Tag Archives: Audio Reviews

SMSL iCON iPhone DAC/Headphone Amplifier Review

About a year ago I replaced my iPhone 6 with an iPhone 8. While I enjoyed the added capabilities, better battery life, and speed of the 8, one thing I missed almost immediately was the headphone output jack. The 6 had one the 8 does not, so you are forced to either use a wireless headphone or add a lightning dongle or outboard DAC via the Apple lightning connection for personal listening. Since I upgraded to the iPhone 8, I’ve used an assortment of DACs, such as the AudioQuest Dragonfly Red, which require an Apple-certified lighting to USB adapter to operate successfully. I’ve also used a bunch of Bluetooth earphones, but so far the best combination of low price, convenience, and good sonics for my iPhone has been from a dedicated lightning connected DAC from S.M.S.L., the MFI-certified Icon ($54.99 MSRP).

I obtained my review sample from Drop (formally Massdrop) for the “deeply discounted” price of $47 with shipping. Not the biggest discount in the world, but I went for it because I was tired of having to hunt down one of several lightning to USB adapters to use an outboard DAC with the iPhone. I got it from Drop because Amazon was out of stock (with no idea when they would see more) and the only other sources were all China-based sales sites. While I’ve purchased successfully from AliExpress many times, I wanted some more local support options.

Setting Up the S.M.S.L. iCON iPhone DAC

 To use the iCON DAC/headphone amp all you need to do is plug it in and attach a pair of headphones to its 3.5mm stereo mini output and you’re done. Powered by the iPhone, the Icon was able to drive my most demanding headphones, the 600-ohm Beyer-Dynamic DT-990, to well above my own max listening levels with every commercial music release I tried. On a couple of my own recordings, I did have to max out the volume settings, but I heard no added distortion even at these maxed-out levels. With my most sensitive CIEMs, the 115 dB sensitivity Empire Ears Zeus, I heard no noise, hiss, or hum even when I turned the volume up to full with no music playing.

How Does the S.M.S.L. iCON iPhone DAC Perform?

 The heart of the Icon is a Cirrus Logic CS42L42 chip capable of PCM up to 192/24 and DSD 128. It also includes provisions to sense whether your connected headphone has a microphone so you can accept phone while using the Icon. There is also an internal microphone for headphones without their own mic. The headphone amplifier is a class AB model that can modify its output depending on the incoming signal into a class H to conserve power. One feature that the SMSL Icon does lack is MQA capabilities, so Tidal users will have to settle for CD-quality. I was able to get 48/24, 96/24, and 192/24 output from Qobuz, however.

SMSL even created its own app for the Icon. For those without an alternative streaming/playback app, it will serve, but if you have Tidal, Qobuz, or Roon, you already have a better playback app than SMSL option. The Icon itself has an aluminum body. Its top panel has three buttons for volume up/volume down, play/pause, and app control. There’s also a small blue light that lets you know whether it’s getting power. When playing a music file, the light will blink. The 11.8-inch cable is permanently attached on one end of the Icon while the 3.5mm headphone output is on the other end. 

Charlie Puth accompanied by Boyz II Men on “If You Leave Me Now” shows off the Icon’s ability to place vocals precisely in the soundstage. Also, the Icon’s presentation has enough detail to hear how Puth’s vocals are processed with a pitch control while Boyz II Mens’ vocals are not. You can easily hear how natural the second lead vocal is compared to the first lead by Puth.

YouTube Video

 On Mike Posner’s “Cooler Than Me” via Tidal or Qobuz through the Icon with revealing earphones, you’llbe able to appreciate how well-recorded, -mixed, and -mastered the original recorded version is It has depth, imaging, and decent dynamics for a pop release.

YouTube Video

High Points:

  • The beauty of the Icon is no additional dongles or adapters are needed for iOS devices equipped with a lightning connector.
  • The DAC/HPA delivers good depth and imaging, as well as the right amount of dynamic punch to make pop music sound much better than what you would get from the iPhone alone (using the Lighting-to-3.5mm adapter).
  • The overall sonic profile is natural and neutral, with plenty of detail.

The Downside

  • Unlike the AudioQuest Dragonfly DAC, which can be used both connected to a phone or a desktop DAC with a USB output, the Icon was designed to work only with an iPhone.
  • With highly sensitive earphones, such as the Empire Ears Zeus, you may find that finding the exact right listening volume as bit of a challenge. The Zeus requires so little output that the incremental volume increases may be a bit too great to find the ideal level. With Billie Eilish’s “Therefore I Am” single via Tidal three pushes of the volume level results in a tiny bit lower level than I’d like, but the next increment upwards is too loud for me.
  • Unlike the Dragonfly, Chord Qutest, or IFI DACs, there is no easy color-coded way to know what the bit-depth and sample rate of a recording while it’s being played back via the Icon without opening your playback app

How Does the S.M.S.L. iCON Compare to the Competition?

The S.M.S.L. iCON ranks as the least expensive no-worries and no-apologies iOS-centric DAC currently available. Sure, you can pay less and get the Apple Lightning audio adapter. But it does not perform as well overall, especially with harder to drive headphones.

HiDizs has a Dongle DAC ($49 MSRP), but it will require a Lightning-to-USB-C adapter for use with an iOS device.

You can pay more and move up to an AudioQuest Dragonfly ($99, $199, $299) or Helm Encore ($199). The Dragonfly line and Helm DACs have greater flexibility due to their more universal USB input. If you want a DAC that can go from phone to desktop PC, one of these would be a better option.

Final Thoughts 

If you want to listen to music via your current-generation iOS device, you have two options: Bluetooth or an Apple-Certified Lightning DAC/headphone device. Bluetooth, especially when mated with aptX HD, can sound very good, but it is still a lossy format. Using the full capabilities of Qobuz it’s possible to get bit-perfect lossless 192/24 files played back from an iOS device via the SMSL Icon. With Tidal, the Icon was only capable of 44.1/16 since it lacks MQA decoding. If you are a Qobuz subscriber, the Icon may well eliminate your need for an additional dedicated portable player for streaming high-resolution music.

 If you want an inexpensive one-piece outboard DAC/headphone amp for your iOS device, I recommend the SMSL Icon. It’s a pleasure to use, works with a wide variety of earphones, and provides an elegant and good-sounding single-box connection solution to the dilemma of using newer iOS devices with wired earphones. The Icon could be the perfect addition to your collection of iOS portable music essentials.

Check out other S.M.S.L products at the Apos Audio store.

Rotel RA-1572 Integrated Amplifier Review

If you’re in the market for a good stereo integrated amplifier and you’re not already sold on a particular brand, you could do lot worse than simply shopping around in Rotel’s current lineup and picking the model that best fits your needs and your budget. As long as you don’t expect your integrated amp to also serve as a full-blown media streamer, the company has something for everyone, starting with the amazing little A11 Tribute ($799.99) — which sports an all-analog design and sound tuned by industry legend Ken Ishiwata before his death in late 2019 — all the way up to the RA-1592 ($2,999.99), a beastly 200Wpc powerhouse with oodles of digital connectivity.

Somewhere in between those two extremes sits the RA-1572 ($1,999.99), which lacks some of the RA-1592’s oomph (120Wpc instead of 200Wpc, both Class AB) and a few of its digital inputs (two optical and two coaxial digital inputs instead of three each), as well as one fewer line-level RCA input (four instead of five), but otherwise holds its own with Rotel’s integrated flagship.

At the heart of the RA-1572 is an AKM DAC chip with DSD and 768kHz/32-bit PCM decoding capabilities, accessible via the rear-panel USB port. The optical and coaxial inputs can also handle PCM up to 192/24, and the front-panel USB is designed for compatibility with iOS devices.

The unit also features a Bluetooth antenna, although the only codecs it supports are aptX and SBC. One of its analog inputs also serves as a MM phono stage, and there’s even a balanced XLR in.

Setting up the Rotel RA-1572

The one place Rotel definitely isn’t going to win any awards is in the industrial design category. The RA-1572, in either silver or black, is hardly an eyesore, but its aesthetic could best be described as utilitarian, at least up front. Its façade is a flat but thick slab of aluminum that gets the job done, housing the LCD screen, volume knob, source-select buttons, speaker A/B switches, and menu controls.

Things are a little sexier around back, especially if you’re a binding-post fetishist like me. The RA-1572’s speaker connections are chonky and gorgeous, and should accommodate your preferred connection method. In my case, I mated the integrated amp with my pair of Paradigm Studio 100 v5 towers by way of a pair of banana-terminated ELAC Sensible Speaker Cables.

The RA-1572 is feature-rich in terms of control connectivity, with an RS-232 port, Ethernet port for IP control and firmware updates, two 12v triggers, a 3.5mm IR input, and Rotel Link inputs and outputs. The integrated amp also features dual mono subwoofer outs, as well as stereo preamp outputs, along with a Type-B USB port labeled “PC-USB.”

In keeping with Rotel tradition, the amp features numerous setup options that allow you to customize and personalize it for your needs. In addition to the expected balance and bass/treble controls, the amp also benefits from niceties such as power-on volume defaults, auto-off timer presets (with your choice of 1, 2, 5, or 12 hours), and the ability to change its Aux, USB, PC-USB, Optical, Coaxial, and Bluetooth inputs to fixed volume.

By default, the PC-USB input is set to Class 1.0, meaning it won’t decode anything higher than 96/24 PCM, but it’s easy enough to switch it over to Class 2.0 operation via the menus. If you need drivers, Rotel provides them for Windows XP, Vista, 7, and 10 on its website.

How does the Rotel RA-1572 sound?

If you’ll forgive me a bit of an aside here, allow me to break the normal flow of Home Theater Review’s standard review template for a bit of real talk. I prefer to approach any new product review with a completely open mind. I don’t read previously published reviews, if others have beaten me to the punch. I don’t look at measurements. I even try my best to avoid letting my impression of other gear from the same manufacturer influence my subjective evaluation of any new product I’m reviewing. That said, I’m part of the larger consumer electronics enthusiast community. I hear things. And one of the things I’ve heard about the RA-1572 from certain circles is that it lacks something in terms of timing and dynamic punch.

Maybe you could clear that sort of accusation from your mind, but I’m not quite that mentally disciplined, so my first goal with this integrated amp was to gauge the validity of these claims. A great test for this — all of this — is “Spoonman” from Soundgarden’s Superunknown (20th Anniversary edition via Qobuz, 192/24). Granted, this isn’t exactly what you’d call audiophile bait, but especially toward the end of the track, as the cutlery and wood-block percussion start their chaotic swirl around and through the soundstage, if there’s anything temporally awry, you’ll hear it. You’ll lose that holographic quality to the percussion. You’ll lose that precise placement of the instruments.

YouTube Video

The RA-1572’s delivery of the track frankly fell short in exactly zero ways. I’m puzzled as to where these accusations of temporal muddiness originated, and after a few hours playing Superunknown again and again and again at nigh-uncomfortable listening levels, I’m ready to call shenanigans.

In terms of dynamics, I absolutely couldn’t ask for more than what this integrated amp delivers, especially with the galloping percussion in the verses. The RA-1572 rocks. It swings. It has exceptional bass authority, a wonderful sense of coherence, fantastic transient response. Simply put, it gives what it gets.

YouTube Video

It also does no editorializing. Frankly, that’s my preference. I have, at times, extoled the virtues of integrated amps that inject a bit of their own magic into the music, but I always come back to components that neither add nor subtract. That does mean that albums with particularly poor mastering (I’m looking at you, Tesla’s Mechanical Resonance) aren’t always the most fun to listen to. The RA-1572’s transparency and neutrality kinda reveal every flaw in this recording, especially its thinness and lack of detail, despite its shrill upper end.

The flipside to that is that really well-recorded and well-mastered albums sound all the sweeter. With the title track from Marvin Gaye’s What’s Going On (Qobuz, 192/24), you get to revel in that delicious sense of space and inimitable groove that simply don’t translate via lesser gear. The specificity of the imaging on this track is simply astounding via the RA-1572, putting in in league with much more expensive gear I’ve auditioned recently, like Marantz’s PM-KI Ruby, which sells for twice as much.

The downside

While the performance of the RA-1572 is exceptional across the board, I do have some nits to pick about a few operational quirks and a handful of disappointments in terms of the amp’s feature set.

First things first, I really wish Rotel included AAC among its supported Bluetooth codecs. The significantly cheaper A11 Tribute does both AAC and aptX, so it’s hard to shake the feeling that the RA-1572 should, too. LDAC along with some of the higher-quality iterations of aptX would be appreciated, but I think AAC and bog-standard aptX are the bare minimum for a product of this nature. It was really disappointing to cast to the amp from my iPhone and see the SBC logo light up.

Not that I would really use the Bluetooth input all that much. Like other Rotel gear I’ve auditioned, the RA-1572 self-mutes when you’re on the BT input but no music is playing. This not only means that you miss the first second or so of a song, but the pausing and unpausing are also accompanied by an audible click.

I also wish the amp had a quarter-inch headphone jack instead of 3.5mm. And I wish that its headphone output automatically muted the output of the speakers when I plugged in a set of cans. If you want to listen to headphones and you don’t want music to also pour out of your speakers, you have to use the A/B select buttons on the remote or the unit itself to mute the in-room sound.

How Does the Rotel RA-1572 compare to the competition?

I mentioned the Marantz PM-KI Ruby above, so we may as well start there. At $3,999, it costs a good bit more than the Rotel piece, but it delivers very similar performance overall. The biggest difference between the two is that the RA-1572 lacks the PM-KI Ruby’s pitch-black background. Then again, the Marantz piece lacks the Rotel’s digital connectivity. If you want a USB input or any other form of digital connectivity, you’ll also have to shell out for the SA-KI Ruby, which adds another $4,000 to the equation.

If that’s a bit rich for your blood but you need a bit more than the RA-1572 delivers, there’s also Rotel’s step-up RA-1592 ($2,999.99), the details of which I covered in the introduction.

At or around the same price of the RA-1572, I also quite like Peachtree Audio’s nova300 ($2,199), which relies on Class D ICEPower modules to deliver a staggering 300 watts per channel into 8 ohms. It also features a USB input designed for iOS devices, as well as a Type-B USB port for connecting to a computer, although it’s a little more limited in terms of other digital connectivity, with only one coax and two optical inputs. Switching between Class 1.0 and Class 2.0 USB operation is also handled via a switch on the back of the chassis. It only has two line-level stereo inputs, one of them a MM phono input. But my goodness, this thing is gorgeous. In terms of the industrial design, Peachtree’s products are among my favorites.

Final thoughts

I know I’ve used this line before here in the pages of Home Theater Review, but in my time with the Rotel RA-1572, I kept going back to that famous quip from Han Solo: “She may not look like much, but she’s got it where it counts, kid!” Granted, nobody would accuse Rotel’s mid-tier integrated amp of being a bucket of bolts, and it’s certainly more reliable than the Millennium Falcon, but in every other respect, it has a lot in common with that mythical space freighter: It’s got undeniable retro swagger, it’s a little bit fussy to operate at times, but its performance is out of this world.

RBH PM-8 Powered Studio Monitor Review

RBH PM-8

Though RBH markets its PM-8 speaker as a “Powered Studio Monitor,” its design actually puts it in the “active speaker” category. Oftentimes used interchangeably, the distinction needs to be made, since the Venn diagram of active and powered speakers is not a circle. Simply put: an active speaker is always powered, but a powered speaker is not necessarily active. When it comes to a pair of PM-8s, there is no master speaker and a passive counterpart, and each benefit from digital crossovers and separate amplification for each driver.

The PM-8 is equipped with an 8-inch aluminum cone mid/woofer, Class D amplification that supplies 150 watts to the AMT tweeter and 250 watts to the subwoofer, balanced XLR inputs and throughout, and DSP controls (including Finite Impulse Response filters). The speaker has a frequency response of 32Hz to 20kHz, commensurate with its hefty size. Each weighs 43.35 pounds and stands nearly 20 inches tall, making a pair of them hard to miss, which may or may not work for you, depending on your room setup and intended use.

Configuring the RBH PM-8

Since I tested the PM-8s for personal use and not professional studio sessions, the setup was relatively simple and smooth. Source components included an Apollo Twin USB DAW and 2014 MacBook Pro for Apple Music and Spotify Connect. I opted not to connect a subwoofer for this review.

RBH doesn’t provide optional stands for the monitors, but if there’s anything I’ve learned during my short time in the vast and hyper-specific audiophile world, stands are sacrosanct, and if you’re using them in a room that gets a lot of foot traffic, sturdy stands are an absolute must. So, the sizeable PM-8s were sitting pretty in the living room atop a pair of Argosy Spire 360Xi Studio Monitor Stands. The pair of PM-8s I reviewed had one monitor with composite side panels, and another without – the two available finish options for the speaker – and truly, both are equally attractive and could be fit into a home theater setup or studio arrangement easily – it just depends whether you prefer shiny or matte. Though the composite panels are supposed to minimize cabinet vibrations and as a result enhance sound, I really could not tell a difference between the two when isolating and A/Bing between them.

How does the RBH PM-8 sound?

Something that remains at the forefront of my mind when listening to new speakers is whether or not the music has been fundamentally changed. At most, a mix’s qualities should be enhanced, not disguised – minimal makeup versus an eighteenth-century powdered face. Thankfully, and unsurprisingly, the PM-8s forgo the Marie Antoinette routine and, generally, the genius of my music choices was magnified but not altered.

A perfect example of this would be Lana Del Rey’s 2014 Ultraviolence. Produced in part by one half of The Black Keys, Dan Auerbach, Ultraviolence’s depth is often dismissed. When I cued up the deluxe edition on the PM-8s, however, the album was truly given new life, and my middle-school self smiled smugly at Del Rey’s detractors. Florida Kilos,” a sultry ode to one of Del Ray’s favorite topics (drugs), comes through so smoothly and powerfully, I felt like I’d really only heard half of the percussive choices till I heard the song through the PM-8s.

Similarly, “West Coast,” a fan-favorite love letter to the hippie hideouts of the Golden State, finds new depth and takes advantage of the monitors’ impressive imaging abilities. Del Rey may very well be a “studio artist” (agree to disagree) but the PM-8s make you feel like the singer is right there in the room with you.

YouTube Video

Another album that well and truly floored me was Florence + the Machine’s 2018 LP, High As Hope. An album generally ignored within the artist’s repertoire, High As Hope is more muted than the band’s bigger hits, but it’s a perfect example of how important dynamic range is. “Big God” is the album’s spotlight of Welch’s ability to hit a lower register, and though the song is relatively simple, there’s so much going on in the background that’s easy to miss. The eeriness of the piano and the song’s exploration of abandonment is brought to the forefront, and the cleverly mixed-in strings sample from Simon Benson & Peter Cox’s “Azure-Blue” probably would not grab you by the throat and make you feel something if it weren’t for the PM-8s’s authority. Welch’s transition from soft to forceful vocals and everything between is perfectly captured by the monitors, as is the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it inclusion of Kamasi Washington on tenor sax. 

YouTube Video

Next, I turned to Thom Yorke’s “Hearing Damage,” from the New Moon soundtrack. The distortion and tendency towards high-frequency sounds makes this track a tricky bastard, in that even on the best setup, the song simply has a tendency toward harshness in keeping with its name. I was relieved to learn the PM-8s passed the biggest treble test I gave them. Yorke’s vocals are perfectly set against the song’s percussion at the forefront, and the monitors registered every ounce of low-end distortion and hit of the hi-hat with beauty and precision. 

YouTube Video

Similarly, Tori Amos’s “Cornflake Girl,” and “Crucify,” both featured on A Tori Amos Collection – Tales of a Librarian, reach impressively high highs and low lows within their relatively short lengths, and the PM-8s in no way neglect either end of the audible spectrum. The sleigh bell-laden percussion track and flute solo of “Cornflake Girl” contrast against the deeper piano and bass riffs, but instead of making the mix sound jarring or discordant, the monitors bring smaller aspects to the forefront and blend the opposing sounds together well. 

“Crucify,” a song that relies almost entirely on a speaker’s ability to provide perfect depth as well as imaging, comes out crystal clear and bass-laden, exactly as it should.

As mentioned briefly above, the monitors’ ability to convey space is so prevalent it feels like a crime to not try and test those limits. Enter Lykke Li’s brand of outside-the-box pop, exhibited most fiercely in 2011’s Wounded Rhymes, a staple in every alt aficionado’s collection.

 “Youth Knows No Pain,” a masterpiece on its own, is a shock to the system via the PM-8s. Li’s steady soprano glides steadily against the constant bass drum and tambourine, and the percussive presence of “Sadness Is a Blessing” feels much more imposing, in the best way possible. The monitors mask nothing, Li’s voice remains the focus, but every other element is allowed to shine, and any listener could pick out each and every hit of a cymbal or piano key as if it were its own isolated track. As someone who has listened to this particular record as if it were written just for me and across every system I can, believe me when I say there’s truly something special about the way it’s rendered on the PM-8s.

YouTube Video

 When it came to rock music, the PM-8s unsurprisingly shone. As someone who appreciates and even prefers big sound, I loved throwing a wide variety of rock at the PM-8s to see what they could handle (spoiler: they took it all and then some). Type O Negative’s 1993 single “Christian Woman” is a great example of the range that rock can have, not to mention a true masterpiece. Peter Steele’s raspy-soft vocals play so well against Kenny Hickey’s hard-hitting guitar – there’s no push and pull, both incredibly powerful elements are center-stage, and the only distortion detected is the band’s signature gothic metal sound, which favors a harsher aesthetic. Even the most discerning metalhead would be pleased to hear how well this criminally underappreciated band images with these monitors.

YouTube Video

The downside 

It’s very hard to find something wrong with RBH’s take on the active studio monitor. Are they really large? Sure. Do they absolutely kick the ass of every speaker I’ve listened to recently? Also, yes. If you’re looking for an active monitor for use in a home theater setup, however, these may not be your best bet. Though they are versatile and magnificent-sounding, they are, at the end of the day, studio monitors, and not the most user-friendly for AV applications. 

Additionally, the lack of coordinating stands is a minor hitch, but may throw some off, especially since RBH’s studio monitor stand offering leaves a bit to be desired when it comes to stability. You certainly don’t need $500 stands, but you might want to invest in something to keep these guys elevated and secure. 

How does the RBH PM-8 compare to the competition?

Most other active studio monitors on the market are built with dome tweeters, not AMTs, so if that specific aspect matters most to you, the RBH PM-8s reign supreme when it comes to price point and sound capabilities. 

If the tweeter construction isn’t an issue for you, but price is, the best studio monitor that offers similar sound capabilities at a relatively lower price would be the JBL 750P active studio monitors ($99/each). However, its frequency range is relatively limited by comparison – as expected – and output is understandably much lower. 

The Focal Solo6 Be may be the closest match in specs and price ($1,499/each), but that specific monitor is intended for nearfield use, so it’s not as versatile as the RBH.

Final thoughts

I’ve raved enough about the sound for the message to come across loud and clear, but it bears repeating: the PM-8s are very much next-level, at least when it comes to do-it-all, powerhouse monitors. Verifiably elegant for a pair of bulky cabinets, the PM-8s hold up against a wide range of music, and never seem to falter or make you think, “does this song sound better in my car?” – a thought I have most definitely had at times with other speakers. Though a bit on the pricier side, the monitors seem appropriately priced at $1,995.95 each with composite side panels, and $1,595.95 each without.

Some may choose to go the more traditional route and opt for a pair of bookshelf speakers geared towards a more traditional setup, but if you’re looking for high performance speakers that don’t force you to fret over finding the right amp, the PM-8s are most certainly worth your consideration.

Bose Smart Soundbar 300 Reviewed

The Bose Smart Soundbar 300 ($399.95) is  about as simple a one-piece audio solution as you could hope for. It took longer to get out of the box than it did to get it working. Plug the power cable in and then connect to your TV either via the included digital optical cable or HDMI ARC (you’ll need to buy your own cable if you go that route) and after selecting the proper settings in your TV’s labyrinthine menus (including turning off the on-board speakers), you’ll have an upgraded audio experience without the fuss or muss of a component sound system (or most soundbars these days, for that matter). Of course, you’ll have to tinker a little more if you want to access features like the Bose Music App, Voice4Video, SimpleSync, and additional connectivity via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Apple AirPlay 2, and Spotify Connect, but even adding those services are relatively straightforward and easy to access. We will dig into those features and benefits later in this review. 

The soundbar measures 2.25 inches high by 27.5 wide by 4 inches deep and weighs 7 pounds. There are four “full range” drivers – one in each end cap and two flanking the tweeter in the center – and a whole lot of baffles and processing engineered to create a spacious, enveloping sound with an emphasis on dialogue intelligibility. What Bose is going for here is simplicity and clarity. If you want more low-frequency impact to reproduce explosions and the bass line of your favorite EDM tracks, you can add the Bose Bass Module 500 ($359) or Bose Bass Module 700 ($699), though the more expensive bass module is much preferred . And for enhanced spaciousness and immersion, you can add the Bose Surround Speakers ($299). All are wireless, though it should be noted that the surround speakers are wired to a common receiver, so they will require a speaker wire connection to that wireless receiver as well as power for the receiver. The soundbar can be positioned on a tabletop or wall-mounted with the optional Bose Soundbar Wall Bracket ($40.00). 

Continuing with the emphasis on simplicity, the remote features 8 buttons: Power on/off, volume up and down, Mute, TV (input select), Bluetooth (input select), Music (Bose Music App select), and Play / Pause / Skip Forward / Skip Back. There are also dedicated microphone on/off and power on/off buttons on the soundbar itself. 

How does the Bose Smart Soundbar 300 sound?

Clarity and intelligibility are front and center – literally – of the Bose Smart Soundbar 300’s overall sonic character. In these respects, I would put the SB300 (as Bose refers to this product) on equal footing with the best of the dozens of soundbars I have reviewed recently. To put this to the test, I sat down to re-watch Christopher Nolan’s Tenet again, since my first viewing was marred by an inability to hear important dialogue since the music and effects are so out front and much of the expository is sotto voce. 

My first experience with Tenet was in my home theater, which has a full-on 5.1.4 Dolby Atmos system. It is a tribute to Bose’s articulation in the mids and mid-highs that I was able to understand much more of the dialogue via the SB300. No, not all of it, as Nolan intentionally obscures some of the dialogue. But at least it was better. 

YouTube Video

This prompted me to do some comparisons with the Yamaha YAS-209 I recently reviewed here. Again, I must rate the dialogue reproduction of the Smart Soundbar 300 just a bit clearer and more intelligible, but the sound field and effects impact of the Yamaha were superior. Yes, the YAS-209 has an included subwoofer, but fair is fair, and the Yamaha is $50 less expensive before adding on the Bose Bass Module 500, and a whopping $400 less if you do opt to reinforce the 300’s bottom end. 

Bluetooth pairing was quick, easy, and reliable. My iPhone discovered the Bose soundbar as soon as I selected Bluetooth from the Smart Soundbar 300 remote. I opened the music app, selected a song, and it started playing straightaway. But music revealed inadequacies in terms of spaciousness and low frequency extension  a lot more than did movies. Thin and narrow is how I would describe the overall music performance. 

The same is true when using Pandora or TuneIn via the Bose Music app or using Spotify Connect or AirPlay 2. It’s nice to have all these options to stream, but they don’t make up for the limitations in sonic quality to the Bose one-piece design. 

The Bose Music app does include a basic EQ section, but even after concentrated experimentation I was not able to get the rich, full sound I was looking for. Low-frequencies start to drop off at 60 Hz and then more steeply from 33 Hz to 28 Hz where they plummet so steeply that there is hardly any bass energy generated from the soundbar at all below 55 Hz. This is with the EQ settings flat and at an overall volume level just short of too loud for the medium -sized room where my testing took place. 

Adjusting the bass level in the EQ section of the Bose Music app was not much help, as the mids get muddy and the highs start to lose their definition – along with dialogue intelligibility takes a hit, long before the bass can make any meaningful impact. For movies and TV low-frequency effects, you simply won’t get the intended the satisfying punch other systems offer and even music reproduction was a bit lacking as there can be a lot lost below 40 Hz across many musical genres. Still, it’s worth noting that if you’re shopping for a soundbar that delivers music well, the Bose 300 as a one-piece solution may not be your best pick without the add-on bass module. There are two available, the Bose Bass Module 700 and Bose Bass Module 500.

A unique feature of note and value is what Bose calls SimpleSync. To quote from the online manual: It lets you connect a single pair of Bluetooth headphones or a single speaker or soundbar to play along with your Bose smart speaker. While many Bluetooth speakers and headphones can connect via SimpleSync, many Bose products are optimized to play sound in sync with your Bose smart speaker. A full list can be found here

In my opinion, the greatest value of SimpleSync is to connect to a supported Bose headphone, in cases where you might not want to wake the baby or the neighbors, for example. 

Then there is Voice4Video, which works with Amazon’s Alexa voice assistant. This allows you to control your TV, or a source device like your cable or satellite box, with just your voice. Hands-free calling is also enabled so long as you have an Amazon Echo device on the same Wi-Fi network. There is also some compatibility with Google’s assistant but no support for Apple’s Siri. 

High Points

  • In terms of delivering clear and intelligible dialogue, the Bose Smart Soundbar 300 is best-in-class.
  • Setup is as easy as anyone could hope for. The one-piece Smart Soundbar 300 will be up and running in less than ten minutes.
  • The soundbar offers an impressive array of source options, and Voice4Video and SimpleSync are great features

Low Points

  • Audio quality, especially for music, is thin and the sound field is narrow. 
  • The system lacks the 360-degree immersion of other soundbars that include surround speakers and, in some cases, up-firing height channel drivers. 
  • The lack of ethernet connectivity means that music services must be connected via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.

How does the Bose Smart Soundbar 300 compare with the competition?

The Sonos Beam ($399) offers one-piece design and simple two cable set-up, voice control (Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant), and interconnectivity with all other Sonos speakers. You can add a pair of One SL speakers  ($179 each) for surrounds and the Sub ($699) for low frequency extension, or just purchase the Surround Set for a bundled price of $1,359. This works out to a $300 premium over the Bose system. The Beam alone offers deeper, more impactful bass and a wider sound field than the Bose Smart Soundbar 300, but the latter’s dialogue is just a bit clearer and setup just a bit quicker and easier. Sonos products are available in black or white. 

The Vizio SB36512-F6 is a four-piece, Dolby Atmos soundbar package that includes a wireless sub, which then feeds a pair of surround speakers. The soundbar sports up-firing height channel speakers to create a more immersive surround sound experience. It works with Google Assistant and includes Bluetooth and Chromecast wireless connectivity. 

The Yamaha YAS-209 ($349.95) is a soundbar/wireless subwoofer package with Amazon Alexa capability. The YAS-209 soundbar alone will give you a wider sound field than the Bose SB300, and the included wireless subwoofer provides the thump and punch a soundbar alone just can’t match. 

Final thoughts

Bose has always commanded a premium price by virtue of its storied legacy and Apple-like “it just works” approach to sound reproduction. The Smart Soundbar 300 has a lot of features that make this an undeniable upgrade to the paltry sound that comes from your HDTV. If a simple setup and clear, intelligible dialogue are the two most important reasons you are in the market for a soundbar, this is a top-contender. 

Review: Tribit QuietPlus 78 Wireless Active Noise Cancelling Headphones

You could be forgiven if you mistook Tribit for one of those Chinese OEMs making “me too” collections of audio products that litter Amazon’s listings. After having reviewed several of their products, though, I can tell you while their designs are not radically different from anything you have already seen, their form follows function and the quality of the materials and features and benefits are first-rate, despite the incredible value. The company recently impressed me with its StormBox Micro and XSound Go Bluetooth speakers, as well as the FlyBuds 1 wireless earbuds, and I was impressed with the sound quality, features, and build quality. So I’ll admit my biases right up front: I went into this review of Tribit’s QuietPlus 78, a full-sizes over-ear Bluetooth ANC headphones with higher expectations than one should probably have for a $79.99 pair of cans. 

What does the Tribit QuietPlus 78 deliver for 79 bucks?

The first thing you notice about the QuietPlus 78 is that it’s quite comfortable for a full-sized, over-ear, closed-back wireless headphone. It may not be the lightest design you can get your hands on, but it’s nonetheless comfortable, with high-quality materials and just the right amount of caliper pressure. It features a fold-up design and comes with a very nice hard-shell carry case. The only finish option is black with a slim silver ring around each earcup, but it’s a classic, understated aesthetic. 

Buttons are well-placed and feel solid. Once you get the hang of which button to press and how many times to press it for each function, you won’t have any trouble remembering how to select between the three ANC modes (Low, High, Ambient, and Off), volume up and down, next and previous track, play and pause, answer and end call, redial last called number, activate Siri, and enter and clear Bluetooth pairing. 

There are some frustrations with the controls. To access Siri, you must press the multi-function button twice. I much prefer hands-free activation of digital assistants, which is the sort of thing you normally only get on higher-priced headphones. But it doesn’t take that long to acclimate to the double-press.

It also doesn’t take long to get used to toggling between the different active noise cancellation modes. Surprisingly, I found myself enjoying the ANC Low settings, as there are times when I just need a bit of noise attenuation, and that’s exactly what this mode provides. ANC High, on the other hand, is perfect for travel or for particularly noisy environments. The pass-through or Ambient mode is like Transparency mode on the AirPods Pro, just without the perfect level of balance you get with Apple’s pricey in-ears. Still, it works well considering the price. All things considered, the ANC on these wallet-friendly headphones is very good. 

What can you expect in terms of connectivity and battery life? 

The QuietPlus 78 employs Bluetooth 5.0, so it was no surprise to discover that, despite the price tag, this headphone benefits from a stable connection, excellent range, low latency (there was no noticeable lip sync issues when watching YouTube or other streaming videos or during gaming), and excellent battery life. Furthermore, the QuietPlus 78 can simultaneously connect to two devices and will switch to whichever device becomes active. For example, if you pair to both your smartphone and computer or if you are listening to music from your computer and you get an incoming call, the QuietPlus 78 will automatically switch to your smartphone for the duration of the call. 

Battery life is listed as 30 to 35 hours on a single full charge, which takes roughly three hours. “Turbo-Charge” allows you to gain four hours of playtime from a quick ten minutes of juice. The package comes with a USB-A to USB-C cable. No wall converter is included, but any USB power adapter can be used. Also included is a 3.5mm audio cable that allows you to switch over to wired operation for uninterrupted listening on those long flights or if you simply forget to charge the headphone.

How does the Tribit QuietPlus 78 sound?

Should you expect audiophile-level performance out of Tribit’s flagship wireless headphone? No, but then that isn’t its intended purpose. If we can agree its purpose is delivering clear and intelligible phone calls and solid music, movie, and gaming experiences, The QuietPlus 78 is more than up to the task. 

Low frequencies pack plenty of punch,the mids are never muddy, and highs never get shrill. They create a nice left-right soundstage but lack the spacious, immersive imaging you expect from flagship Sony, Apple, and Bose wireless ANC headphones. It really comes down to how much performance you’re willing to pay for, and the Tribit QuietPlus 78, while far from perfect, delivers far more listening enjoyment than you would expect, given its price.   

High Points:

  • The QuietPlus 78 offers solid sonic performance with great features, including surprisingly good active noise cancellation, long battery life, and Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity with multipoint.
  • The ear cups and headband are comfortable, and materials better than expected. 
  • The included hard-shell carry case and fold-up design are the sort of niceties that you would normally have to pay more for.

Low Points:

  • There is no attendant app for EQ adjustments or presets for music, movie, gaming, or spoken word.
  • The QuietPlus 78 doens’t have an auto-off feature.
  • There is no hands-free access to your smartphone’s digital assistant. Access is via double button-presses only.  

How does the Tribit QuietPlus 78 compare to the competition?

The Tribit QuietPlus 78 is priced competitively against the Anker Soundcore Life Q30 ($79.99) and sells for just a bit less than the Audio-Technica ATH-ANC500BT ($79.99) and JBL Tune 750BTNC ($99.95).  

The Soundcore Life Q30 has an attendant app that brings a great suite of sound customization. The Audio-Technica model has very good active noise cancellation, but less battery life at 20 hours compared to 30 or 35 for the QuietPlus 78. JBL’s offering here has the least battery life at 15 hours of operation between charges, but does allow hands-free voice control of digital assistants including Alexa, Google, Siri, and Bixby.  

Final thoughts

Amongst these affordable, feature-rich, full-sized Bluetooth headphones with ANC, you really can’t make a bad decision. It will come down to what’s most important to you. None lack in sound quality. though the associated app for the Soundcore Q30 allows you to tweak the sound to your preference. They all integrate with your Bluetooth devices, though I give the nod here to JBL for their enhanced hands-free voice control of all major digital assistants. All offer acceptable clarity for making and taking phone calls. Deep bass and fold-up design are where the QuietPlus 78 sets itself apart, so if these are important factors for your wireless noise cancelling headphone needs, the Tribit QuietPlus 78 is a wonderful choice.

Review: Magico ASUB Subwoofer

I recently had the pleasure of reviewing Magico’s A3, the company’s “entry level” tower, as well as the ACC center channel from the A Series. The presence of the latter points toward Magico’s surround sound intentions with this line, so it’s no real surprise that the company also offers a companion subwoofer, the ASUB ($7,200). The ASUB’s construction is similar to that of the other A Series speakers: A sealed enclosure comprised of black, brushed 6061 T6 aluminum panels. While the 1/2-to 3/4-inch thick aluminum panels would be sufficiently rigid for most manufacturers, Magico adds extensive internal bracing to further reduce cabinet vibrations. The result is a relatively compact unit measuring 18 inches high, 17.6 inches deep, and 14.5 inches wide, with a weight significantly more than its size would indicate: 108 pounds. 

Frequency response is reported as 20 to 120Hz, but no reference points are provided other than it “is capable of reproducing 50Hz at 110dB with minimal distortion.” Our own measurements confirm this is accurate.

The front-firing, ten-inch aluminum cone driver is on display above the Magico name plate, as is the sub ships with no grille (although you can purchase one separately for $300). The rear panel features an IEC power cord port and power switch at the bottom of the amplifier panel, with a pair of single-ended inputs (left and right), one balanced input, one balanced output, a USB port, and four small LEDs next to a tiny black push button toward the top. The simple rear panel belies the highly advance capabilities within. As with the A3 and ACC, the ASUB also includes exquisitely machined spikes to provide a stable coupling to the floor. If you have hardwood floors, you can either use the included protective floor saver discs under the spikes, or the machined rounded bottom footers supplied as an alternate to the spikes. 

The folks at Magico take a lot of pride in designing the components in their speakers, but provide little information about the ASUB’s driver other than to say what you would expect to hear from a state-of-the-art speaker manufacturer about the considerations taken in its design.  The available information describes the 10-inch aluminum cone and 55-millimeter titanium voice coil, but there are few other details. 

Unlike any other Magico speaker I have reviewed, the ASUB came with a thumb drive and USB cable. This was a hint at some of the Magico ASUB’s hidden prowess. The exquisitely built and finished cabinet and advanced driver technology would be notable if this were not a Magico product. However, as I have been fortunate to spend time with other Magico speakers, this is exactly what I expected from the ASUB. What I did not expect, and what surprised me, was the amount of advanced technology Magico incorporated. 

The Magico Sub Control program allows an incredible amount of control of the 500-Watt digital amplifier. The program allows for the typical programming of gain, phase, delay crossover level and slope, but that only scratches the surface. The program provides a plethora of filter and equalization options that provides an incredible amount of detailed tuning options to obtain a smooth integration with you main speakers. It can take some patience and perseverance to get it all dialed in, but the results are worth it. The initial software setup took me under an hour, including breaks to do some firmware updates. Up to three profiles can be saved in the ASUB and selected by pressing a small button on the back of the subwoofer.  

I listened to the ASUB along with a pair of Magico A3s for stereo sources and added the Magico ACC for multi-channel sources. The A3s were run full range for both. Magico also included Wireworld Eclipse 8 interconnects for the purposes of this review, but that’s not a standard pack-in.

“I Bid You Goodnight” by Aaron Neville, from his album Warm Your Heart (Tidal, A&M), has a simple but well-recorded kick drum that the ASUB reproduced with realistic detail and weight. The notes from the kick drum are repeated throughout the track, with the listener being able to discern the initial strike, main impulse, and short decay. 

YouTube Video

“Deeper” by Peter Belasco (Tidal, Nashville Catalog) lacks the acoustic drums but features a multi-layered bassline that both reaches deep and tests the ASUB’s integration. The synthesized bass lines transition in frequency from low to high and vice-versa, so I figured that this would reveal any problems in the integration between the ASUB and A3s, but the transitions were smooth in both amplitude and timbre. This was particularly impressive in light of how well articulated the A3’s bass reproduction is.

YouTube Video

One of the movies I watched with the ASUB in place is one I also used in my ACC review: 1917 (UHD, Universal). This World War I film has plenty of bomb blasts, the depths of which the ASUB was able to reproduce with visceral impact and no signs of stress or distortion at reasonable listening levels. 

YouTube Video

My CEA2010 measurements were performed at 2 meters (add 6dB to compare to 1M measurements).

Frequency SPL
80Hz 106.1 dB
63Hz 108.9 dB
50Hz 109.7 dB
40Hz 107.8 dB
31.5Hz 102.8 dB
25Hz 96.8 dB
20Hz 91.3 dB

High Points

  • The flexibility and control afforded by the Magico Sub Control allows for a smooth integration with a variety of speakers.
  • The ASUB’s transients were incredibly fast on both the leading and trailing edges, with absolutely zero bloat or overhang, rendering the bass notes with exceptional clarity. 
  • Magico once again delivers simply excellent sound and build quality. 

Low Points

  • The lack of remote control capabilities (other than by a USB tethered computer), coupled with a small preset button on the back panel, can make switching between presets more difficult than it has to be.
  • The lack of left and right balanced inputs to go along with the left and right line-level inputs is curious. 
  • I cannot help but wonder if the amplifier in the ASUB is the limiting factor in the subwoofer’s output capabilities.

How does the Magic ASUB compare to the competition?

JL Audio’s Fathom f110v2 ($3,500) has a similar configuration to the Magico ASUB, in that it is a compact, sealed subwoofer with a 10-inch driver. The Fathom’s cabinet is made from MDF and not thick aluminum panels, but it includes JL Audio’s D.A.R.O. (Digital Automatic Room Optimization) system, which is said to achieve good results. 

Sonus Faber’s Gravis III ($2,995) is also a sealed subwoofer with a 10-inch driver. Like the Fathom, it also has an automatic room calibration system. Sonus Faber offers the Gravis in luxury finish options including leather and wood.  

Final thoughts

In short, the Magico ASUB provides excellent sound quality with enough flexibility to blend it with any system I can think of. The tradeoff – and there is always a tradeoff – is limited output below 30Hz. Magico recommends dual subwoofers, which would provide additional headroom, but if you have a large room or play a lot of pipe organ music at reference volume, one (or a pair) of Magico’s larger subwoofers may be a better option. 

The amount of granular control options afforded by the Magico Sub Control system allowed me to obtain the most seamless subwoofer integration I have experienced in my home, though. The program’s numerous options can be daunting, but I suspect most buyers will fall into one of two groups. The first group will simply have their dealer configure everything and the second group will be the audio enthusiasts that will break out their measurement microphones and tweak settings for the pure enjoyment of it. 

While I expect many readers to note that there are variety of less expensive, high-quality subwoofers on the market, I have yet to hear another 10-inch model that could beat the overall performance of the ASUB.

Apos TOPPING-30 Ensemble DAC and Headphone Amp Review

As I said in my review of the Sony WH-1000XM4 wireless headphone, my listening habits are changing. That wireless headphone was the impetus I needed to finally break free from wires when listening on the go via my iPhone. But if I’m kicking back for some serious music therapy at home and my wife is asleep or working, or I simply need to fully shut out the rest of the world, there’s just no replacement—for me, at least—for a good open-backed set of cans and a dedicated headphone amp. Something like the Topping L30 and its accompanying digital-to-analog converter, the E30.

Sure, many of the electronics I own have headphone jacks. Some of them, like the one built into my beloved Peachtree Audio integrated amp, are actually pretty great. But the fact of the matter is that I don’t really feel like firing up my two-channel listening system just to plug in a set of headphones. Eleven times out of ten, when I strap on a personal listening device, I’m not going to load up a CD or SACD or DVD-A. Instead, I’m going straight to Qobuz or Spotify to load up a playlist or radio station so I can close my eyes and get lost in the music without having to fiddle with input selection or even track selection. 

I’m not claiming that’s representative of how most audio enthusiasts use their headphones at home. In fact, I’m sure that anecdote is downright infuriating to most audiophiles. But the beauty of our hobby is that there’s an appropriate product for everyone’s tastes, everyone’s needs, everyone’s habits. And just speaking purely for myself here, something like the Topping L30 and E30 combo offers the perfect mix of convenience, performance, and ergonomics. 

The duo, by the way, comes to us on loan from Apos, a US-based online retailer dedicated to curating headphone and headphone-related products, offering helpful buying advice, and assembling what it refers to as “Ensembles”—premade DAC/HPA systems that are also accompanied by headphone recommendations.

The Apos TOPPING-30 Ensemble includes the E30 and the L30 together with a Fanmusic C003 stereo RCA interconnect, and at $300.99 the package represents a reasonable savings over purchasing the components separately. Individually, the E30 and L30 sell for $149.99 each and the Fanmusic C003 runs $35.99. So, by buying the ensemble, you’re effectively getting the interconnect for a buck and a penny. Or you could look at it as a 10.4-percent discount on the whole kit and caboodle. Either way, it’s a great deal, and Apos has a price-match guarantee on the off-chance you find the Topping gear and Fanmusic interconnect cheaper somewhere else.

The Topping E30 is built on AKM’s AK4493EQ two-channel DAC chip and features USB-B, coaxial, and optical digital inputs. The USB input supports DSD 64-512, and PCM at sampling rates up to 768kHz and word lengths up to 32-bit, whereas the coax and optical inputs max out DoP (DSD over PCM) up to quad rate and 192kHz PCM. 

The L30 employs what Topping refers to as a NFCA (Nested Feedback Composite Amplifier) design for compatibility with low-impedance headphones (down to an insane 8 ohms, allegedly), but its three-way gain selection switch means that it’s perfectly suited for use with practically any headphone, from the most power-hungry cans to the most sensitive in-ear monitors. It features stereo RCA inputs as well as outputs, meaning it can function as a preamp or a headphone amp that delivers 3,500mW per channel into 16 ohms; 2,300mW per channel into 32 ohms; and 280mW per channel into 300 ohms, all with rated THD+N of less than 0.1 percent.

Setting up the Apos TOPPING-30 Ensemble

The simplicity to which I referred above extends not only to operation, but also to setup. The E30 and L30 don’t feature a ton of inputs, so there’s really not much to worry about in that respect. The only real aggravation in terms of physical configuration is the fact that the soft plastic caps covering the RCA connections require roughly as much force and finesse to remove as do a hippo’s wisdom teeth. I ended up having to use pliers.

Other than that, everything is as straightforward as could be, although I did have to tinker around with setup just a bit to achieve optimal performance. The E30 DAC can be powered by its USB connection, so my first inclination was simply to plug it into the USB output of my Maingear media PC and route the RCA outputs to the inputs of the L30. A bit of listening, though, convinced me that I needed to opt for a cleaner power source. 

Thankfully, the DAC also sports a 5v DC input, but the power cord it comes with terminates in a USB-A connection, so I had to borrow a USB power adapter from my iPhone. With that plugged into my SurgeX surge eliminator and power conditioner, the audio cleaned up quite nicely. The difference wasn’t substantial, mind you, but enough to be noticeable when listening via my Westone custom IEMs.

The E30 doesn’t have much by way of controls. A simple multi-function button on the front allows you to wake the DAC from standby and switch it between DAC and Preamp modes. If you opt for the latter, you’ll need to use the included remote for volume control. But I left it in DAC mode since I intended to use it only with the L30. You’ll also need the remote if you want to tweak the PCM and DSD filters, or to select between three display-brightness presets. 

The L30 features just a few more controls, but not many. The front face features a pair of Schiit-like dipswitches that control power and mode (Off/HPA/Preamp) and gain (-9dB/0dB/+9dB), along with a nice rotary volume control. Between those sits the quarter-inch headphone jack, and that’s it. 

Unlike the E30, the L30 comes with an AC adapter brick, and it’s worth noting that it weighs approximately as much as one of its masonry namesakes. It’s also worth noting that it’s of the wall-wart variety, with the prongs built into the brick itself, something to consider if you’re using a power strip or UPS whose receptacles are rotated 90 degrees from the norm.

At any rate, with just a bit of rearranging of power cords to give the L30’s brick the coveted end spot, I had the entire system out of the box and up and running within five minutes. As I said above, my only source was my Maingear PC, and almost all of my listening was done via Spotify (using DirectSound) and Qobuz (in WASAPI exclusive mode). I did experiment a little with different headphones just to test the stack’s capabilities, but the vast majority of my critical listening was done via my Audeze LCD-2 open-back cans—one of Apos’ headphone recommendations for this system.

How does the Apos TOPPING-30 Ensemble sound?

I started my listening, as I almost always do with any headphone-related product, with Allman Brother’s Band’s “Blue Sky” via Qobuz, not because of its audiophile bona fides, but because of my familiarity with it. Dicker with the tonal balance even slightly or introduce any appreciable amount of coloration, and I’m going to hear it with this track way before I would pick up on it while listening to Snooty McSnooterbritches’ Concerto for Bagpipes and Kazoo in C half-sharp minor, Op. Whatever

What I heard coming out of the Topping stack was… well, it was “Blue Sky,” exactly as it exists in my brain, with all of the little squawks caused by fingers sliding across nickel strings, all of the saturated valve-amp harmonics, all of the little nuanced textured created by Butch and Jaimoe’s syncopated drumming—all of those little details that I know are there to be extracted by a good DAC were presented and accounted for, flowing from the stack effortlessly. 

YouTube Video

Next up I took Steely Dan’s “My Old School” for a spin, mostly to test the stack’s imaging and stereo separation. There really isn’t much to say in that department. I didn’t hear the slightest cause for concern. What struck me, though, is just how dynamic the Topping gear is, especially for this price and when paired with this headphone. Transient response was also excellent, and I was particularly impressed by the attack of the horns and percussion. For such an itty-bitty stack, this duo packs a hell of a punch. 

YouTube Video

That same capacity for dynamic punch also revealed itself with “The Throne Room and End Title” from John Williams’ recently remastered score for Star Wars: A New Hope. Soundstaging and imaging were also excellent, but what I found myself focusing on most was the perfectly rendered textures and timbres of the horns and strings. There’s a tactile quality to the output of the Topping stack that just draws me in. There’s no editorializing here, no accentuation of this, that, or the other aspect of the music. But the low noise floor, excellent detail, and perfect tonal balance combine to create an experience that constantly reminds you you’re listening to real instruments recorded in real rooms. 

YouTube Video

Lastly, I played back some tri-tone warbles (at 96kHz and 192 kHz) to test for intermodulation distortion. I found that most of the PCM filters did a good job of minimizing IMD, and what little remained was quiet enough to be masked by any music played at the same volume. So take heart, high-resolution audio enthusiasts: The Topping gear earns its Hi-Res Audio certification handily. 

The downside

There’s really only one thing I don’t like about the Topping E30/L30 combo, and that’s the fact that the E30’s remote won’t control the volume of the L30. There’s a way to use the remote for volume control, but it means putting the E30 into preamp mode instead of DAC mode, which would not be my preference. 

I also find it ever-so-slightly annoying that the remote has buttons that serve no function. It’s understandable as a cost-savings measure, as this remote is used across the Topping DAC line, all the way up to the much pricier D90, but it’s still a bit frustrating to look at the remote and think, “Wait, what does that button do again? Oh yeah, nothing.” 

How Does the Apos TOPPING-30 Ensemble compare to the competition?

Of the headphone setups that I have any appreciable experience with, the Topping gear probably compares most closely to Schiit’s offerings. The L30 headphone amp sits right between the Schiit Magnius at $199 and the Magni at $99 and strikes a nice overall balance between their specs and capabilities. Or you could opt for something like the Vali at $149 if you’re looking to add tube amplification to your headphone setup.

The E30, by contrast, is more comparable to the Modius DAC ($199) in its capabilities (and its DAC chip), although the Schiit piece does add AES inputs and balanced XLR outputs. 

Final thoughts

I could be wrong about this, but I think a barrier to entry into the dedicated headphone setup arena for a lot people is either price or hassle, which is what makes the Apos TOPPING-30 Ensemble such a compelling little setup. It delivers serious performance for a fraction of the price of many DAC/HPA combos, and its simple setup and operation make a pleasure to use. You don’t get niceties that come with a much higher price, like balanced outputs, but it’s up to you to decide how essential such upgrades are. 

For me, this stack sits right in the sweet spot I’m looking to hit. It offers a substantial upgrade over the headphone outputs built into most of my gear and it’ll actually drive the fussiest cans in my collection. For $300, it’s pretty much a no-brainer.

Additional Resources
• Find more about Apos products at the Apos website.
• If you want more in-depth coverage of Headphone amps be sure to check out more reviews on Home Theater Review.

Focal Chora 826-D, Center & 806 Surround Sound Speaker System Review

Focal (rhymes with “So Cal”) is a world-famous French manufacturer of loudspeakers, headphones, and individual loudspeaker drive units used in a number of high-end audio, architectural, and automotive applications. The firm is perhaps best known for its spectacular (and breathtakingly expensive) Grande Utopia EM Evo loudspeaker system ($260,000/pair) and for its world-class Utopia headphones ($4,400, reviewed here). Happily, though, design DNA from such unobtanium-class products does trickle down into much more affordable Focal products, such as the Chora series surround-sound speaker system reviewed here. 

The system comprises a pair of Chora 826-D ($1,395 apiece), a Chora Center ($790), two Chora 806 ($990/pair) with a Chora 806 stand ($290/pair), and a Sub 1000F ($1,990), although you will save a little when buying the complete package from a dealer.

Focal sometimes seems like a materials sciences company that just happens to specialize in designing world-class loudspeaker drive units. In this respect, Focal parallels other engineering-led firms such as Bowers & Wilkins or KEF. In practical terms, this means most ranges of Focal loudspeakers – including the Chora-series models – feature distinctive construction materials whose physical properties are directly linked to speaker performance.

All Chora models use distinctive, wave guide-mounted, inverted TNF Aluminum/Magnesium dome tweeters. The “special sauce” aspect of this alloy is that the Aluminum component adds lightness and stiffness, while the Magnesium component (also very light) adds internal damping to inhibit unwanted ringing and other potentially edgy-sounding distortions. 

Chora-series tweeters also feature surrounds (or suspension rings) made of Poron – a material that has the property of shape memory and is said to “reduce distortion in the 2-3kHz range, where the human ear has very great sensitivity.” 

Finally, the tweeter waveguides, which appear circular when viewed from the front, are actually shallow oblong directivity-control horns; the “horns” are wider than they are tall in order to achieve broader and more precisely controlled dispersion in the horizontal axis. Focal says that, in the horizontal plane, Chora’s tweeter/waveguide assembly delivers “frequency response (that) has a variance of +/- 0.5dB,” which is said to assure, “an incredibly stable sound stage which makes the listening position less critical.”

The Chora speakers also feature mid-bass and (in some models) dedicated bass drive units that use composite Slatefiber diaphragmsSlatefiber is a material that consists of recycled, non-woven, oriented carbon fiber encapsulated within a thermoplastic polymer.

Focal claims that this composite offers four desirable acoustic benefits: namely, diaphragms that are light, rigid, internally self-damped, and that offer proper wave propagation in terms of sound velocity. To place these comments in context, it helps to know that Focal has a long history of creating innovative, high-tech driver diaphragm materials, so that Slatefiber takes its place alongside the firm’s other signature composites such as Flax and W-series materials.

For me, this review is particularly significant in that it marks my return to a full-on surround sound system for the first time in several years. It is also the first Dolby Atmos-capable speaker system I have had the opportunity to try. 

Setting up Focal Chora surround sound system

For my listening and movie-watching tests I used a 58-inch Samsung plasma TV that was hand-calibrated by the manufacturer, a Marantz NR-1711 slim-line AV receiver, a Spectrum cable TV box, a Sony PlayStation 4 game system and Blu-ray player, and cable loom consisting entirely of WireWorld components. I enjoyed a variety of streamed movies and music programs via Spectrum, a collection of Dolby Atmos Blu-ray movie discs, and high-resolution Blu-ray music material. 

The Chora 826-D main speakers are slender, three-way, four-driver bass reflex floorstanders whose primary driver array consists of one 1-inch wave guide-loaded TNF Aluminum/Magnesium inverted dome tweeter, one 6.5-inch Slatefiber mid-bass driver, and two 6.5-inch Slatefiber woofers. The up-firing Dolby Atmos module of the 826-D features a separate sealed chamber in the top of the speaker with an upwardly angled 5.125-inch quasi full-range Atmos driver. The 826-D sports two sets of speaker binding posts: one for the main, forward-firing driver array, and the other for the upward firing Atmos driver. Interestingly, the nominal load impedance of the main speaker is 8 Ohms, whereas the impedance of the Atmos driver is 6 Ohms.

The Chora 826-D, as with the original Chora 826 (reviewed here), features clean, crisp, rectangular lines with an attractive wood-grain vinyl wrap (offered in light wood, dark wood, and black finishes) on the top, bottom, sides, and rear panel of the cabinets. The front baffle of the 826-D (and all Chora models) is treated to a matte-textured blue/grey coating on the dark wood offering, cream on the light wood, and gloss black for the black finish, with magnetically attached fabric grilles that cover the Slatefiber drivers (Focal recommends leaving these grilles off for maximum acoustic transparency). The TNF Al/Mg tweeter features a built-in metal mesh protective screen, while the tweeter waveguide is molded in a thermoplastic material that matches the color of the baffle. A flared, forward-firing bass-reflex port flange completes the picture. Up top, an oblong magnetically attached fabric grille protects the upward firing Dolby Atmos driver.

One striking design touch is a wedge-shaped, bolt-on plinth that comes with the 826-D and that serves to tilt the entire loudspeaker backward by a few degrees. Since most of us are used to seeing rectangular objects stand straight up and down (perpendicular to the floor), the 826-Ds create a vivid impression as they lean backward (almost as if falling over to the rear).

The Chora Center is a sealed, acoustic suspension-type speaker designed to be oriented horizontally. It features two 6.5-inch Slatefiber mid-bass drivers flanking a centrally positioned 1-inch TNF Aluminum/Magnesium tweeter. The cabinet’s industrial design matches that of the 826-D and features a press-on riser bar that attaches to the bottom of the cabinet and that tips the speaker backward at an angle roughly matching the rearward tilt of the 826-D.

The Chora 806 is mid-sized, bass reflex stand-mount monitor that uses one 1-inch TNF Aluminum/Magnesium tweeter, one 6.5-inch Slatefiber mid-bass driver, and incorporates a forward firing bass reflex port. While the speakers could be placed on a bookshelf or third-party stand, I would recommend using them with Focal’s optional stands. The stands feature a wedge-shaped floor pedestal (similar in appearance to the wedge-shaped plinth that goes under the 826-D), a vertical riser strut, and a top-plate with pre-drilled holes through which the user inserts beefy mounting bolts (included) that sink into matching tapped holes in the bottom of the speakers. The key is that the wedge-shaped floor pedestal tips the stand, and thus the speakers, backward at an angle roughly corresponding to the tilt of the main and center speakers.

The Sub 1000 F is a powered subwoofer that comes from a higher range of Focal speaker than the Chora range (the Sub 1000 F roughly corresponds to Focal’s upscale Aria 900 loudspeaker family). 

It is a sealed, acoustic suspension-type subwoofer sporting a 12-inch woofer with a diaphragm made of Focal’s proprietary Flax composite material. Focal claims the material is “light, stiff, and well damped,” with the result that it is said to deliver, “greater neutrality of timbre and better sound definition.”

The Sub 1000 F incorporates a stout and very high-powered 1000-watt BASH amplifier. The cabinet is roughly cube-shaped and finished in matte black, but with a very beefy 1.5625-inch thick front baffle finished in gloss black. A circular grille covered in black cloth covers the woofer for day-to-day operations.

Focal says the Chora system requires a break-in period of roughly 20 hours of continuous play before the drive units stabilize and deliver full performance. I would concur with this recommendation, but I would add that even more break-in time can be beneficial because it helps the sound of the system to smooth out even more and to “open up” considerably. Straight out of the box I found the system sounded a little stiff or overly constrained and perhaps ever-so-slightly prone to edginess. However, if you give the system the time it needs to loosen up and smooth out rough edges, very good sonic things can and do happen.

How does the Chora surround system perform?

In general, the Chora system offers neutral voicing (long a Focal hallmark) and a lively, energetic sound that makes dynamic contrasts in music, movies, and television broadcasts easy to hear and appreciate. Neutrality is simply part of Focal’s design DNA, but the system’s dynamic properties are due, I think, to the fact that the Chora models are reasonably sensitive and easy to drive, so that one doesn’t really need Battlestar Galactica-grade AV electronics to make the speakers sing. On the contrary, once broken in the Chora system delivered consistently expressive sound with ample measures of detail and resolution, while remaining pleasingly unfussy in everyday use.

I really cannot overstate the importance of the contributions made by the Sub 1000 F to the overall sound of the system. The sub is surprisingly powerful, with plenty of dynamic headroom, offers exemplary low frequency extension, very good transient speeds, and very fine bass pitch definition. Put all of these qualities together and you have a sub that in every way builds upon and in fact expands upon the core strengths of the main Chora system. Many subwoofer debates devolve into heated discussions of depth (or extension), output (how loud will it play), bass quality (transient speed, pitch definition, and accurate rendering of textural and transient details), and impact (a quality some aficionados call “slam”). Focal’s Sub 1000 F comes home a winner because it does all of the above well and in a really balanced way – in the process giving the Chora system the elusive yet very desirable qualities of low-end muscle, swagger, and “jump,” coupled with a solid measure of finesse.

The sonic qualities of the Chora system and Sub 1000 F coalesce to make surround sound in general and Dolby Atmos soundtracks in particular a joy to hear. Honestly (and perhaps shamefully) I had forgotten how enjoyable a well dialed-in multichannel system could be, but the Chora/Sub 1000 F brought it all back to me in a vivid and compelling way.

Near the opening of First Man, test pilot and astronaut-to-be Neil Armstrong is piloting the difficult-to-fly X-15 rocket plane on a mission that carries the craft up to and beyond the outer edges of the atmosphere. Armstrong encounters a terrifying moment when, upon his first attempt at re-entry, the X-15 inadvertently skips off the surface of the atmosphere, taking a heart-stopping, unplanned detour back upward toward the edges of space.  In that extended scene, the soundtrack takes a lead role, first by showing the incredible power of the X-15’s rocket engine, which is conveyed by the almost deafening, all-enveloping, low-pitched roar of the engine. Next, the extreme dangers involved in guiding the experimental craft up beyond the edges of the atmosphere are expressed by the sudden, almost eerie silence that ensues when the rocket engine is cut off and the X-15 follows a curved ballistic path thousands of feet above the atmosphere. Then, the uncertainties and dangers of (attempted) re-entry are captured by wild sounds of buffeting as the craft’s outer skin becomes visibly red-hot. 

Fast-forward to Armstrong’s eventual, successfully re-entry, and he has a wild ride as he struggles to right the craft in the dense air, then to maneuver the rocket plane over mountainous terrain, and finally to bring it safely to a rest on its landing skids in the midst of a dry lake bed. Thanks to the power of the soundtrack, and once the cacophony of the landing ends, I was aware that I had involuntarily been holding my breath for perhaps the last 30 seconds or so of the X-15’s perilous descent. Such is the emotional impact that Dolby Atmos and an accomplished surround speaker system can bring to the movie-watching experience.

YouTube Video

The 2019 film Midway depicts the epic WWII battle of the same name, which is widely considered to be the turning point for America’s fortunes in the war in the Pacific. During the battle, American torpedo bombers proved largely ineffective, partly because their low/slow/on-the-deck attack approaches left them terribly vulnerable to anti-aircraft fire, but also because their torpedoes were relatively untested and notoriously unreliable. This meant that the crux of the battle depended upon the navy’s squadrons of Douglas SBD Dauntless dive-bombers. As a self-confessed airplane nut, I have often wondered what a dive-bomber attack might look like, sound like, or feel like, and Midway, with its brilliant Dolby Atmos soundtrack, provided answers.

The final dive-bombing attack scene is particularly effective thanks to the terrifying sound of the plummeting bomber descending to attack the sole remaining Japanese aircraft carrier, the deafening sound of anti-aircraft fire coming up from the ships below, and the heart-stopping sound of fire from Japanese fighter aircraft coming from behind and above the diving bombers. The soundtrack shows how the bomber pilots and their tail gunners must have had nerves of steel, ice water in their veins, and fierce, rock-solid commitment to their missions.  Otherwise, it seems, they would surely have been overcome by the sheer terror of the moment. Soundtracks like these, when reproduced as well as they are by the Focal Chora system, add a greatly heightened level of emotional content to the movie-watching experience.

YouTube Video

But, the Chora system is not just about movie watching; it’s an excellent performer for music listening as well. 

Throughout Dave Matthews & Tim Reynolds: Live at Radio City Music Hall (Blu-ray), I was struck by the deft, adroit way in which the Chora system captured the earthy passion and faint, signature rasp of Dave Matthew’s voice – qualities that, to my ears at least, define him as a performer nearly as much as his superb acoustic guitar work. Nowhere is this more evident than on the chorus of the beautiful Daniel Lanois tune “The Maker,” where one almost leans forward in anticipation of hearing Matthews’ phrasing as he renders the chorus line from which the song draws its title. Further, the Chora system does a brilliant job with Tim Reynold’s intricate, agile, and at time explosive acoustic guitar solo on “Betrayal,” which Reynolds wrote. The Chora speakers not only captured the fast-rising leading edges of rapid-fire notes, but also the fullness of the bodies of the notes, and finally their lingering decay. The articulacy and dynamic expressiveness of the Chora system was simply captivating.

YouTube Video

Watching Return to Forever Returns: Live at Montreux 2008 (Blu-ray) proved a poignant and bittersweet experience for me, as my listening sessions spanned the timeframe just before and then after the passing of the brilliant keyboardist Chick Corea. On one hand, I was so glad to have this Blu-ray record of Corea’s performance, but at the same time I was saddened to think there would be no more concert recordings forthcoming in the future. Still, this Blu-ray disc captures Return to Forever at the peak of its powers, as the Focal Chora system beautifully reveals.

In particular, the system invites the listener/viewer to focus intently on the interplay between these four master musicians, showing how they encourage, enable, support, and sometimes challenge one another as each song unfolds. I am particularly fond of the track “Vulcan Worlds” (composed by bassist Stanley Clarke), which shows the incredible speed and fluidity of Di Meola’s guitar work, the precision and power of White’s percussion contributions, the sheer genius of keyboardist (and musical master chef?) Corea as he both support and also instigates musical movement as the song develops, and finally the punchy yet sharply staccato sound of Clarke’s furious musical lines as played on his signature Alembic electric bass. Clarke’s bass lines show, especially, how powerful and seamlessly integrated the sounds of the Chora speakers and of Focal’s Sub 1000 F truly are. My point is that the Chora system does what a good music system should do: pull the listener deep inside the performance at hand.

The Downside

There really is no downside to the Focal Chora system when it is evaluated in its intended use context: namely, as a versatile speaker system suited both for home theater and music applications. Purists interested solely in music applications may find there are comparably priced stereo speaker systems that offer some performance advantages for music playback (advantages such as greater sonic transparency, heightened textural and transient detail, and superior top-to-bottom cohesiveness). Two music-focused alternatives would be the Martin Logan ElectroMotion ESL hybrid electrostatic dynamic floorstanding loudspeakers ($2500/pair) and the Magnepan 1.7i quasi-ribbon type dipolar floorstanding loudspeakers ($2400/pair). While both the Martin Logan and Magnepan speakers offer higher absolute performance limits for music listening, both speakers (and in particular the Magnepans) are far more demanding of electronics than the easy-to-drive Focal system.

How does the Focal Chora system compare to the competition? 

I can think of three systems that stand as direct competitors to the Focal Chora system and that I would encourage prospective buyers to audition.

The Bowers & Wilkins (B&W) 600-s Series system Anniversary System (reviewed here) is comprised of the 603 S2 Anniversary floorstanding speakers ($1999.99/pair), the HTM6 S2 Anniversary Edition center-channel speaker ($799.99), the 607 S2 Anniversary Edition stand mount monitors ($699.99/pair), and the  ($799.99). Stands for the 602 S2 monitors are sold separately.

The KEF Q Series system includes the  ($1999.98/pair), the  ($699.99/ea.), the  ($699/pair), and the  ($749.99/ea.). Customers desiring Dolby Atmos capabilities can purchase  designed for placement on top of the Q950 towers ($599.99/pair). These feature the company’s signature Uni-Q driver technology, where waveguide-loaded tweeters are positioned within the throats of mid-bass or bass drivers, creating multi-way driver assemblies where all drive units share the exact same acoustic centers – a design touch said to promote superior phase coherency and imaging.

The PSB Speakers Imagine X Series system includes the  ($2798/pair), the  ($449/each), the  ($549/pair), and the  ($1099). Customers desiring Dolby Atmos capabilities can purchase  designed for placement on top of the Imagine X2T towers ($799/pair). These rely on research methodologies first pioneered by the legendary acoustical consultant Floyd Toole, and expanded upon by PSB designer Paul Barton, to create speakers whose measured performance enjoys a high degree of correlation with musical accuracy as perceived by listeners. 

Of these three systems, I have the most experience with the PSB system and the least with the B&W system, with the KEF Q system somewhere in the middle. All three competitors have, as does Focal, solid reputations for being engineering led companies with a great deal of materials-science expertise when it comes to designing loudspeaker drive units. In England, both B&W and KEF helped pioneer measurement-driven development of advanced drive unit technologies, while in Canada PSB has famously used Canada’s NRC (National Research Council) Acoustics Laboratory to further its own loudspeaker designs. 

Final thoughts

I found Focal’s Chora/Sub 1000 F system helped me rediscover the joys (and cinematic significance) of high-quality surround sound systems. In fact, the Focal system was so good that it has inspired me to begin looking into acquiring a object-based surround system for my personal use.

The Focal Chora/Sub 1000 F system distinguished itself through a high degree of articulacy and uncommonly fine dynamic expression. Equally important is the fact that the system is easy to drive, meaning you won’t have to drop megabucks on AV electronics in order to hear what the Focal system has to offer. In fact, a good but modest AVR is all you need to bring the system alive.

Additional Resources
• Read our Focal Chora 826 Three-Way Floorstanding Loudspeaker Review.
• If you want more in-depth coverage of Focal products, read our Focal Chora 806 Bookshelf Speaker Review.

JBL 4349 2-way Studio Monitor Loudspeaker Review

About two years ago JBL introduced the L100 Classic (reviewed here), a modern version of the 1970 L100 speaker complete with Quadrex foam grille. Seeing the updated version of the speaker from the iconic Memorex ad was pretty cool, and apparently I’m not alone in feeling that way. The L100 was a hit, and JBL released more in its series of new speakers based on iconic designs but utilizing new technology. The JBL 4349 ($7,500) is a large stand-mounted monitor with an exposed horn that takes up the top third of the cabinet. It can be had in either a Black Walnut Wood veneer with a black grill or a Satin Walnut Wood Veneer with a blue grille. Go with the Satin Walnut Wood Veneer if you want to maximize the retro styling impact. 

Whichever finish works for you, it’s the large, black, molded composite horn that is likely to get your attention when you first see it. The horn is JBL’s new High-Definition Imaging (“HDI”) waveguide, which houses a new 1.5-inch dual-diaphragm compression driver. The bottom of the horn has a panel with high-frequency and ultra-high-frequency trim controls. The grille covering the bottom of the speaker hides a 12-inch woofer and a pair of front-firing ports. The cabinet measures 29 inches high, 17.5 inches wide, and 13.5 inches deep, and weighs in at a solid 83 pounds. The fit and finish of the veneer is nicely done, and the underlying MDF cabinet is solid and well braced. The specifications provided by JBL state the nominal impedance as 8 Ohms, with 91 dB efficiency. Frequency response is rated at 32Hz to 25kHz (±6dB).

Before I move on to discussing setup and listening, I wanted to discuss the D2415k compression driver. It’s based upon the D2430k used in the highly regarded M2 speaker system but uses dual drivers half the size as in the M2. The ring-shaped polymer drivers use a “V” shaped geometry said to reduce breakup modes. This new driver is paired with the HDI horn, which acts as a large waveguide to provide an optimized dispersion pattern. The Sonoglass composite material used for the HDI horn is dense and sonically inert.

Most of my listening was done with the 4349’s being powered by the Naim Uniti Atom. The 4349s need to be placed on a stand, so I paired them with the JS-120, a stand that works with several JBL speakers. The 4349s sit on the stands without any mechanical connection. 

Joss Stone’s “The Chokin Kind” from her album The Soul Sessions (Tidal, Virgin) sounded a little thinner in the midrange than they did via the recently reviewed B&W 603 S2s or any of the Performa Be models from JBL’s sister company, Revel. The overall impression is that of a recessed midrange and more forward treble. I tried different settings of the trim controls and found turning up the HF adjustment helped even the balance a bit. The 4349 clearly surpassed the other speakers in terms of efficiency and clarity in the upper midrange and above, though. Whether mated with the modest Naim or a larger Krell amplifier, the 4349s played extremely loudly and cleanly. There were no signs of stress or breakup.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/YOizvA0Oehc

Paula Coles’ “Tiger” from This Fire (Tidal, Warner) provided a workout for the 4349’s 12-inch woofer. I know that some may be skeptical of a simple paper woofer, but the 4349 is proof that JBL remains capable of designing very capable drivers with more common materials. In this case, the relatively high crossover point means the woofer has to cover a wide frequency range. I found the bass notes to be full and powerful but lacking some of the detailed nuance I found in the recently reviewed Revel F228Be and F328Be and Magico A3 speakers.

High Points

  • The JBL 4349 builds upon the iconic retro design of JBL studio monitors, which have been a mainstay in professional venues for decades.  
  • The combination of a 12-inch driver and a large, ported enclosure provides strong, full-bodied bass. 
  • The 4349 is extremely efficient and can play loudly with just a few watts of amplification. Thankfully the 4349 is capable of maintaining extremely low distortion levels at extremely high volumes, maintaining its composure well past the point many speakers would be falling apart sonically and perhaps even physically.

Low Points

  • There is a noticeable dip in the midrange. I was able to dial in better tonal balance using the tone controls, but never enough to completely get rid of the reticent midrange.
  • The JS-120 stand seems a bit anemic for the 4349. I can see how it would be a great fit for a smaller speaker, but the 4349 is a big boy. This may not be a concern for low-traffic areas, but if you are placing the speakers in moderate- to high-traffic areas, they should be on stable stands that mechanically connect to the speaker.

How does the JBL 4349 compare to the competition?

There are few stand-mounted speakers of this size that I can think of, so the likely competitors to the 4349 are other horn-based, retro-styled designs. Two come to mind right away: JBL’s own 4367 ($15,000) looks like an upsized 4349 but features a 15-inch woofer and the same compression driver utilized in the highly regarded M2. My limited listening experience with this speaker was very positive. 

Klipsch, another veteran horn-speaker manufacturer, also offers the Heritage Cornwall IV ($5,998),a three-way with a 15-inch woofer. 

Final thoughts

The JBL 4349 is a great mix of modern technology and old-school aesthetics. The combination of the all-new D2415k compression driver and new HDI waveguide provides incredibly dynamic highs, with fast transients and good imaging, while remaining extremely clean and free of distortion. While many “8 Ohm” speakers have significant impedance dips that make them harder to drive, the 4349 remained easy to drive cleanly and loudly. While I did not have any low-powered tube amplifiers to try out with the 4349s, I strongly suspect they would work just fine. The speakers never seemed to stress even modestly powered amplifiers, including a Russound MBX-Amp, which was able to drive the 4349 levels loud enough to make conversation impossible without yelling, despite putting out a meager 50 watts per channel. 

While I was not personally a fan of the midrange dip, some of my friends who had a chance to listen with me were fans of 4349’s voicing. The wide dispersion provided by the HDI horn provided a wide sweet spot for multiple listeners. We all agreed that the combination of seemingly effortless dynamics, detail, and lack of distortion of the upper midrange and treble were impressive. If you are a fan of the classic studio monitor style but want to take advantage of the recent developments in speaker technology, the JBL 4349s are worth taking a close listen to.

Additional Resources

Tribit XSound Go, StormBox Micro Portable Wireless Speakers Review

StormBox Micro
StormBox Micro

Tribit is a company you may not have heard of before, but the brand is starting to garner some attention for bringing lots of useful, needed audio products to market with features that put some of the big boys to shame. Its XSound Go ($32.99) and StormBox Micro ($49.99) portable wireless speakers are waterproof, offer Bluetooth connectivity and are extremely portable, easily fitting in the palm of your hand, or pocket, or backpack, or … well, you get the picture. 

XSound Go SpeakerWhat the speakers have in common is surprisingly good sound quality. They can get loud, though when pushed, they will distort and become increasingly unpleasant to listen to, but this is only after you’ve filled a medium-sized room or decent outdoor space (think at least a 25-foot circle). Really, one should not expect anything more from speakers this size. 

To be clear, I am impressed with what they do and how well they do it. I’ve read other reviews, though, that state these “go to eleven” without distorting, and I just can’t support that. At their loudest, speech losses clarity and you will likely be turning it down quickly. However, before they start to get into trouble, they are plenty loud and still sound wonderful. There is a nicely balanced tonality with plenty of low frequency punch and clarity in the high frequencies, while the middle remains detailed and precise. You won’t feel the bass, but you will certainly know it’s there. I don’t know of a better option for strapping to your bike or using as a simple desktop system that you can move from room to room or listen while on the go. 

How is the XSound Go different from the StormBox Micro? 

The XSound Go is a small, rounded-off cylinder, while the StormBox Micro is an even smaller, puck-shaped speaker. The XSound Go measures a little over 2 inches high and deep and 6.5 inches wide and weighs a little over a pound. 

The StormBox Micro is just under 4 inches wide and deep, and just over 1.5 inches high and weighs just over half a pound. 

The larger XSound Go has a bigger battery and offers 24 hours of continuous sound, while the smaller StormBox Micro has 8 hours of operation on tap. The XSound Go is also more powerful, with 12 watts coursing through two drivers. The StormBox Micro delivers 9 watts of output and achieves its impressive bass response thanks to what Tribit calls XBass Technology, which I suspect employs some passive radiator or port (or a combination of the two) to deliver deep low frequency response that belies its size. 

Both charge via USB-C and include USB-C charging cables, but only the StormBox Micro gives you visual battery level indication via a six segment LED display on the front. The XSound Go has an eighth-inch aux input for wired operation. The StormBox Micro can be used in pairs for stereo or party mode and employs the latest Bluetooth version 5.0, which has near zero latency, better battery performance, and greater range. 

Tribit XSound Go and carrying case

The XSound Go Bluetooth antenna is version 4.2, which may translate to audible delay, so if you plan to watch movies, TV, or play games using a portable wireless speaker, you may want to go with the StormBox Micro. 

While they are both waterproof, the Ingress Protection (IP) rating on the StormBox Micro includes defense against dust, sand, or other particulates (IP67) while the XSound Go (IPx7) might have some trouble with those. They should both handle water equally well, though. They both have built-in microphones for making and taking calls. The StormBox Micro also supports Multi-Point,which means you can connect to two sources via Bluetooth and play whichever one is active at the time, switching between the two automatically and nearly instantaneously. 

High Points:

  • Both the Tribit XSound Go and StormBox Micro deliver excellent sound performance, way better than their size or price would lead you to expect.
  • Both are waterproof hand have great battery life, in addition to their extremely portable.
  • Both of these Tribit speakers offer speakerphone capability via a built-in microphone.
Tribit XSound Go

Low Points:

  • The XSound’s Go rounded sides prevent vertical placement, which would be useful when desk space is at a premium.
  • The XSound Go employs Bluetooth 4.2, which can cause latency issues when gaming or watching video.
  • The StormBox Micro only offers 8 hours battery operation between charges.

How do the Tribit speakers compare to the competition?


A few alternatives that come to mind with similar feature sets are the JBL Flip 5 ($99.99), the Sony SRS-XB12 ($58) and the Anker Soundcore Boost ($59.99). They are all portable, waterproof Bluetooth speakers that sound quite good. The Anker and JBL models are cylindrically shaped like the XSound Go, while the Sony model looks more like the newly introduced Apple HomePod Mini

None have the form factor of the StormBox Micro, which, in addition to other applications, is really perfect for strapping to the handlebars of your bike. 

None sound bad and none stand out as significantly better than another, so it will come down to price and personal taste between these three competitors, and the two options from Tribit and the Tribit are the least expensive of the bunch. 

Final thoughts


It’s a great time to be a consumer, with the wealth of music streaming options available for a modest monthly subscription. But most of us spend our time listening to that music in isolation. If you’re in a party environment and want to share your tunes with your friends of family,  grabbing a portable Bluetooth speaker is a great option. Make it waterproof, give it a microphone to make and take calls, and throw in long battery life in a form factor that lets you toss the speaker in a backpack or carry it around from room to room. It would have seemed like science-fiction not that many years ago, but Tribit has done all of the above with the XSound Go and StormBox Micro, and offered them both at impulse-purchase pricing.

Additional Resources