extraordinary original, and it, too, is very special. Like Galileo, each SRX speaker cable uses thin, individually jacketed air strings (two made from a monocrystal silver-copper alloy, four from 14AWG silver, and four from mono-filament silver), that are separated from one another by perforations in an evenly spaced series of carbon-fiber discs, through which the strands run without physically contacting each other (or walls, shelves, and flooring). Where the air strings in Galileo cable were routed, via LEMO connectors, into and out of free-standing electromagnetic power-conditioning/active-shielding junction boxes (called “Active Mini EM Cells”) that themselves were plugged into “quantum tunneled” Mini Power Coupler power supplies (wall-wart-like devices that provided the DC current for the active shielding and EM power conditioning of the cells and the precious-metal “strings” attached to them), the SRXes are, blessedly, simpler in construction. Their air strings run out of and into a pair of barrel-shaped carbon-fiber tuning modules—passive devices which, in addition to providing conditioning and shielding, have two plugs (one each for the positive and negative legs of the cable) that allow you to attach cylindrical gold and silver “tuning bullets” to further voice the system. This provision for voicing, which is very nearly unique to Synergistic Research products, unquestionably works—and works in the ways that SR claims it does, with the gold bullets adding warmth and body to the sound and the silver bullets resolution and extension. For anyone with a difficult room or picky componentry or a marked preference for acoustic or electric music, SRX’s “tuneability” can be a blessing.

Like the speaker cable, SRX interconnect uses thin, individually jacketed air strings (one of 10AWG monocrystal silver-copper and five of monocrystal silver), each separated from the others by perforated carbon-fiber discs. In addition to a provision for attaching tuning “bullets,” the interconnects have another set of wires that can be plugged into Synergistic’s active Galileo SX Ground Block—to improve shielding and further lower noise.

The only item in the SRX lineup that superficially resembles products from other manufacturers’ cable lines is the power cord, though even here looks are deceiving. Though it does not make use of “air strings,” each cord comprises a nine-gauge composite of silver conductors for hot and neutral runs, including a long, flat, silver-ribbon EM (electromagnetic) cell and two folded EM cells for what SR claims amounts to a “pure-silver line conditioner in an AC cable format.” Like the cable and interconnect, the power cords can be voiced via Synergistic’s tuning “bullets,” and like the interconnect it can be connected to an SX Ground Block for lower noise and better shielding.

A few months ago, I reviewed Crystal Cable’s very pricey, top-of-the-line Art Series Da Vinci cable, interconnect, and power cords, which for me set new standards of fidelity. Since then, I’ve been able to audition a complete loom of SRX in my upstairs MBL reference system, and while the Crystal and the Synergistic aren’t sonically identical, they do sound an awful lot alike, clearly sharing a property that is key to their excellence. To wit, they are both extremely low in noise (and high in resolution).

As Robert and I have said in print (and Alan Taffel talks about in his Metronome DSC review in this issue), the lowering of noise is, across the board, the chief improvement in today’s high-end offerings. For examples, the elimination of RF in DS Audio’s optical cartridges, the lowering of jitter, phase, and quantization errors in DACs from Wadax, MSB, Soulution, Berkeley Audio, etc., the reduction of EMI, IM, TIM, and THD in high-bandwidth solid-state electronics from Soulution, CH Precision, darTZeel, etc., the use of aluminum, carbon-fiber, stone, acrylics, and other non-resonant materials in speaker cabinets from companies like Magico, Stenheim, Estelon, Rockport, YG, etc., and the application of carbon fiber, synthetic diamond, ceramic, and other low-resonance/high-stiffness substances in dynamic-driver diaphragms have, independently and together, reduced distortions and colorations that we simply took for granted in the old days, elevating what I’ve called “completeness” and “neutrality” to new heights.

This does not mean that pieces of high-end gear are without sonic “characters” of their own—i.e., that all of today’s components sound alike. What it does mean is that the differences in sonics among the best high-end products are, for the most part, less marked than they once were and that rather than reflecting unique distortion profiles they are the results of deliberate decisions about parts, materials, layout, manufacture, and voicing. As similar in sound as they are in many ways, the presentations of amps from Soulution, CH Precision, and Constellation are still easily distinguishable from each other, but that is not because one or the other of the trio has more (or less) THD.

This same paradigm holds true for Da Vinci and SRX cabling. Where Crystal’s top-of-the-line achieved its astonishing vanishing act primarily through metallurgical advances, Synergistic SRX earns its laurels primarily through the unique geometries I’ve discussed above. This is not to say that either cable shortchanges the other’s areas of strengths, just that their designers’ foci are slightly different, including their respective ideas about what best constitutes a replica of the absolute sound. Crystal’s Edwin Rynveld has what I would call a “fidelity to sources” (or accuracy-first) mindset. For him, the object is to lower noises that alter and obscure the original signal, and measurable differences are his primary standards of comparison. Synergistic’s Ted Denney has more of an “as you like it” (or “musicality-first”) slant. As his provisions for markedly different voicings show, his intent is to provide the listener with a sound that can accommodate individual tastes, rooms, and ancillary gear. Ironically, perhaps, both approaches end up in the same sonic ballpark, which, to reiterate, means that Da Vinci and SRX sound more alike than different—especially on an initial audition. Over time, however, each reveals its own character. Which of them you’ll prefer may be more a matter of taste (and pocketbook) than across-the-board sonic superiority.

For example, Da Vinci has a density of tone, particularly through the low end, midbass, and power range, that I simply   haven’t heard to the same lifelike extent from any other wire. Like Soulution amplification, there is a timbral richness and three-dimensional solidity to its bottom octaves that is quite natural and appealing. I should note, however, that (as with Soulution electronics) this exceptional low-end color and weight tend to give Da Vinci a slightly “bottom-up” tonal balance, a bit of a “darker” overall character (though, as you will see, nothing is scanted in the midband or on top).

Though voicing with gold bullets can bring the SRX quite a bit closer to Crystal’s darker, more granitic presentation, the Synergistic wire is fundamentally less bottom-up in character than the Crystal Cable offering. This is not to say that SRX is anything like “thin” sounding; it is not. Indeed, its bass and power-range timbre are downright gorgeous; its focus and grip in the bottom octaves may even be very slightly higher than that of the Crystal Cable. As a result, details about Fender guitar performance-technique—picking, fingering, plucking, and slapping—are (sometimes) a bit clearer.

There is an irony to this, actually, because up until Denney’s last generation of Galileo from several years back, Synergistic cable, too, had a “bottom-up” tonal balance, a slightly “dark” overall character. Not anymore. Indeed, “unvoiced” (without bullets) it is the most neutral wire that Denney has yet produced—and certainly, as noted, the lowest in noise and coloration and highest in resolution. I’m not going to claim that it outdoes Da Vinci in this last regard, but it is, as I’ve said, a bit more tightly focused, which (minus the somewhat fuller power-range/bass weight of Da Vinci) tends to clarify transient detail.

In the midband there is little to choose between these two remarkable wires. They are both exceedingly realistic sounding, capable (with the best sources) of fooling you into thinking you are in the presence of actual musicians. Not only do they reproduce timbre with lifelike density; they also reproduce the dynamic/harmonic envelope (from starting transient through steady-state tone to decay) with lifelike duration, without adding, for instance, “zip” or ringing to hard transients, sibilance to frictatives of higher pitch or amplitude, or smearing to decays. This is the very essence of “completeness”—and the reason why you can not just readily visualize singers like Sinatra on Sinatra at the Sands through both wires; you can also tell the way he is using his mic (like that geisha fan he compared it to) to shape, punctuate, and convey the emotional power of his delivery.

On top, the Synergistic and the Crystal Cable are, once again, very similar. With the best sources, both are extremely finely nuanced. When two things come this close to identity, it’s hard to distinguish one from the other. Having said this, I would guess that Da Vinci (or Crystal’s also superior Ultimate Dream) is just a smidgeon softer and sweeter at the very top, and that Synergistic’s SRX is just a bit airier and more extended.

Both are superb imagers and soundstagers; both reproduce the dynamic range of recordings with high accuracy; both are astonishingly realistic sounding with great tapes, LPs, and streams; and both lower noises and colorations to unprecedented levels.

So…where does that leave you?

Well, to begin with you’ve got to be rich to afford either one of these extraordinary looms of wire. However, for what it is worth, SRX is a good deal less expensive than Da Vinci (e.g., an eight-foot pair of SRX speaker cable costs $29,995; a two-meter pair of Da Vinci speaker cable is a staggering $46,500). If a $16.5k difference means anything to you (and if it doesn’t, my congratulations), then I’d certainly opt for the SRX. If, on the other hand, you’re rolling in dough and have a near-psychotic lack of self-control when it comes to spending it, well…Da Vinci is a hair richer in the bass and power range.

One difference that isn’t a matter of taste or guesswork is convenience. Because of its simpler geometry and lighter weight, Da Vinci is easier to set up and use (and less space-consuming) than SRX. There are no voicing bullets on Da Vinci, no grounding plugs, no multiple strands, no perforated carbon-fiber discs. It is what it is, with no provisions to adjust its sound.

Which brings us to a crux. As I’ve already noted, Edwin Rynveld perfects his products by measurement. The lower the calculable noise floor, the more he feels he’s succeeded. Though he also tests his creations extensively (see the interview to the left), Ted Denney makes his products for real-world users, whose varied systems and musical tastes he attempts to accommodate with voicing options. It’s kind of like the difference between a Soulution amplifier and an amplifier from CH Precision. The former comes with no provision for changing its sound; the latter can be “tuned” to taste via adjustments in feedback, gain, and other variables. Depending on your room, gear, and musical preferences, SRX’s tuneability (which, ideally, requires the assistance of a knowledgeable dealer for setup) may be a real plus.

Assuming you’ve got the moolah (and a spouse without a power of attorney), I can’t tell you which of these sonically similar but physically and functionally different cables to buy. Both Synergistic Research SRX and Crystal Cable Da Vinci are honest-to-God great—along with Crystal’s Ultimate Dream (which the Da Vincis replaced), the best wires I’ve heard. What I can say is this: Denney has long claimed to be able to build cables, interconnects, and power cords that will equal or exceed those of the competition for half the money. In this instance, he has proven his point. Co-winner of TAS’ Cable of the Year Award in 2022, Synergistic Research’s SRX is one of my references—and a worthy successor to Denney’s original, standard-setting Galileo.

Specs & Pricing

Synergistic SRX
Speaker Cable: $29,995 per 8′ pair
Interconnect: $12,995 per meter pair
Power cable: $10,000 per 6′

SYNERGISTIC RESEARCH
synergisticresearch.com

JV’s Reference System
Loudspeakers: MBL 101 X-treme, Stenheim Alumine Five SE, Estelon X Diamond Mk II, Magico M3, Voxativ 9.87, Avantgarde Zero 1, Magnepan LRS+, MG 1.7, and MG 30.7
Subwoofers: JL Audio Gotham (pair)
Linestage preamps: Soulution 725, MBL 6010 D, Siltech SAGA System C1, Air Tight ATE-2001 Reference
Phonostage preamps: Soulution 755, Constellation Audio Perseus, DS Audio Grand Master
Power amplifiers: Soulution 711, MBL 9008 A, Aavik P-580, Air Tight 3211, Air Tight ATM-2001, Zanden Audio Systems Model 9600, Siltech SAGA System V1/P1, Odyssey Audio Stratos, Voxativ Integrated 805
Analog source: Clearaudio Master Innovation, Acoustic Signature Invictus Jr./T-9000, Walker Audio Proscenium Black Diamond Mk V, TW Acustic Black Knight/TW Raven 10.5, AMG Viella 12
Tape deck: Metaxas & Sins Tourbillon T-RX, United Home Audio Ultimate 4 OPS
Phono cartridges: DS Audio Grandmaster, DS Audio Master1, DS Audio DS-003 Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement, Air Tight Opus 1, Ortofon MC Anna, Ortofon MC A90
Digital source: MSB Reference DAC, Soulution 760, Berkeley Alpha DAC 2
Cable and interconnect: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond
Power cords: CrystalConnect Art Series Da Vinci, Crystal Cable Ultimate Dream, Synergistic Research SRX, Ansuz Acoustics Diamond
Power conditioner: AudioQuest Niagara 5000 (two), Synergistic Research Galileo UEF, Ansuz Acoustics DTC, Technical Brain
Support systems: Critical Mass Systems MAXXUM and QXK equipment racks and amp stands and CenterStage2M footers
Room treatments: Stein Music H2 Harmonizer system, Synergistic Research UEF Acoustic Panels/Atmosphere XL4/UEF Acoustic Dot system, Synergistic Research ART system, Shakti Hallographs (6), Zanden Acoustic panels, A/V Room Services Metu acoustic panels and traps, ASC Tube Traps
Accessories: DS Audio ION-001, SteinMusic Pi Carbon Signature record mat, Symposium Isis and Ultra equipment platforms, Symposium Rollerblocks and Fat Padz, Walker Prologue Reference equipment and amp stands, Walker Valid Points and Resonance Control discs, Clearaudio Double Matrix Professional Sonic record cleaner, Synergistic Research RED Quantum fuses, HiFi-Tuning silver/gold fuses

The post Synergistic Research SRX Speaker Cables, Interconnects, and Power Cords appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

2022 Golden Ear: DS Audio DS 003 Optical Phono Cartridge

DS Audio DS 003 Optical Phono Cartridge

$2500 ($6000 with matching equalizer)

After setting new standards of fidelity in the ultra-high end with his POY-winning $15,000 Grand Master optical cartridge (and $45k, two-box Grand Master equalizer), DS Audio’s ingenious Tetsuaki “Aki” Aoyagi has turned his attention to the rest of us.  The $2500 DS 003 ($6k with its matching DS 003 equalizer) is a “trickle-down” masterpiece. Using many of the technical innovations first found in the Grand Master (such as a dual-mono optical generator with independent LEDs and photo detectors for each channel and a beryllium “shading plate,” which reduces moving mass to 1/10th that of a typical moving-coil cartridge), the “third-generation” 003 sounds almost exactly like a slightly less finely detailed, slightly less spacious Grand Master. Every bit as standard-settingly quiet, explosively dynamic, and robustly rich in color as its big brother, the DS 003 makes opting (or optical’ing) for a new-tech oc a lot easier (and a lot less of a trade-off) than it once was. With channel separation measurably approaching 33dB in the midrange and tracking that is as smooth and glitch-free as that of the far pricier Grand Master, the DS 003 does not compromise soundstaging and trackability in the ways that earlier-gen, “affordable” DS Audios did. If you’ve longed to sample a top-line oc but haven’t had the moolah to do so, now’s your chance. The DS 003 opens the door—and opens it wide—to a new world of noise-free, tape-like playback, with bass response and treble sweetness and bloom that you could previously only get with reel-to-reel. Another sure-fire nominee for a 2022 TAS Product of the Year Award.

The post 2022 Golden Ear: DS Audio DS 003 Optical Phono Cartridge appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

2022 Golden Ear: DS Audio DS 003 Optical Phono Cartridge

DS Audio DS 003 Optical Phono Cartridge

$2500 ($6000 with matching equalizer)

After setting new standards of fidelity in the ultra-high end with his POY-winning $15,000 Grand Master optical cartridge (and $45k, two-box Grand Master equalizer), DS Audio’s ingenious Tetsuaki “Aki” Aoyagi has turned his attention to the rest of us.  The $2500 DS 003 ($6k with its matching DS 003 equalizer) is a “trickle-down” masterpiece. Using many of the technical innovations first found in the Grand Master (such as a dual-mono optical generator with independent LEDs and photo detectors for each channel and a beryllium “shading plate,” which reduces moving mass to 1/10th that of a typical moving-coil cartridge), the “third-generation” 003 sounds almost exactly like a slightly less finely detailed, slightly less spacious Grand Master. Every bit as standard-settingly quiet, explosively dynamic, and robustly rich in color as its big brother, the DS 003 makes opting (or optical’ing) for a new-tech oc a lot easier (and a lot less of a trade-off) than it once was. With channel separation measurably approaching 33dB in the midrange and tracking that is as smooth and glitch-free as that of the far pricier Grand Master, the DS 003 does not compromise soundstaging and trackability in the ways that earlier-gen, “affordable” DS Audios did. If you’ve longed to sample a top-line oc but haven’t had the moolah to do so, now’s your chance. The DS 003 opens the door—and opens it wide—to a new world of noise-free, tape-like playback, with bass response and treble sweetness and bloom that you could previously only get with reel-to-reel. Another sure-fire nominee for a 2022 TAS Product of the Year Award.

The post 2022 Golden Ear: DS Audio DS 003 Optical Phono Cartridge appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Select your currency