Tag Archives: integrated

A severe “grip” on music… | Burmester 032 Integrated Amplifier Review

Tom Martin opinions the Burmester 032 Integrated Amplifier, detailing its envy-worthy craftsmanship, its relentless energy, and its plain “grip” on music…

The submit A severe “grip” on music… | Burmester 032 Integrated Amplifier Review appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Icon Audio Stereo 40 MkIV Signature Integrated Amplifier

Icon Audio’s David Shaw tells me that the Stereo 40, Icon’s very first amplifier introduction in 2001, was impressed by the Leak Point One amplifiers, in addition to numerous U.S. and Mullard designs. Being comparatively cheap and profitable sufficient, it gave Icon Audio the impetus to develop many different fashions. Yet, as David explains, the Stereo 40 all the time remained on the core of what the corporate does: Offer good worth for the cash and attempt to be higher than the competitors.

The Stereo 40 follows the tried-and-true method of an Ultralinear (UL) push-pull output stage with the output transformer tapped at 40%. Both KT88 and EL34 variations can be found, however the KT88 model seems to be extra fashionable. The amp is switchable to triode mode by way of a toggle swap on the entrance panel, although as a security precaution it’s endorsed that the amp be switched to standby mode earlier than doing so. A tape-monitor loop is included, as is a motorized quantity pot with a primary distant management. The 40 additionally includes a headphone enter that’s linked on to a low-power winding of the output transformer.

Much of the preliminary meeting is carried out in China, after which the amplifier is shipped to Leicester, England, and undergoes about 20 operations and mods earlier than being valved and examined. Critically, the output transformer is wound in-house. Every amp and preamp ever constructed by Icon Audio undergoes a listening take a look at previous to being shipped out, one thing David Shaw is sort of pleased with.

Under evaluate is the Signature model of the amp, which is upgraded in a number of important methods. It features a quartet of the Gold Lion KT88 Russian reissue tetrodes, a quartet of the David Shaw white-base CV181 twin triodes, and a complete of six Mundorf MCap EVO Silver/Gold in-oil coupling caps. Note that I haven’t auditioned the usual model, however actually, after residing with and having fun with the Signature version for a number of weeks, I believe that it considerably exceeds the sonic efficiency of the usual model.

A considerable design effort was geared toward reaching common attraction—that’s, making certain compatibility with as extensive a spread of loudspeakers and playback techniques as attainable. Both 4- and 8-ohm faucets are supplied, and the shopper is inspired to strive each within the context of his or her system. That’s as a result of a loudspeaker’s nominal ranking might be deceptive, as impedance magnitude variations with frequency of a couple of issue of 10 are frequent for many field audio system. Icon Audio’s buyer suggestions signifies that the majority do desire the 8-ohm faucets.

The triode/UL swap affords further flexibility in tuning a system. According to David, the design is centered round triode operation, and the diminished output of 25Wpc in triode mode must be sufficient for many home functions. His buyer suggestions signifies that most individuals run in triode mode on a regular basis, although a minority do desire UL. Ironically, as David places it, many purchasers wouldn’t purchase a 25W amplifier by itself.

There are, after all, sonic variations between the 2 modes of operation, however these attributes are very a lot affected by the selection of sensitivity setting by way of a back-panel toggle swap. In actuality, this can be a destructive suggestions (NFB) selector swap. The high-sensitivity setting equates to 6dB of NFB, whereas the low-sensitivity setting (122mV) equates to 12dB of suggestions. The center place provides zero NFB. Icon Audio’s buyer suggestions means that most individuals desire the low-NFB/high-sensitivity setting, and even no NFB. This is an intriguing discovering, as no NFB interprets to a poorer damping issue and objectively greater distortion ranges.

Experimenting with the NFB settings made for some instructive findings within the context of my very own system. My least favourite settings turned out to be low sensitivity (max NFB) in UL mode. While the bandwidth window expanded with enhanced treble readability and bass definition, picture focus and soundstage transparency suffered. The total presentation sounded a tad recessed and missing in immediacy. The swap to excessive sensitivity did enhance immediacy, however probably the most intense musical expertise was available within the no-NFB place. The spatial impression improved dramatically. Soundstage depth perspective blossomed, and picture focus turned way more stable. The draw back turned apparent, although, as bass traces loosened up a bit.

In triode mode, alternative of NFB setting was additionally apparent however a bit much less essential. Bass response was higher outlined relative to UL on the no-NFB setting. And with none suggestions the star attraction was a stunning, heat, and candy tonality and brown-sugar-flavored textures that compensated properly for dry recordings. In normal, no suggestions manifested itself in diminished treble extension, and a hotter much less detailed presentation. The highlight shifted to the decrease midrange the place the tonal gravitas of the CV181 shone by means of. Even the low-NFB setting was fairly able to delivering good sound with an outstanding boogie issue.

There was nonetheless one fly within the ointment. On wide-scale orchestral music, UL mode sounded way more dynamic with superior decrease midrange weight and bass definition. Even on a high-sensitivity speaker just like the Basszilla Platinum Edition, triode mode couldn’t generate as plausible an impression of orchestral energy. My favourite settings on this context ended up being UL mode/excessive sensitivity, the place I used to be reminded of the textural sweetness of EL84-based amp however with the lower-midrange authority that’s the hallmark of the 6SN7.

The tonal flexibility of the Stereo 40 turned evident but once more after I switched to the Fleetwood DeVille loudspeaker. With its livelier stability, it benefitted from the no-feedback setting, chopping down the perceived treble extension a bit and leading to a barely softer presentation, however with billowing picture outlines. However, there was extra to it than simply imaging. It resolved layers of orchestration exceptionally properly, and low-level element floated to the floor naturally with out the assistance of any gratuitous upper-midrange brightness. It was way more revealing than that nice and beloved traditional UL amplifier, the Dynaco ST-70, which virtually sounded fuzzy by comparability. One of the essential components I search for in any energy amp is a low annoyance issue. By annoyance I imply a shiny disposition, apparent textural grain, or lack of transient pace and rhythmic conviction. The Stereo 40 excelled when it got here to the music’s boogie issue, in addition to refined grain-free-textures and constancy to tonal colours. This was most evident on feminine voice, which was able to floating in house with emotional expressiveness. Brahms’ orchestral works outline beefy musical textures, and the Stereo 40 appeared to be the right accomplice, facilitating a most pleasant supply of the Double Concerto.

The Stereo 40 satisfies my urge for food for wonderful tube sound. Its confluence of musical attributes makes it sonically very enticing. In addition, it’s elegantly styled and simple to bias. I prefer it. I prefer it loads. In reality, I’ll go even additional and rank it among the many elite of built-in tube amps I’ve reviewed no matter worth.

Specs & Pricing

Power output: 55Wpc Ultralinear mode at clipping; 30Wpc triode mode at clipping
Frequency response: 20Hz–20kHz at 8 watts (medium suggestions, –0dB/–0.2dB; low suggestions, –0.25dB/–0.5dB; no suggestions, –2dB/–3dB
Input sensitivity: 122/280/825mV medium/low/zero suggestions
THD: 0.15% typical at 8Wpc (low suggestions)
S/N ratio: 85dB
Dimensions: 390 x 210 x 410mm
Weight: 22 kg
Price: $5295 (Signature); $4500 (Standard)

ICON AUDIO (UK) LTD
351 Aylestone Road
Leicester LE2 8TA UK
gross [email protected]
iconaudio.com

AUDIOARCAN (Authorized Distributor)
gross [email protected]
audioarcan.com

Associated Equipment
Speakers: Fleetwood Sound Company DeVille, Basszilla Platinum Edition MK II
Phono entrance finish: Kuzma Reference turntable, Kuzma Stogi Reference 313 VTA tonearm, Clearaudio daVinci V2 MC Phono Cartridge; Wright Sound WPP200C phono stage; Sound Tradition MC-10 step-up transformer
Digital entrance finish: MacBook Pro laptop computer operating Audirvana 3.5 software program; Qobuz streaming;  Denafrips IRIS USB digital-to-digital converter, Soekris dac1421 DAC
Cable & interconnects: Acrotec, Mogami & Kimber KCAG interconnects; Wireworld Music Ribbon, Acrotec 6N and Kimber KCAG speaker cable
Accessories: Sound Application CF-X & TT-7 energy line conditioners

The submit Icon Audio Stereo 40 MkIV Signature Integrated Amplifier appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Technics SU-G700M2 Integrated Amplifier Review | A Real Digital Amplifier?

With 70 watts/ch into 8 ohms and 140 watts/ch into 8 ohms the G700M2 is uncommon in its practically full digital strategy to amplification.

The put up Technics SU-G700M2 Integrated Amplifier Review | A Real Digital Amplifier? appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Western Electric 91E Integrated Amplifier and 300B Tube

I should confess that I’m biased towards tubes (pun intended). I’ve owned a number of tube-based amps, preamps, and phonostages. There is one thing that has all the time drawn me to their sound. Tubes appear to seize musicality in a means that their solid-state counterparts usually don’t fairly equal. My favourite amplification tube is the 300B. Though not with out limitations, it has an exquisite, lush sound that pulls me into the music. I’ve monoblock amplifiers for my reference system which can be based mostly on this tube. Those conversant in the 300B would most likely stereotype it as possessing a full, blooming midrange with an excessively well mannered prime finish and an absence of management and dynamics within the backside finish. I must agree that’s a attribute description; nevertheless, should you’ve ever wished the advantages of the 300B with out its shortcomings, learn on.

When Robert Harley initially requested me if I wish to overview the 91E, I needed to decline, as a result of the 91E was simply too good an built-in amplifier to adequately overview in what was then my second system, and there was no sensible means of utilizing an built-in amp in my principal system. Having not too long ago moved to an residence, my principal (and solely) system can now accommodate an built-in amplifier and is worthy of this degree of {hardware}. At this level, I fortunately mentioned sure to Robert and, wow, am I glad I did.

300B Tube

A Bit about 300B Tubes

The first 300B tubes have been made by Western Electric (WE) in 1938. The tube was in steady manufacturing for 50 years, however in 1988 that got here to a halt. These tubes have been extremely desired once they have been in manufacturing, however significantly so after manufacturing ceasedsome WE NOS 300Bs have been fetching hundreds of {dollars} apiece. I’ve had expertise with many 300Bs from Shuguang, Genelex, JJ, and Electro Harmonix, however haven’t had the pleasure of listening to Western Electrics despite the fact that manufacturing resumed in 1997. These new tubes are trustworthy reissues, however constructed to a a lot larger normal of producing and efficiency. While not cheap at $1495 a matched pair, they don’t seem to be stratospherically priced the way in which many NOS tubes are today.

I’ve ample expertise with 300Bs basically and love their sound. But I used to be by no means keen to pay for an NOS pair of WEs. Most new 300B tubes promote within the neighborhood of $150 to $220 per tube. So, one would instantly surprise why the brand new WE tubes are so costly relative to their competitors. There was a big sound high quality distinction among the many earlier tubes I attempted, however sadly those I most popular failed on quite a few events. (I purchased 4 tubes at one level and needed to substitute all of them inside six months. Two have been inside their 90-day guarantee interval; two weren’t. I not purchase this model of tube as a result of it’s simply too costly to exchange the tubes so steadily, to not point out the effort.) This is the place WE actually units itself aside by providing a five-year guarantee. That’s unparalleled for tubes and significantly stunning for an influence tube. The CEO of Western Electric, Charles Whitener, informed me that he has prospects who nonetheless have tubes in service from his first manufacturing run in 1997. That is over 20 years operating!

A Bit in regards to the “New” Western Electric

Charles Whitener had bought a earlier firm in one other business efficiently and was on the hunt for one thing new. He was captivated with high-end audio and famous the rising costs of 300Bs. He considered this as a chance and regarded for a strategy to faithfully deliver again the WE 300B. First, he had to purchase the naming and expertise rights from AT&T (the final homeowners of Western Electric). It took a very long time and lots of makes an attempt to lastly get AT&T to agree. In 1992, he began the revival. For his employees, he used individuals who had been with WE beforehand, working within the unique plant. With this experience and infrastructure, the pathway was clear. But, as any entrepreneur will let you know, there are all the time sudden challenges. For the brand new WE, glass was the problem. Unfortunately, the brand new firm misplaced a key worker who knew how you can make the glass. This delayed the primary launch till 1997. After that, WE assumed it could be clean crusing, however that was not the case. AT&T bought its WE plant to an investor, who turned the constructing into workplace area. The new WE misplaced its lease in 2002 and moved to Huntsville, Alabama. An analogous challenge occurred on this location, and in 2016 WE moved to Roseville, Georgia, and has been there since. (See the Factory Tour sidebar.)

In a chat with Charles, he described the design targets of the 91E very clearly. He wished the luxurious sound that’s so attribute of the 300B however with out the shortcomings. His need was for it to sound good from prime to backside, with low hysteresis. He described the challenges in reaching this purpose with single-ended topology, which usually wants large transformers that by their very nature are going to have important hysteresis. Additionally, Charles wished an ultra-low noise flooring, which is a problem for single-ended tubes and significantly for a 300B, which has a straight heated filament.

As you may anticipate, Charles wouldn’t have informed me about his targets had he not already achieved them, so I’ll spare you the suspense. The query stays, how is it attainable? There are some distinctive elements of the design that made Charles’ targets attainable. One was operating the tubes in Class A2. The A2 design is basically Class A that drives the grid of the tubes a bit of larger, delivering higher output. This achieve technique is definitely not new in any respect; actually, the essential circuit design is kind of outdated. But, to my information there isn’t every other 300B amplifier utilizing it. The second and patented portion of the design is the Steered Constant Current Source or SCCS. The fundamental concept of this patent is to extend the present on the idea of the load on the output terminal. Thus, if the load will increase so does the present, and if the load decreases so does the present. A 3rd attention-grabbing design parameter is the transformer itself. The A2 and SCCS enable for a smaller and lighter transformer, which helped meet Charles’ design purpose of lowered hysteresis. The transformer can also be distinctive in that it lacks the same old a number of faucets for varied impedance hundreds. There is only one set of binding posts; to alter the nominal impedance the transformer must be swapped out. This is definitely very straightforward to do due to the way in which the 91E is designed. Though it ships with no matter nominal impedance the unique purchaser specifies, it’s good to know that should you swap audio system and must make this alteration, the swap is comparatively simple and fairly priced at $999 for a second transformer. (According to Charles additional faucets on the transformer degrade sonics, so he opted for maybe an easier, albeit costlier strategy to favor the absolute best sound.)

The result’s a dependable single-ended 300B built-in amplifier with double the output energy (round 18–20 watts) that what one would usually anticipate. Yes, Charles achieved his technical targets, however the true proof is simply how good this built-in sounds.

Western Electric 91E Integrated Amplifier rear

Initial Setup

The 91E has six single-ended analog inputs, together with a phono enter that may be modified from mm to mc through a swap on the again panel. I presently don’t have a phono system arrange, so I used to be not capable of take a look at the phonostage. There can also be a Bluetooth antenna and connection. This was a bit of stunning to me, as Bluetooth audio high quality is proscribed and positively less than the sonics of the remainder of this product. Nevertheless, I wound up actually liking the characteristic as a result of I used to be capable of join my TV to the 91E through Bluetooth. No shock that it was infinitely higher than the built-in TV audio system. There are three outputs: the usual speaker binding posts, a line-level output, and a preamp output.

Installing the 300Bs is a bit of difficult in that it’s essential to open the “chimney” that homes the tubes. A hoop that may be rotated holds down a glass cylinder and grate. The ring is rotated barely counterclockwise utilizing a red-colored spanner software included within the equipment. The directions may very well be a bit of clearer on this space. There is multiple spanner software, so a drawing that exhibits which spanner and simply how the “chimney” is opened would have helped. Each of the tubes was labeled, one for the suitable channel and one for the left channel. While the tubes are matched, they’ve barely completely different beneficial properties. Each amplifier is calibrated for the tubes that can be utilized in it. The preamp part’s ECC81 tubes are put in on the manufacturing facility.

The unit had been damaged in for a day on the manufacturing facility, however I felt it most likely wanted extra time. I anticipated I would want to bias the tubes as effectively over the primary few days, however I used to be happy to find the 91E is auto biasing. The tubes are biased every time the amplifier is turned on. It takes about 30 seconds to heat up, then 30 seconds to watch and bias the tubes. The microcontroller within the 91E makes use of an analog-to-digital converter to pattern the plate voltage and present after which alter the grid voltage to the right worth. Tubes will drift over time, so this can be a nice characteristic. I’d have favored to know what sort of drift was occurring, significantly within the first week or so, however there isn’t a suggestions to the person as to what the bias settings are. I anticipate that the WEs drift lower than another makes of 300B, however I’ve no means of realizing for sure.

Initial Listening

At first hear, I might inform there was want for some break-in. There was a bit of harshness and imbalance, which I anticipated. I figured it could take a few weeks to get one of the best sound from the 91E. To my shock, the break-in gave the impression to be full in a matter of hours, reasonably than days or perhaps weeks.

Being very conversant in the 300B sound, I needed to begin with a collection of vocals. Roon was variety sufficient to combine a Holly Cole playlist for me, which additionally included Jane Monheit and Melody Gardot, amongst many extra of my favorites. This was an ideal start line and, wow, did the amp sound good with none substantial break-in. I used to be cooking dinner whereas casually listening and was already impressed. My spouse even commented on how good it sounded. She wouldn’t name herself an audiophile, however she has gotten a bit of spoiled by good sound. It was instantly apparent to her, because it was to me, that this was, certainly, a really particular piece of audio gear.

Curiosity

Having owned many tube amps and preamps I’ve discovered how a lot sonic change can happen by altering tubes. It’s normally enjoyable, however generally it may be irritating. I’ve a pleasant assortment of 300Bs, although they’re in storage. I did take into consideration digging them out and seeing simply how a lot of the sound high quality I used to be having fun with was a results of the WE tubes and the way a lot was owed to the 91E. But within the guide, there’s a clear warning: “The 91E was designed for operation with Western Electric manufactured 300B electron tubes. The software of non-original or replica-type 300B tubes might end in weakened efficiency, distorted sound, or sudden habits, probably harming each the amplifier and mentioned reproduction tubes.”

As a reviewer, I felt it essential to heed this warning. I’m certain the sound is a mix of each an excellent tube and a circuit that appears to be purpose-built for the WE glass. Although I’ll seemingly by no means actually know the reply to the query I posed, I received’t lose any sleep over it. The 91E sounds so extremely good, who cares?

Serious Listening

When you hear a system come collectively and actually gel, it not seems like a mix of assorted items of audio tools making an attempt to faithfully reproduce music; it seems like the true factor. The tools will get out of the way in which, and it turns into all in regards to the music. How the textures of a saxophone that resonate all the way in which from the reed to the horn tackle the three-dimensional high quality of the true instrument, or how a vocal feels as if the singer have been leaning over and whispering in your ear, like she or he have been truly current within the room. I used to be already experiencing this with the 91E, and I used to be simply getting began.

The WE’s output energy of round 20 watts is effectively fitted to my very environment friendly (94dB) audio system, which additionally current a simple load to drive. Nominal impedance is 4 ohms. The precise impedance throughout the audible frequencies varies from 2 ohms to 14 ohms. This is a tube-friendly pair of audio system. (This isn’t true for all audio system, so understand that difficult-to-drive hundreds might not fare as effectively.)

I continued with extra feminine vocals and jazz, which is generally what I take heed to anyway. Every observe I performed simply made me need to play extra. I might take heed to this amp for hours, and on the primary day of set up I did. And whereas vocals and jazz sounded one of the best I had heard on my system, I wished to see how different musical genres carried out. A system that may solely play one kind of music effectively is much too restricted for my musical tastes.

Starting off straightforward however nonetheless offering barely extra of a problem, I wished to see how the drum solo in Dave Brubeck’s Take 5 fared. The drums are dynamic but in addition have quite a lot of delicate texture to them (the load of the drum strokes range, and the drumheads’ tone is effectively pronounced). The 91E captured this in addition to I’d ever heard it. So, that simply naturally led me to see how effectively the 91E might deal with John Bonham on the drums. I personally just like the older Led Zeppelin; I and II are my go-to albums. Christopher Huston, who I labored with at Rives Audio for a few years, recorded Led Zeppelin II and was usually requested how he obtained the sound of these drums, because it actually is spectacular. Chris is extremely humble and would steadily reply: “I didn’t. John Bonham did. I simply documented it.” He later informed me he recorded the drums with solely three microphones. Three microphones? Now, that’s really superb! It is protected to say the WE 91E reproduced every thing Chris Huston “documented,” and it was magical. It captured the pace and pure uncooked dynamics of that distinctive sound John Bonham was well-known for!

I wished to proceed to steer towards an increasing number of troublesome forms of music to problem this amplifier. Dead Can Dance’s “Yugula” is an excellently recorded piece from the band’s Into the Labyrinth. It runs the total tonal vary, from very low bass to extra delicate vocals, keyboards, chimes, and sounds that give a way of area to the composition. All these delicate tones might be misplaced, and in some circumstances the depth of the bottom frequencies is usually rolled off, lowering the breadth of the soundstage. With the 91E, I used to be happy with every thing I heard. It felt just like the low frequencies have been all there, whereas the delicate overlays nearly floated in area, with extra dimensionality than I used to be accustomed to. Everything I used to be throwing at this built-in amp was seemingly too straightforward for it.

Several days later I made a decision to see if I might discover the bounds of the amp with Foo Fighters’ Medicine at Midnight. Here, the amp sounded a bit strained and compressed, and the underside finish thinned out. I then performed Eiji Oui Mephisto and Co., an excellent Reference Recording. On actually giant, dynamic passages, of which there are various, I heard the identical factor—a little bit of pressure and compression and a thinning of the underside octaves. Because these items have been a lot more difficult from a scale and dynamics standpoint, I assumed that the 20 watts of those 300Bs had lastly discovered their limits. But I used to be improper.

Just a few days handed, and I continued to be impressed with this built-in. I discovered myself scratching my head about what I had heard earlier. There was simply no pressure or compression on what I used to be listening to at this level, and I couldn’t consider that these two albums I examined sounded the way in which they did. So, I went again to each, and (now) they sounded unbelievable. There was no pressure, no compression, and a full backside finish. Not solely was the underside finish full, but it surely was additionally effectively managed and much better than I’ve ever heard from a 300B amplifier. Additionally, all of the mid and upper-end frequencies remained intact all through these difficult passages. I believe this has loads to do with the SCCS expertise, for the reason that huge voltage swings that always happen for decrease frequencies can create havoc with the present being delivered. After a bit extra experimenting, it grew to become clear that this amp wants extra warming up for every listening session than I had initially allowed. Sufficient warmup—round 45 minutes—leads to a a lot greater sonic distinction than I’ve heard with most amps. It’s nearly like a swap, the place the amp locks in and decides it’s sport time. Since I usually let the tools heat up with out listening significantly for some time, I didn’t actually admire simply how necessary this warm-up interval was with the 91E. Now that I do know this, it’s actually not a problem to me. But if you’re auditioning this built-in, you should definitely let it heat up amply earlier than passing judgment.

One portion of my listening was with a number of Edgar Meyer albums. These included Edgar Meyer and Chris Thile Uncommon Ritual, Appalachian Waltz, and Short Trip Home. Edgar Meyer’s bass enjoying is fantastic, and lots of of those albums are simply plain enjoyable. The distinction of sounds, significantly with Chris Thile’s mandolin, was fantastically reproduced—a delight to take heed to. Both devices have been completely true to their character. This might not have been probably the most demanding assessments, but it surely was pleasant.

Conclusion

The 91E is a really particular product. It has actual innovation in design that isn’t hype. It is delivering sound high quality past what I’ve beforehand heard from any 300B amplifier. The areas that it excels in redefined for me simply how nice a few of the recordings I listened to are. The finest sound I’ve achieved on this method was listening to jazz and vocals. The presentation was so natural and fluid that I simply wished to soften into the listening chair and hear for hours. The solely time I used to be not impressed was when the amp wasn’t adequately warmed up, and that was my fault, not that of the tools.

If you might be available in the market for an built-in tube amplifier and have ever been uncovered to the gorgeous sound that 300Bs can supply, the 91E is a should audition. And whereas not cheap at $15k, I discover it to be a particularly excessive worth for what it delivers. I’m very joyful WE is again and looking out ahead to extra improvements. Very extremely really useful! 

Specs & Pricing

Power output: 20Wpc into 8 or 4 ohms
Inputs: Six line, one phono (all RCA), Bluetooth v4.2
Outputs: Speaker degree on binding posts, preamplifier out, line out (all RCA)
Tube complement: ECC81 (preamplifier), one pair Western Electric 300B (output)
Dimensions: 18.9″ x 15″ x 11.1″
Weight: 49 lbs. (transport weight 94 lbs.)
Price: $14,999 (black or champagne), $15,999 (nickel)

WESTERN ELECTRIC
201 West Gordon Ave
Rossville, GA 30741
(404) 352-2000
westernelectric.com

The publish Western Electric 91E Integrated Amplifier and 300B Tube appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

HiFi Rose RA180 Integrated Amplifier

In December of 2021, my first review in The Absolute Sound was published—the HiFi Rose 150B streaming DAC. I thought so highly of the product that I bought the review sample, and it remains the core of my apartment system. I was delighted when attending AXPONA this year (well, weren’t we all delighted to be attending shows again?) to find that Rose had just released a new integrated amplifier, the RA180. For those not familiar with HiFi Rose, it is a relatively new company from Korea focused on streaming DACs. The RA180 is the company’s first product that does not include a DAC.

When I set eyes on this integrated amplifier, it was love at first Rose. One can’t deny the industrial design’s ingenuity. If someone asked me before seeing it what I would have expected a HiFi Rose integrated amplifier to look like, I would have responded “Super-clean like its streaming DAC, with a kind of minimalistic Scandinavian design.” As it turns out, this design is quite the opposite. About the only thing it has in common with the aesthetic of the company’s streaming DAC is the wonderful milled-aluminum outer case. Everything else is different. The faceplate has a retro, steam-punk look that absolutely works. It has the perfect balance of grit and elegance. Honestly, this piece is so good looking that it could’ve sounded terrible, and I’d still have wanted it in my equipment rack.

While its looks were nothing short of gorgeous, it was the sound of the $6995 RA180 that really drew me in. When I heard the HiFi Rose at AXPONA, it was driving Piega speakers, which I’m familiar with. Piegas tend be extremely revealing—sometimes almost to a fault. If there is any grain or harshness, particularly in the treble, Piega speakers will reveal it in a most unflattering way. That’s what really struck me about the RA180; there was no grain, no harshness, and no hint of sound that would bring on listener fatigue. The presentation was incredible relaxed, full bodied, and enjoyable. I quickly let Jon Derda of MoFi Distribution know that I was interested in a review sample.

The Technology and Design

When I interviewed Sean Kim, founder and president of HiFi Rose for the RS150B review, he emphasized that the most important aspect of the company’s designs was sound quality. He wasn’t after “great” sound; his goal was to make the “best” sound.

The RA180 is based on a Class D output stage, a technology that I’ve heard sound good in some cases and not very good in quite a few others. According to Kim, the primary issue with Class D amplifiers is the “dead time” between pulses when both transistors in the opposing pair are turned off. To shorten this dead time, HiFi Rose uses GaN (gallium nitride) transistors and increased the switching frequency to 100kHz. Kim also wanted the RA180 to have a phonostage along with true bi-amping capability, with four independent amplifiers within the RA180’s chassis.

The RA180s four separate amplifiers with bi-amplifying capability is unique in that it offers four possible configurations: First, two of the RA180’s 200W amplifiers (into 8 ohms) can drive a pair of speakers with a single pair of input jacks—nothing special here. Second, bi-wirable speakers can be driven by all four of the RA180’s amplifiers; two amplifiers drive the pair of speaker’s low-frequency sections and the RA180’s two additional amplifiers drive the pair of speaker’s midrange/tweeter sections. The third option is to bridge the amplifier channels to drive single-wire speakers (“BTL Mode”), increasing the RA180’s output power to 400Wpc. Finally, the RA180 offers the option of engaging a high-pass filter on one pair of amplifiers specifically to drive a super-tweeter. In this configuration, two of the RA180’s amplifiers drive the full-range speaker, and two drive the super-tweeter with a frequency-response-optimized signal with frequency extension to 100kHz. This flexibility allows you to optimize the RA180 for your system, as well as to change configurations in the future as your system evolves.

Initial Setup

Setting up the RA180 is straightforward. There are three pairs of single-ended inputs, one phono input, and a pair of balanced inputs. A rear-panel switch selects between mm or mc gain. A front-panel control lets you choose different phono equalization curves, but there’s no cartridge-loading adjustment. (I did not use a turntable with this unit, so was not able to evaluate the phono input.) A 12V trigger and IR control round out the rear panel. The inclusion of these control jacks allows the RA180 to be controlled by external automation systems.

The outputs are a little less straightforward. There are 16 binding posts on the rear panel. It took me a little while to figure them all out. First off, these outputs offer the ability to drive two separate sets of speakers, as well as to bi-amp one or both sets of speakers (hence the need for 16 binding posts). There is also one RCA output jack to drive a subwoofer, a useful feature.

Most high-end electronics today eschew bass and treble controls, but not the RS180. The last time I had a system with tone controls was in the 70s. Fortunately, there is a bypass switch to remove the tone controls from the signal path. There is also a “pure direct” input, which bypasses the preamplifier section altogether, turning the RA180 into a power amplifier.

Initial Listening

I started in the regular (200Wpc) mode, thinking this would supply more than enough power. In fact, it did. Indeed, I was able to reduce the output of the HiFi Rose 150B streaming DAC feeding the RA180. The review sample was a brand-new unit, which to my knowledge had not been burned in, so I expected to hear the usual unimpressive sound with the usual grain, dynamic restraint, and imbalance that naturally occur as components break in. That was not the case. Right out of the box, during the first minute of listening, the RA180 was much more enticing than what I was accustomed to on my system. I immediately noticed a superior balance top to bottom. I expected this from a solid-state design, but what I did not expect was the openness of the overall presentation. Most solid-state amps I’ve used in the past were very constrained until they had been burned in for at least a few hundred hours. This was immediate bliss. I was wondering if it was going to get better (it was a little hard to imagine that it could), but while listening intently in the first week of burn-in I did notice subtle improvements.

Everyday Use

I think it’s important to consider how a unit performs playing background music. Not all listening has to be critical, with you seated in the sweet spot, concentrating on every cue. My current system is in the main living area, which is also the kitchen, my home office, and the dining room…well, you get the point. When the system is in a shared space like this, it’s also a shared system. Other family members need to be able to use the system independently. It should be ergonomically intuitive. This is the only area that I really had some questions about the RA180’s design.

It all has to do with remote functions. It’s important to consider how one uses the equipment on a day-to-day basis. The remote for the RA180 is an infrared model with a rear-panel input plug for custom installations. Bravo to HiFi Rose for that, as I was not super-happy about the Bluetooth remote for its streaming DAC. The RA180 remote also has direct access to each of the inputs (rather than one-up/one-down input selection). Another plus for Rose. Unfortunately, I had to scratch my head when I realized that the two different remote technologies were not cross-compatible. Although I was not a fan of the Bluetooth remote for the streaming DAC, I’m less of a fan of using two remotes, and perhaps a tablet as well, to select music. It would be really nice if one remote could control both products within a manufacturer’s product line. In the grand scheme of things, this is a minor point and one that did not hinder my enjoyment of the RA180, but I felt that for some readers it could be important and should be mentioned.

Other than that small demerit, ergonomics and ease of use were terrific. Anyone in the family can easily use the RA180 without dreading that he or she will press the wrong button.

Serious Listening

After a few weeks of burning in the unit, I felt the RA180 was ready to really be listened to. I have a method for going about serious listening when I’m evaluating any product, which I have not described previously and feel is worth mentioning. First, I regularly listen to a lot of different types of music—from large-scale classical to chamber music, jazz of all types (female vocal being my favorite), rock, pop, and R&B. When I evaluate any product or when listening at a show, I always like to hear a broad range of music. It’s rare to find a system that does everything exceptionally well, and the ones that do are often well out of my price range. My system does most everything well, as it doesn’t tend to favor one type of music over another. A good example of this is to consider horn-based speakers versus planar speakers. Horns tend to deliver great dynamics but may lack spatial nuances in the soundstage. Rock music and large orchestral works tend to be favored by these speakers. Planar speakers are quite the opposite, as they provide excellent spatial cues and detail but lack the dynamics. Female vocals and chamber works tend to sound best with these speakers. Depending on the speakers selected, appropriate amplification must be chosen to match, as well.

The tube amps that I had been using prior to installing the RA180 were push-pull KT88-based and had very good dynamics with reasonably flat frequency response. Tube-based amplifiers in general will have a lower damping factor than solid-state counterparts—that is, less ability to control the woofer’s motion after the drive signal has stopped. This became extremely apparent while listening to the RA180. The RA180 exhibited much more control in the bottom end on complex orchestral music such as Stravinsky’s The Firebird. The amplifier seemed to have no bounds. It could certainly play far louder than I would ever want to hear, but even at relatively high volumes, it just seemed effortless from top to bottom. Normally, I find large dynamic passages can cause other instruments, particularly strings, to either fade out or take on an unpleasant edge and grain. Not with this amp. Everything stayed together in the right place with the right tonality, no matter the level.

I decided to go to one of my favorites for testing, János Starker playing Bach’s Cello Suites. You’ll probably find I use this piece a lot in my reviews, and it’s because it can reveal all sorts of problems in a system. If there is an imbalance from the upper bass through the mids, it will be exposed. This is particularly true for any crossover problems (this was a piece we used regularly to test for these issues when I was working with Talon Speakers). I decided it was time to try the BTL mode that bridges the four 200W amplifier channels into two 400W channels. I first started listening without BTL to Suite No. One. It sounded terrific. It was full, balanced, and excellently detailed. There was no hint of coloration or other flaws that I could detect. I then switched over to the BTL mode, which combines two channels and increases the output. (I reduced the signal output from the HiFi Rose 150B to 1000mV to compensate.)

HiFi Rose says BTL is for difficult loads. My speakers certainly are not, but I had to try it. What I found was a smoother, more fleshed-out soundstage. Staging was already really good, but this just made it sound more organic. The cello had better dimensionality, weight, and resonance within the larger soundstage than it had before. It sounded more natural. There was no question in my mind that BTL was better, so I did the remainder of my listening in this mode.

Hugh Masekela’s Grazing in the Grass is wonderfully recorded and did not disappoint. The bass was fuller and better defined than I had heard before on my system. The soundstage was beautifully presented from left to right, though on this recording there’s not a lot of depth. I then moved to large-scale classical music with Mahler’s Ninth Symphony This piece is one I find to be particularly challenging for many systems. It’s so complex, with minute details occurring at the same time as large crescendos. Most systems can do some passages well, but almost all have gaps where they can’t perform. Now remember, we are not listening to a cost-no-object system, so expectations should be reasonable. At higher levels, I know I will get some compression, but while temporarily living in an apartment, I don’t have speakers that can move enough air at convincing volumes for this piece. However, I can play loud enough without compression to know if an amplifier is able to deliver. The RA180 performed without flaw. What I really would have loved to do was connect it to some much larger and possibly more difficult-to-drive speakers to see how far this integrated amplifier could go. From what I could detect, it had a lot of horsepower to spare, and I would need to go a long way to even begin to push its limits. I would expect this unit could drive all but the most difficult and inefficient speakers out there with ease.

Much of my listening is jazz with a lot of female vocal jazz selections. Recently, Roon had mixed a “Kandice Springs” playlist for me that my wife and I listened to for at least an hour and a half. It wasn’t critical listening, but we were seated in a good position, listening at a level comfortable enough to have a conversation. There were a few times I had to stop and really focus on the music because it just sounded so good. The sound was natural and relaxed, with absolutely no strain. Tonality, definition, and soundstage were consistently right on. The fact that I was pulled into the music without conscious effort, because the sound was so good, is a major win for this product and speaks volumes for its future success.

Conclusion

After reviewing the HiFi Rose 150B streaming DAC, I was so impressed that I purchased the review sample. It has remained the digital heart of my system. The RA180 ranks in the same league as the HiFi Rose 150B. It offers value both in build and sound quality, significantly surpassing its price point. This unit has the headroom to handle just about any speaker. And while sound quality is certainly the most important criterion, I must say, again, that the industrial design of this unit is spectacular. HiFi Rose is a relative newcomer to this market, but there’s no doubt the company is here to stay.

Specs & Pricing

Inputs: Three single-ended on RCA jacks, one balanced on XLR jack, one phono, selectable mm or mc.
Output: Subwoofer out on RCA jack
Power output: 200Wpc into 8 ohms (four channels); 400Wpc into 8 ohms (two channels)
Dimensions: 16.9″ x 5.1″ x 13.8″
Weight: 36.8 lbs.
Price: $6995

HIFI ROSE (MoFi Distribution, U.S. distributor)
mofidistribution.com

The post HiFi Rose RA180 Integrated Amplifier appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

2022 Golden Ear: Bluesound Powernode Gen 3 Streaming DAC and Integrated Amplifier

Bluesound Powernode Gen 3 Streaming DAC and Integrated Amplifier

$949

The Bluesound Powernode Gen 3 is an all-in-one stereo (or multi-room) system for modern times, incorporating wired and wireless streaming, DAC, analog inputs, and power amp, with full control from the BluOS app, which can be run on (almost) any computing or mobile platform. It includes everything you might need except for phono preamplifier, speaker cables, or speakers, in a compact and unobtrusive chassis. The real story here is the surprisingly good sound for the price. The Powernode Gen 3 easily fits into systems that include other components (even cables) that cost as much or more than the Bluesound unit itself without embarrassing itself sonically. Slightly on the mellow and forgiving side of neutral, it should pair well with a wide variety of speakers and rooms; yet it still provides plenty of detail and microdynamics for a surprising amount of satisfaction from all genres of music. Also surprising is the amount of power available—130W (8 ohms) and 220W (4 ohms) of IHF dynamic power for musical peaks.

The post 2022 Golden Ear: Bluesound Powernode Gen 3 Streaming DAC and Integrated Amplifier appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

Rogue Audio Cronus Magnum III Integrated Amplifier

Spoiler alert—I love this amp!

By starting with such a bold statement, I don’t mean to suggest that the latest iteration of Rogue Audio’s Cronus Magnum is without flaws. (What is?) I’ll get to that later, but for now let me begin with this: Here we have a terrific-sounding, all-tube integrated amp that is so musically engaging, such a joy to use, and such a superb value that it’s completely won me over.

Actually, it’s won me over for a second time, as a decade ago I was likewise highly enthusiastic about Rogue’s original Cronus Magnum. But as good as that version was the latest iteration punches several levels above, thanks to a slew of tasty upgrades.

Designed by Rogue Audio’s owner Mark O’Brien, the all-tube Cronus Magnum III ($3495) features an upgraded triode preamp circuit coupled with Rogue’s Atlas Magnum power amp (which goes for $2995 as a stand-alone unit). The III version also incorporates improved component parts throughout, a beefier power supply, as well as refashioned low-voltage supplies for the MOSFET, buffered, discrete headphone circuit and the phono section. I’m also pleased to report that the latter now handles both mm and mc cartridges, with five user-adjustable load settings, as well as 45dB and 60dB gain options.

Rogue Audio Cronus Magnum III Integrated Amplifier rear

(One thing to note: If you live near a radio transmission tower—as I do, about a five-mile straight shot across the hills from my house in San Francisco—the Magnum III’s phonostage is sensitive to RF. So, take extra care with placement as well as cable dressing to minimize this extraneous noise. It’s not particularly noticeable with most music but can be during quiet or between-track passages.) 

The design’s tube complement (two 12AX7, three 12AU7, and four KT120 output tubes) now allows users to switch “on the fly” between triode or “ultralinear” (pentode) output modes, and power output has increased from 90 to 100Wpc (half of that when operating in the triode mode). The gold-plated binding posts can be rewired to optimize speaker matching for 4- or 8-ohms loads but note that, as with the original design, users will need to remove the amp’s top plate to rejigger the wiring at the posts (as well as to change the phono settings). The process takes a few minutes but is otherwise pretty straightforward.

Also, as with the original edition, a handy, removable, small rectangular top plate allows easy access to the bias adjustments for the output tubes—the supplied plastic screwdriver even has a convenient resting nook tucked behind the tube array. Biasing is a snap to accomplish and something owners will want to check every few months, as well as down the road when a new tube set is installed.

Finally, a machined aluminum remote allows for volume control as well as muting, but you’ll need to get your bum off the couch to switch inputs.

I should also note that everything about the design, build, and fit and finish is first-rate, reflecting the company’s dedication to quality.

Sonically, the Cronus Magnum III is really quite remarkable, especially when compared to the far pricier gear I’m used to in my reference system. No, it doesn’t provide the same degrees of resolution, staging, detail, and dynamics as my references. But then that’s like expecting a village Burgundy to compete with a grand cru. That’s hardly the point of the design. Because the thing is: This amp is musical; it rocks; it’s fun; and lo and behold, it isn’t tweaky. It’s warm sounding but not fat; it’s airy; its resolution is plenty satisfying. It is simply very, very good. The Magnum III’s is not a “wow” kind of sound but rather a let’s pull you into the music kind of sound.

For example, on Analogue Productions’ stunning-sounding UHQR of Are Your Experienced? Mitch Mitchell’s drums on “Waterfall” are tuneful and natural, rollicking along with Hendrix’s dreamy guitar work; Noel Redding’s bass at once anchors things, while floating with the musical tide.

On “Fire,” you really hear and feel the distorted crunch of Hendrix’s Strat/Marshall combo, as well as key in on the album’s mic placement and mixing, which you’ll notice changes from track to track, bringing Hendrix’s potent debut to life. 

One caveat for owners of power-hungry speakers like my Maggie 1.7i’s shouldn’t surprise: A bit more additional punch and power would be a welcome thing. But then again, most speakers aren’t as demanding as Magnepans are. And when it does top-out, the Magnum III doesn’t go into distortion mode but comfortably cruises along at its maximum volume setting.

Another caveat. As with the original Magnum, the III does overlay a fine granular texture on the sound. It’s noticeable but not a major distraction. In some ways it’s actually a kind of cool additive. On “Two of Us,” from the Beatles’ 50th anniversary edition of Let it Be, one really senses the sound of the vintage analog gear; Lennon and Harrison’s Epiphone and Gibson guitars plugged into Fender amps, the thick strings and warm tonality of Paul’s signature Hofner bass, and the skin-and-wood tonality of Ringo’s Ludwig kit.

Moving on to Bill Evans’ Complete Sunday at the Village Vanguard shows the amp’s way with a great-sounding live acoustic set. Right away you’ll notice the acoustic ambience and three-dimensionality of this famed venue’s space, the natural feeling of air surrounding the instruments, the tonal and textural resolution of the piano, bass, and drums.

Finally, turning to my well-loved DG LP of Evgeny Kissin’s live recital of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No 32; while the Magnum III may be missing the nth degree of focus, tonal purity, dynamic nuance, and lower octave drive of the far pricier Sutherland and VTL gear of my reference system, the hypnotic second movement, with its ragtime-like bridge, really shines, drawing one into the emotional and intellectual power of this piece, with its lovely harmonic richness leading to the final and breathtaking denouement. 

Circling back to my initial points about imperfections, and that all designs possess them—why else keep pushing the envelope?—it’s interesting to think about how, throughout audio history, certain memorable designs have identifiable shortcomings that don’t greatly detract from their overall excellence. I’ll cite the original Quad electrostatic speaker, the Rogers L3/5A mini-monitor, and the Audio Research SP6 preamp as examples of designs that so wonderfully capture the gestalt of the music that we’re able to live with and listen past their imperfections, because they are so very good at drawing us into and conveying the music.

Each of those designs is, of course, considered a classic. I can’t say if Rogue’s Cronus Magnum III will stand that test of time. But I will say that, in its own way, it is just as deserving.

Specs & Pricing

Power output: 100Wpc
Tube complement: 3x 12AU7, 2x 12AX7, 4x KT120
Inputs: Phono, Line 1, 2, 3
Dimensions: 17.5″ x 6.75″ x 18″
Weight: 55 lbs.
Price: $3495

Rogue Audio, Inc.
545 Jenna Drive
Brodheadsville, PA 18322
(570) 992-9901
rogueaudio.com

The post Rogue Audio Cronus Magnum III Integrated Amplifier appeared first on The Absolute Sound.

2022 Golden Ear: Technics SU-R1000 Reference Class Integrated Amplifier

Technics SU-R1000 Reference Class Integrated Amplifier

$9499

Having said this, my final selection is the Technics SU-R100. Its phono cartridge optimizer is another demonstration of what digital correction and processing can do—even to the front-end component that most audiophiles treat as anti-digital. I think it does a very good job of getting the best out of a given cartridge, even though its “English” instructions have their limits. More broadly, it has one of the best-sounding digital amplifiers I’ve encountered and a very-good-sounding set of digital coax and optical inputs. Neutral rather than warm, it has lots of detail and really good dynamics for a unit of 150Wpc (8 ohms) to 300Wpc (4 ohms) output power. Also, it is a compact solution that offers the capabilities that normally require three separate components—no need to invest in interconnects between such components—and it is priced at a very affordable level for a design this advanced. 

The post 2022 Golden Ear: Technics SU-R1000 Reference Class Integrated Amplifier appeared first on The Absolute Sound.