Interested in Dan D’Agostino’s most extensive amplifier upgrade in 11 years? Want to watch a D’Agostino Momentum S250 stereo amplifier get upgraded to the new Momentum S250 MxV? Curious about how well it can ignite […]
Tag Archives: Upgrade
First, some naming clarification. The DC in DC2 stands for DualCoherent crossover—the principal technology that set YG speakers apart from other multiway speakers when YG was founded in 2002 (and still sets them apart, as far as I know). YG developed a loudspeaker crossover that simultaneously optimized frequency response and relative phase. Most designs sacrifice either frequency response or phase alignment for better performance in one domain or the other. DC2 is the latest and most significant update to YG’s crossover technology. The standard DualCoherent crossover has also undergone various refinements over the years (updates to parts, layout, circuit board, and mounting, etc.), but I believe the DC2 is the first crossover available as a stand-alone upgrade. YG makes its own circuit boards, by the way, along with driver membranes, cabinets, binding posts, footers, and even coils—all in Denver, Colorado. For more information about YG and the Sonja 2.2 speaker, please see my review in Issue 279. For more about relative phase, please consult Editor-in-Chief Robert Harley’s book, The Complete Guide to High-End Audio. Even if you don’t have a DC2-ready speaker or ever will, this new YG crossover demonstrates the value of improved relative phase in a multiway design.
Second, some development background. In a discussion with YG back in 2018, I was told that they were finalizing a significant crossover redesign and that it had been in the works for about a year. Without wanting to talk a lot about it at the time, they did mention that the update would improve relative phase response even more than the current production crossovers did at that time. In the standard DualCoherent crossover, the overlap between the tweeter and mid/woofer drivers was optimized, and a wider relative phase tolerance in the mid/woofer and bass driver overlap was accepted to achieve overall beneficial phase behavior in the speaker system. DC2 now makes the relative phase response of both the upper- and lower-frequency overlap zones (at 1.75kHz and 65Hz, respectively), for all intents and purposes, the same: ±5 degrees. Importantly, frequency response remains ±1dB in the audible band, per YG. DC2 was first made available in the two-tower Sonja XVi and XVi Studio models in 2018 and then offered as an update in the Sonja 2.xi in 2019. All current Sonja models ship from the factory with the DC2 crossover.
The Sonja 2.2i’s in my system were updated in the field, and this would also be the case with all other DC2-ready models. (Updating the crossover to DC2 changes the 2.2 model designation to 2.2i.) The crossover exchange can be done by one trained person, usually a dealer or distributor. YG sent Dick Diamond and Gary Mulder, both very knowledgeable, interesting, and affable people with lengthy experience in the high-end industry. Only the Sonja’s upper-cabinet crossover needed to be updated. The lower (or bass) cabinet does not need to have its crossover changed. The whole process took about two hours for both speakers. The newer crossover looks quite different from the standard assembly. DC2 is larger and heavier and has more components on it. The DC2 upgrade price is $11,500 for Sonja 2.x models and $37,000 for Sonja XV models.
As long as flat frequency response is achieved—or as close to it as is possible—does narrowing the relative phase tolerances in multiway speakers really matter all that much in a practical sense? I can’t argue that it does from a technical perspective, but the more I’ve learned about the importance of the time domain in audio the more I have come to appreciate the value of improved relative phase. In the case of YG speakers, you get both excellent frequency response and relative-phase behavior, so it is not an either/or proposition. All I can say is that updating to DC2 in the already high-performing Sonja 2.2 brought more sonic improvements than I anticipated or thought possible. So, yes, in this instance, I think relative phase matters a lot.
When one considers that just the high-pass section of the mid/woofer-filter’s phase alignment was the principle change to the crossover, the overall sonic advancement is nothing short of astonishing. The summarizing sonic descriptor here is “lucid.” The entire presentation became more transparent, more intelligible, more immediate, more present, more vivid. There is also no attendant downside, no spotlighting or exaggeration from top to bottom. The Sonja remains neutral.
I feel a little silly about carrying on about a seemingly minor crossover tweak. But music playback became more immersive and, well, more interesting. Much of this can be attributed to an increase in resolution of low-level detail. For example, there are some subtle, low-pitched thumps or “knocks” buried in the mix of a live recording of Bob Walsh performing “Ain’t No Sunshine” [En Spectacle/Live, Les Disques Bros.]. The source of these thumps could be from the guitar pickups registering mechanical contact as the guitar gently bumps up against the microphone stand when Walsh moves while he plays and sings. Or the mic could be picking up the sound of its stand being lightly knocked by the guitar. Or both. I had noticed some of these thumps pre-DC2, but I quickly realized with DC2 that there are more of them, and they occur pretty much throughout the song, every few seconds. Hearing this live recording with that increase in resolution—thumps and all—made me feel as if I were witnessing an event, rather than merely listening to a recorded song again.
I heard more details on every recording I played. Everything sounded more fully rendered, more fleshed out, and thus more alive. So, with better relative phase alignment comes less time smear, which seems to lead to better resolution. At least that is my working hypothesis. The Sonja 2.2i sounds both more lithe and more controlled—able to start and stop more quickly, if you will. In this regard, the updated Sonja reminded me more of an electrostatic speaker (but with greater dynamic range, bass weight, and extension) than its non-updated version did. Let me also mention that bass pitch definition and dynamic crispness were also improved. Nothing in the bass module was changed, so DC2 apparently cleans up the lower range of the mid/woofer (and its overlap with the bass driver) to the extent that it influenced my perception of bass quality. The impression of greater slam and dynamic agility is definitely apparent. This makes perfect sense when one considers the 65Hz crossover point, above which there is plenty of bass energy.
Soundstage depth became more layered, and the interstitial haziness that sometimes clouds the spaces between images was cleared up. The soundstage seemed to open up a bit more across the board. How could improving phase in the lower overlap help imaging and the rendering of “space” around instruments to the extent I was hearing? I would expect this sort of soundstaging improvement if the upper overlap, closer to the frequency range where imaging information exists, had been improved. I cannot explain it, but it’s there. Whatever technical reasons are involved, the DC2 crossover brought about the same kinds of improvements in resolution, soundstaging, and dynamic agility that I heard when the ground-breaking YG BilletDome hybrid tweeter was introduced in early 2018 (see my Sonja 2.2 review)—which is to say, very rewarding performance increases, indeed. Is the pre-DC2 Sonja 2.2 still a great speaker? Yes, but better is better, and DC2 advances the Sonja further.
YG’s DC2 crossover improves the Sonja 2.2i’s overall sound quality more than I imagined was possible, and I presume similar or greater improvements are conferred on the upper Sonja models, as well. It is as if a key piece of a building were put in place, and the integrity of the entire structure became more robust. The DC2 crossover “unifies” more of the listening experience. YG has pursued both flat frequency response and a low relative phase angle with excellent results. The DC2 update further validates its approach. The time domain matters a lot in this game. I continue to be impressed with YG speakers, and the DC2-equipped Sonja 2.2i is another resounding success.
Specs & Pricing
Sonja 2.2i speaker
Driver complement: One 1″ YG BilletDome tweeter, two 6″ YG BilletCore mid-woofers (main module), one 10.25″ YG BilletCore woofer (bass module)
Frequency response: Usable output below 20Hz to above 40kHz
Sensitivity: 88dB/2.83V/1m anechoic
Impedance: 4 ohms nominal, 3.2 ohms minimum
Recommended amplifier power: Minimum, 60 high-current watts
Crossover points: 65Hz and 1.75kHz
Cabinet: Aircraft-grade milled aluminum
Dimensions: 13″ x 51″ x 25″
Weight: 271 lbs. each
Price: $88,300 in standard black or silver anodized finish (other special finishes/colors available)
DC2 crossover upgrade: $11,500 for Sonja 2.x models; $37,000 for Sonja XV models
YG ACOUSTICS LLC
4941 Allison, St., Unit 12
Arvada, CO 80002
(801) 726-3887
yg-acoustics.com
Associated Equipment
Analog source: Basis Debut V turntable & Vector 4 tonearm, Benz-Micro LP-S MR cartridge
Phonostage: Simaudio Moon 610LP
Digital sources: Hegel Mohican CDP, HP Envy 15t running JRiver MC-20, Hegel HD30 DAC
Linestages: Ayre K-1xe, Hegel P30
Integrated amplifier: Hegel H390
Power amplifiers: Gamut M250i, Hegel H30
Speakers: YG Acoustics Sonja 2.2i, Dynaudio Confidence C1 Signature
Cables: Shunyata Sigma V2 signal cables, Shunyata Sigma USB, Shunyata Alpha S/PDIF and AES/EBU, Shunyata Sigma NR and Omega XC power cords
A/C power: Two 20-amp dedicated lines, Shunyata SR-Z1 receptacles, Shunyata Everest 8000 and Typhon power conditioners
Accessories: PrimeAcoustic Z-foam panels and DIY panels, Stillpoints Ultra SS
The post YG Acoustics DC2 Crossover Update in Sonja 2.2i Loudspeaker appeared first on The Absolute Sound.
Shortly after my review of the ModWright PH 9.0 phonostage (linked here), Dan Wright reached out to inform me of a new upgraded model (ModWright PH 9.0X) and asked if I’d like to listen to […]
The following is a press release issued by McIntosh.
Binghamton, NY | September 8, 2021 – McIntosh, the global leader in prestigious home entertainment and ultimate-quality audio for over 70 years, is proud to announce an 8K compatibility upgrade for the MX123 A/V Processor.
Since it was launched in October 2019, the MX123 has become a must have audio and video processor for countless home theaters. It launched with 4K/60Hz compatibility, but as technology has progressed and as McIntosh adheres to its philosophy of continuous product improvement, all new MX123 A/V Processors shipping from the McIntosh factory starting in September 2021 will support 8K/60Hz and 4K/120Hz video resolutions and refresh rates. The MX123 will also be able to upscale lower resolutions to 8K.
Of its 10 HDMI inputs and outputs, one of the inputs and two of the outputs will have 8K/60Hz and 4K/120Hz support (all 10 will continue to support 4K/60Hz). The three HDMI ports that are 8K/60Hz and 4K/120Hz compatible will also offer many other advanced features including Quick Media Switching (QMS); Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM); Quick Frame Transport (QFT); and Variable Refresh Rate (VRR).
All 10 of the HDMI ports support HDCP 2.3; Rec. 2020; 4:4:4 color spacing; Dynamic Lip-sync; and 3D Video pass-through. And all 10 will also now support a myriad of high dynamic range formats such as HDR (static HDR); Dynamic HDR; HDR10+; HLG; and Dolby Vision (including low latency).
In addition to these exciting video upgrades, the MX123 will continue to offer an impressive list of audio capabilities: 13.2 audio channels; Dolby Atmos (including Dolby Atmos Height Virtualizer); DTS:X Pro; Auro-3D; Sony’s 360 Reality Audio; MPEG-H Audio; IMAX Enhanced; eARC/ARC; Apple AirPlay 2; Bluetooth; Spotify Connect; and Audyssey MultEQ XT32. To facilitate integration into home automation systems, it also has Connects with Control4 Certification from Control4 and Works with Crestron Home certification from Crestron.
Pricing and Availability
MX123 8K units will start shipping from the McIntosh factory to their global dealer network beginning in September 2021. Orders can now be placed with Authorized McIntosh dealers. The 4K version of the MX123 is no longer available from McIntosh.
Suggested retail price (VAT, shipping and any customs duties related to current standards of individual countries are excluded): $8,500 USD.
The post McIntosh Announces 8K Upgrade to MX123 A/V Processor appeared first on The Absolute Sound.
Some deals are almost too good to be true. My long time friend (and lawyer) Hiram Katz taught me the basics of reading legal descriptions, and to date I’ve never spent more than a day in jail. So when I found myself this morning skimming the enclosed press release of the Sonus faber Trade-Up offer for details, I couldn’t help but fall back into the familiar habit of murmuring to myself, “He who?” But this time, it was more snarky and like, “They didn’t say what brand of speaker.” Obviously this limited time offer applies to existing Sonus faber customers who are looking to trade-up for something newer, bigger, better in the line-up. But the question remains, does the enclosed description mean that the trade-up deal is also available to non-Sonus faber speaker owners? I’m not sure. I say, decide for yourself with the enclosed press release below. And if you’re feeling feisty, contact your nearest Sonus faber dealer to gather the specific details and also set up an audition. Sonus faber wow’d us in 2020 with their new (award winning) entry level Lumina III tower speaker (reviewed here). Press Release Below SONUS FABER ANNOUNCES 2021 TRADE UP PROGRAM The […]
DISCLAIMER: MusicTeck and PW Audio provided me with the Monile in-ear headphone cable in return for my honest opinion. I am not personally affiliated with the companies in any way, nor do I receive any monetary rewards for a positive evaluation. I’d like to thank MusicTeck and PW Audio for their kindness and support. The review is as follows.
PW Audio is an aftermarket cable maker run by its founder and namesake, Peter Wong. The Hong-Kong-based company, though of a more understated, less-publicised niche than your ALO Audio’s or PlusSound’s, have successfully attained an incredible following through raw quality and word-of-mouth. Their offerings often find themselves on the top-ten lists of enthusiasts and reviewers alike. And, they’ve also collaborated with a number of brands as the default cable provider for their flagship in-ears; most recently, the Oriolus Traillii from Japan, the Empire Ears Odin from the U.S. and the Lime Ears Pneuma from Europe. Today, we’re looking at a PW Audio release reminiscent of their classic, cotton-sheathed, high-end cables, but at a more affordable price. PW’s Monile is clean, zingy and vocal-first, with bite and finesse in equal measure.

PW Audio Monile
- Wire composition: 26 AWG copper and 25.5 AWG silver
- Default configuration: 2-wire
- Key feature(s) (if any): Black-cotton shielding, coaxial design
- Price: $551.99
- Website: www.pwaudio.com.hk; shop.musicteck.com
Packaging, Accessories and Build
The Monile arrives in a black, cardboard box with the PW Audio logo printed atop a glossy-white inlay. This has been PW’s standard retail packaging for quite some time now, and I personally think it’s due for an update; for their mid- to higher-tier offerings, especially. Whether it’s a full-fledged update or tiny tweaks like embossing the logo in metallic-gold directly onto the box, for example, I think a premium product like this Monile deserves a more fitting garb. Plus, they’ll look great on store shelves too. Looks aside, I also would’ve liked to see a bit of padding on the box’s interior. But, since there aren’t any heavy or fragile components in there anyway, and the products are all somewhat cushioned by the plastic bags they each come in, it’s not too big an issue. So, again, while not the most elegant packaging in the world, it works nonetheless.

Inside, you’ll find the Monile itself, along with the included accessories. The first is a brick-red, leather cable tie that locks with a snap-button mechanism. It features white stitching around the outside; a nice, clean touch. Then, despite the tie’s overall more rugged, rustic motif, the leather itself is smooth to the touch too. As I’ve always expressed, the inclusion of cable ties with aftermarket cables is virtually mandatory in this day and age. So, kudos to PW Audio for their efforts here.
The second accessory PW have included is a carrying pouch, which, I must say, caught me by quite a surprise because of how premium it looks and feels. It’s constructed out of this black, velvet material, and I think it’s a brilliant callback to the cotton shielding that’s on the Monile’s conductors. It’s even got their PW Audio logo embossed onto the front, which is an incredibly sleek, classy touch. These are the stylings I’d love to see go to their retail packaging in the future. The inside of the pouch is lined with a soft, fabric mesh, which should cushion both the cable and any attached IEMs nicely. Lastly, the pouch can be pulled shut with the side straps. Again, it’s a clean accessory from PW, and a great inclusion for the Monile.

And, lastly, we get to the cable itself, which – as expected – is pretty-flawlessly made. It features PW’s classic, black-cotton shielding popularised by their flagship 1960’s. And, much like it, this gives the Monile a strikingly soft, silky feel, especially when compared to the more plasticky, PVC-based insulation that’s now the norm. Then, the cable’s coaxial design means it house all 4 of its cores within a 2-wire design for even more comfort. There is a difference, though, between the 1960’s and the Monile: Conductor size. The latter has a slightly thicker profile due to its larger wire gauge, and it’s made it a hair heftier and more robust too. I personally prefer this over the 2-wire 1960’s, which can, at times, seem a tad insubstantial. Hopefully, it’ll also stop tiny bends from forming on the IEM side of the Y-split, which I’ve often seen on the 2-wire 1960’s.
Hardware-wise, PW have gone for a really clean, minimalist aesthetic; dipped fully in chrome-silver. Both the 4.4mm plug and the Y-split sport this hexagonal profile to them, which both looks nice and shows great continuity. This extends even to its cable cinch, which does a good job staying in place; even with fervent head-banging. On the 2-pin connectors, you’ll see black and red stripes for Left and Right, respectively. And, you’ll also get PW Audio branding on the plug and Y-split, as well as Monile and a serial number engraved on the latter. Though I like how crisp this branding looks, I do think there’s a bit of a colour-clash on this Y-split between its black and silver texts. I would’ve liked the PW Audio and Monile logos sit on opposite sides, instead of beside one another. And, the serial number would’ve looked better much smaller too. Still, it’s, again, clean hardware that neither thrills nor harms, whose little weight also adds to the Monile’s comfort along the way.

One last thing I want to mention is the heat shrink applied to both the source and monitor sides of the cable. The former encases a bit of the wire and about half of the 4.4mm plug’s barrel, which, to me, doesn’t look the cleanest. It has a bit of a DIY feel to it as a result, which I think takes away from the Monile’s sleekness. I understand its purpose in aiding rigidity and longevity. I just wish it was better-executed. On the other side of the cable, as per usual with PW, the wires just prior to the 2-pin plugs have been pre-shaped to loop around the ear, and with a pretty sharp arc. In use, I haven’t found them cumbersome or painful, necessary. But, that may not be true for all ear shapes, and they still make in-ears more difficult to insert for me than usual. So, those are things to keep in mind, and aspects PW can hopefully improve on in the future.
Sound Impressions
PW Audio’s Monile is a cable that accentuates vibrancy, energy and air, mostly through midrange elevation and high-end extension. It doesn’t brighten the in-ear’s tone, per se, but it does introduce a peppiness – a zing or bite – that excites the monitor and discourages any sort of laidbacked-ness or lethargy. Transients leap out at you more, so you’ll get more pop from horns, more crackle from snare drums and livelier delivery from vocalists as well. Those sounds will come off bigger too; taking up more room in the soundscape, in exchange for that more musical delivery. Thankfully, though, this Monile is stellar at layering and separation, which ensures each element stays within bounds and have minimal overlap. When it comes to expansion, the Monile isn’t what I’d call grand or vast. It does have a more intimate stage, especially in terms of width. But, again, there’s more than enough tidiness and air there to not sound claustrophobic. So, all in all, this Monile’s general tone to me is open, well-separated and excited, emphasised on midrange bite, and intimate – but tidy – spatially.

To facilitate its clean, airy, yet intimate sound, the Monile’s been given a slightly tighter, less prevalent mid-bass. It’s not a low-end that’ll necessarily bellow, bloom or fill out the stage. I’d say the warmth of the mid-bass would sit just behind the mids on most pairings. But, it’s not a low-end that’s thin or anaemic either. One of the traits I find most impressive about the Monile is that, despite its supporting role, there’s still a great deal of character, body and texture to its mid-bass. You will still get a round tone to kick drums, toms and bass guitars. Then, because of the bass’s high transparency, you’ll hear better separation between them as well. Listening to Oytun Ersan’s Mysterious Maze on 64 Audio’s A18s, there’s a definite distinction between the kick, bass guitar and the rest of the band during the unison parts. Whereas, it was sort of a blend on its stock cable. Lastly, the Monile makes up for its relaxed mid-bass with some sub-bass physicality. Going back to the track, those toms strike with stunning oomph. So, while tight and clean, PW’s Monile isn’t one to lack character down low.
The midrange, I think, is where PW’s Monile performs the majority of its balancing acts, and it more-or-less nails them all on the head. As previously mentioned, it brings presence and bite to snare drums, keys and the like. But, what it lends at the same time is this roundedness to baritone saxophones and electric guitars too. So, whether it’s Snarky Puppy’s brass section or Joe Satriani’s multi-layered solo on Massive, they’ll all come through musically without seeming top- or bottom-heavy. Another quality that’s nearly unique to the Monile is how it manages to sound big and well-separated at the same time. Despite this added saturation and size, instruments, again, rarely spill over into each other, and there’s a great deal of clean air between them too. With an artist like Jacob Collier, for example, you’ll still be able to discern each of his vocal parts, rather than have them all mix into a single wall of sound. Again, my only gripe here would be a slight lack of stereo spread. Brass and string sections aren’t as wide and expansive as I’d like them to be. But, that aside, I think the midrange truly is this Monile’s selling point: Vibrant and clear with heft, but with the tidiness and air to refine that presence as well.

Up high, the Monile doesn’t add as much colour to my ears, apart from providing a black backdrop, so those background details can come clearly through. Without having to sharpen transients or add brightness, nuances like cymbal trails and snare overtones are better-perceived. Then, louder hits like ride bells and hats are made to cut cleaner too. In extension, it doesn’t quite reach the heights of PW’s flagship 1960’s. But, it does exhibit the more coherent, silky and less aggressive tone to my ears, which can make it a better match with leaner-sounding in-ears or smoother-inclined listeners. It’s a top-end that tapers off towards the mid-treble for that natural, uncoloured timbre, but with enough higher-treble content to make space for the midrange as well. Once again, I would love for a touch more stereo spread here. Chime rings, cymbal washes and cymbal taps that echo around the cranium can do heaps for immersion, and I feel the Monile slightly misses out on this here. Otherwise, though, these are highs that nicely cap the Monile, while making space for its musicality too.
Suggested Pairings
The Monile’s intimacy and bite make it a shoo-in for certain demographics of listeners and IEMs. That vibrancy and mass it brings are what make its sound unique, and below are the three main qualities this Monile can add to your earphones:

Immediacy, forwardness and bite, especially along the upper registers: The Monile’s key draw is the zing it brings to the high-mids and treble. While it doesn’t lend crispness or articulation, necessarily, it does hand a certain punch to those regions, which is ideal of your monitors are coming across hazy, unexcited or lethargic. And, it’s all done without shouty-ness too.
Bigger, more radiant-seeming instruments: The Monile also adds size to instruments; lead guitars, keys and the like almost stretching to fill centre-stage. This is a quality I’d want if my in-ears were a tad too cold, analytical or precise. Adding that sort of warmth or glow could go a very long way in injecting musicality, but without too much of a technical compromise.
Looser, more intimate imaging: The quality above leads right into this one. Obviously, instruments being bigger and closer to you shall result in a more intimate, inviting, involving presentation. This is a change that’d work nicely with in-ears that tend to position instruments towards the periphery of their spaces, rather than the middle. Examples that come to mind are DITA Audio’s original Dream and FiR Audio’s universal M5, along with material like slow-jazz tunes or soaring ballads.

At the same time, the Monile’s coloured presentation does stray it away from certain preferences too. It’s definitely not a cable for the analyst, for example. If you hold any of the two aspects below in top regard, the Monile may not be for you:
Tight, precise and crisply-separated instruments: This directly opposes this Monile’s intended response. Large, intimate and slightly-warm instruments naturally discourage clinical precision and crisp separation. Though the Monile does layer and organise admirably, I’d be more inclined to propose PW’s 2-wire 1960s instead, if pin-point precision is what you’re after.
Flagship-class extension: Compared to pricier, flagship-class cables, the Monile can lack that final bit of reach, which limits the definition of its image, as well as the physicality of instruments that reside in the extremes. Sub-bass rumbles aren’t the most visceral in the world, and top-end transparency falls short of – say – PW’s 2-wire 1960s. So, despite the Monile’s capabilities within its price bracket, it’s not a cable I’d pair with an ultra-high-end in-ear, lest it gets slightly bottlenecked.
Select Comparisons
DITA Audio OSLO (USD 580)
The Monile and OSLO sport pretty similar, mostly uncoloured tonalities, but delivered in two different ways. The Monile’s a more direct, articulate-sounding cable, which propels notes with higher energy and punch, while the OSLO’s transients throughout the frequency range are a hair more relaxed; airy. Down low, for example, the OSLO has the warmer, bigger-sounding lows, but the Monile’s jab harder. Kick drums thwack with more force on the latter, and the same goes for bass plucks as well. Though the frequencies in question aren’t necessarily lifted on the Monile, they do hit harder. Now, where the Monile does inch a tad forward would be the high-mids and lower-treble. Trumpets and guitars, hi-hats and cymbals all come off slightly brighter, slightly crisper and slightly more vibrant too. This’ll fit your IEM more if you feel it’s lacking a bit of immediacy or bite. Conversely, the OSLO edges the Monile out in end-to-end extension. You’ll hear a more physical rumble and tighter spatial cues on this OSLO, as well as a slightly more stable, defined image. But, to me, those technical differences don’t outweigh the dynamic ones, so, as always, the choice would depend on what you’ll need for your in-ear.

Eletech Socrates (USD 699)
Eletech’s Socrates, like the Monile, is a conductor with energy, immediacy and punch packed within a compact, yet tidily-organised space. Where the two ultimately diverge is how they distribute that energy throughout their frequency charts. A lot of the Monile’s bigness lies further up the range, with a ton of body given to its high-mids and highs. On Nathan and Noah East’s rendition of Over the Rainbow, for example, the Monile will emphasise the rightmost keys of the piano, along with the higher registers of the string section. By comparison, the Socrates comes off more balanced. Those lower, more bass-y bellows and grunts of the piano have as much presence and weight as the higher notes, and the violas are as key in the orchestra as the violins. This Socrates’ upper registers are tighter than the Monile’s too; not as radiant or wet. This compactness grants more precise imaging, and it allows more air to flow throughout the image as well. But, PW’s Monile then delivers the more resonant, inviting profile as a result, so these will be the trade-offs you’ll have to decide between.

PW Audio 2-wire 1960s (USD 999)
Comparing this Monile to its spiritual sibling, let’s say, there’re immediately differences heard in presentation. The 2-wire 1960s has tighter, quicker-sounding notes cased within an airier, more defined stage, which hands it the more expansive and more precise sound of the two. Much of that has to do with its stronger upper-end extension, and it’s what gifts this cable a palpably deeper image as well. By comparison, the Monile is a more intimate-sounding cable, where instruments are not only positioned further upfront, but they’re looser as well; bigger in size with an aura of warmth around them. It’s especially true in the midrange, where the Monile’s guitars and snare drums come off more saturated. This 2-wire 1960s’ are far airier and more precise by comparison, but more distant-sounding as well. So, like the Socrates, I’d shout-out the Monile for intimacy and soul, while the 2-wire 1960s is great for precision, stereo separation and a more surround sound feel. Lastly, in terms of resolution and texture, you’d be able to hear the finer details on the 2-wire 1960s. The backdrop’s cleaner too. But, when highlighting individuals in simpler, more acoustic arrangements, I do prefer the Monile’s intimacy.

Verdict
PW Audio’s Monile is an upgrade cable that delivers vibrance, musicality and size without ever becoming brash or loud. It imbues instruments with bigness and bite; breathing life into monitors you may’ve found nonchalant or lethargic. It adds airiness and resolution where it can. And, it provides a fairly neutral, well-balanced tonality that’ll suit the vast majority of in-ears, as long as you won’t mind a midrange with bite. Now, against pricier options, this Monile may not quite reach the same heights in stage expansion, stereo separation or top-end extension. But, within the price range, and with its strong ergonomics and feel to boot, I feel it remains a unique option for its exuberance and intimacy, yet executed with finesse.

PW Audio’s Monile is available for purchase now on MusicTeck.com, and it’s currently a part of their Black Friday Sale. Click the following link for their promo price list.
The post PW Audio Monile: Colour Me Bold – An In-Ear Monitor Cable Review first appeared on The Headphone List.
