fbpx

Meze Liric II Vs Dan Clark Audio E3 Comparison Review

Meze Liric II Vs Dan Clark Audio E3 Comparison Review

On paper, there’s loads in frequent between the brand new Meze Liric II and Dan Clark Audio’s E3. They’re each neutral-warm, closed-back, planar-dynamic headphones that clock in at $1,999. Yet in my expertise with them, I really discovered them to be fully distinct from each other. In this comparability assessment, we’ll break down all the pieces from construct, design, and sound high quality to see which may be the higher match for you. 

What You Get

Liric II E3
  • Liric II Isodynamic headphones
  • Carrying case
  • Leather drawstring pouch
  • 3.5mm customary cable
  • 4.4mm balanced copper premium cable
  • Quarter-inch adapter
  • Airplane adapter
  • E3 headphones
  • Carrying case
  • Choice of 4-pin VIVO cable
  • Drawstring bag

 

Look and Feel: 

Both of those headphones appear and feel luxurious. The Liric II is gorgeously crafted, that includes leather-based ear pads, metallic yokes, and Macassar ebony wooden on the ear cups. The headphone feels nice to put on with applicable clamping pressure, making certain good isolation. I used to be in a position to put on these for lengthy listening periods with out feeling any fatigue. 

Meanwhile, the E3 is constructed extra like a tank. Yes it nonetheless feels premium, however this can be a little bit extra rugged, which is appropriate for on-the-go use. This headphone makes use of gorilla glass to guard its ear cups, and sports activities basic Dan Clark supplies like a Nitinol headband and a folding mechanism for its ear cups, as soon as once more, maximizing portability. Like the Meze, clamping pressure feels applicable and gives nice isolation. 

The Liric II ships with a number of varieties of cables whereas the E3 ships together with your single alternative of cable. Frankly, I just like the Meze cable much more. It’s nimble however well-built. Dan Clark’s cable is cumbersome and stiff, feeling a bit utilitarian and inconvenient for transportable use. Add in Meze’s included completely different cable choices and also you get a way more versatile set of headphones. Both instances really feel compact sufficient for transportable use however it must be famous that the E3’s skill to fold right into a small case makes it simply that rather more handy to tackle the highway. 

Both headphones are marketed as being good for journey and transportable listening environments, however I discover the E3 extra profitable in that regard. However, in case you’re on the lookout for a closed again headphone for dwelling use, each headphones will serve you properly.

Design:

The Liric II and E3 every have loads occurring beneath the hood. Starting with the Liric II, Meze has utilized its new Quarter Wavelength Resonator Mask or QWRM. The QWRM covers up choose parts of the motive force to assist cut back harsh frequencies. Meze particularly cites frequencies at 7kHz and above as targets for the QWRM. This tech helps tailor the sound coming from the MZ4 driver that’s carried over, albeit with adjusted tuning, from the unique Liric. 

Meanwhile, the E3 additionally makes use of an acoustic filtering system to assist refine the headphone’s sound. The Acoustic Metamaterial Tuning System controls diffusion and aggressive high-frequency info to create an general extra pleasing treble response. It additionally makes use of a Dual-Mode Bass Port to reinforce the bass response, making it extra articulate and freed from bloat. 

Both headphones supply superior expertise. With both alternative, you’re positive to be on the forefront of audio tech.  

Low End:

Okay, let’s get into the sound of those headphones. Like I mentioned earlier, there’s loads in frequent between these headphones, particularly their neutral-warm sound signatures. But the bass response is the place these headphones differ essentially the most, for my part. To my ear, the Liric II has a meatier bass with extra dynamic punch and a boosted midbass. The E3, then again, is a little more deliberate with its bass response. You positively hear each low finish element however you don’t fairly really feel it as a lot as you do on the Liric II. 

That mentioned, the E3 has a cleaner bass area. Every beat feels rigorously rendered and low finish separation is extraordinarily spectacular. The Liric II is a little more visceral and the midbass enhance makes for a extra musical expertise. 

So in case you like a clear, well-separated, and nearer to balanced low finish the place you possibly can hear all the pieces, the E3 may be for you. But in case you’re right into a extra dynamic presentation the place you possibly can really feel extra, then the Liric II may be the higher path. 

Midrange:

Both headphones have a clear midrange. The E3 goals nearer to the Harman Target, so the midrange can really feel slightly recessed at occasions. Meanwhile, the Liric II is a little more current. And with its boosted midbass, the transition into the mids is the place the Liric II’s heat actually comes from. I’d most likely describe each headphones’ mids as relaxed, although the Liric II is a little more partaking. Vocals simply have slightly bit extra element and the layering of mid vary devices simply feels extra responsive and pure. 

That mentioned, the E3’s considerably scooped midrange helps it really feel a bit extra open and ethereal. There isn’t any bloat, only a lean however imply impartial response. I’d additionally enterprise to say this midrange presentation helps to make the headphone really feel slightly bit extra open sounding too, however I received’t spoil something for the soundstage part. 

Top End:

The high finish is the place these headphones sound essentially the most comparable. I suppose that is smart, although, as they each make the most of filtering techniques to maintain the treble sounding crisp however with none harsh edges. The highs are clear and non fatiguing. If I had to decide on between the 2, I’d say that, as soon as once more, the treble on the Liric II is only a bit extra energetic whereas the E3 is a bit more detailed. Hi-hats are quick and thrilling on the Liric II, however they’re very properly managed. The E3, nonetheless, can get slightly bit harsh at occasions. This may very well be due to the much less coloured and even keeled mid vary. Overall, the E3 simply feels a bit thinner, which causes the excessive finish to maybe really feel exaggerated. 

Soundstage:

The Liric II and E3 each have nice soundstages, however they’re completely different. Dan Clark Audio has lengthy been on a mission to make their closed again headphones sound like open again ones, and I feel it’s cheap to say that the E3 succeeds. Yet whereas it feels very extensive, the sound nearly feels too distant at occasions. Because of this, music loses some dynamic skill and sounds much less thrilling.

The Liric II could also be only a smidge narrower however imaging feels much more pure and correct. This comes from a sense that sound is resolving outward, like an open again headphone would. While the headphone doesn’t essentially sound the widest I’ve ever heard, its natural soundstage is extraordinarily spectacular and satisfying to take heed to. 

Conclusion:

As far as closed again headphones go, you possibly can’t go improper with both pair. But, there are some key variations between the 2 and various kinds of listeners might favor one over the opposite. If you want a headphone that goes for the Harman Target, sounds extraordinarily extensive, and presents element in a deliberate and delicate method, the E3 is an effective path for you. If you like a extra visceral expertise with a extra pure presentation of sound, then I feel the Liric II is a good alternative. 

The Meze Liric II and Dan Clark Audio E3 can be found at Audio46.

The publish Meze Liric II Vs Dan Clark Audio E3 Comparison Review appeared first on Major HiFi.

HI-FI News

by way of Major HiFi https://majorhifi.com/

March 13, 2024 at 05:32PM

Select your currency